The list of stuff I've read and seen is getting a little long so I'd better get caught up quickly here:
Books:
The Marching Season, The Mark of the Assassin and Prince of Fire by Daniel Silva Been a little bit of a binge with this author. He writes very nice thrillers in the same genre as say Jack Higgins or Tom Clancy. Silva falls somewhere between those two. Assassin and Marching Season are part of an ongoing story line with a common hero - Michael Osborne. They deal with a secret society of intelligence chiefs and international corporate types who have decided that business is better when the world is less peaceful. They proceed to do everything they can to keep it that way. I enjoyed them both even while Marching Season has one of the worst sentences I've come across in a major novel. Osborne is in his bedroom talking with his wife when he "took off his clothes, made a sandwich and got into bed". I've never actually considered moving the kitchen the bedroom but I suppose it might work. Somebody should have caught that.
Prince of Fire is from Silva's longer series of books revolving around art restorer and Israeli spy Gabriel Allon. Allon works undercover but discovers that somehow a dossier revealling everything about him has gotten into the other side's hands. Along the way he will have to confront a few ghosts from his past.
I enjoy Silva's writing and will work my way through it all.
Lost Horizons - James Hilton I read this book because of a movie. Not curiously the movie version of the book but because of "Hearts in Atlantis" which I reviewed earlier. I'm trying to get some older works in my reading list on a regular basis and this seemed like an interesting one. Interesting it was! This is the story of
a small group of people who find themselves being taken high into the Himalayas against their will. There they discover Shangri-La, a utopian lamasery where people for very long times. Other secrets are revealed and choices have to be made. The book sucked me right in.
The Library - and Illustrated History by Stuart Murray - I love libraries. They are one of my favorite places on earth. So I was all set to love this book. Beautiful pictures on great heavy paper, just wonderful. And a disappointment. The authors take the least interesting approach to the growth of the library (a linear one), spend time talking about some of the folks who created libraries (without every really getting into their stories), ignores several fascinating themes (the idea of a public library, the idea of a lending library, the entire question of organizing a library - Dewey Decimal System gets about two short paragraphs) and then relegates the actual libraries to brief summaries at the very end of the book. Very disappointing.
Our Kind of Traitor by John Le Carre - I enjoy Le Carre's stuff, he is the master of the Cold War era spy novel. So I was interested to see how he was dealing with the post Cold War era. With this one he moves into the realm of international crime and money laundering. After a dreadfully slow start (the first 30 pages seemed rather disjointed to me) the book took off. Enjoyed it.
Into the Darkness by Harry Turtledove - Turtledove is probably THE name in what's "alternative history", effectively taking a "what if" approach to actual history. I've read several of his and enjoyed them, especially "Ruled Britannia" which looks at England if the Spanish Armada had succeeded in conquering. So I thought I'd give a shot at this. The cover doesn't indicate that it's the first of a SIX novel series which irritates me. But not as much as the poor writing in this book. In this case he has re-imagined the second World War by moving it to a new planet. Many things aren't explained along the way, the character list is something like 7 pages long and nothing is resolved at the end of the novel. I read it, I won't read the rest. Disappointing.
The Axeman's Jazz by Julie Smith - I've never read anything of Smith's before but I enjoyed this. It features a recurring character, female police officer Skip Langdon and takes place in New Orleans. I like jazz, love New Orleans and am a Smith on my mother's side so when I found this while wandering the stacks at the local library I pretty much had to read it. Smith calls on an old unsolved murder spree from the Big Easy back in 1918-19 then brings it forward to the present. Nicely written and very enjoyable.
Movies -
Voyage of the Dawn Treader - (2010) The latest in the Chronicles of Narnia series to come to the screen and once again they've done a nice job with it. The young actors all do a very nice job and they stay quite close (not close enough for some I know) to the original materials. Enjoyed it as well.
Bob Roberts (1992) Stars Tim Robbins and dozens of other names you'll recognize. This is a mockumentary about a folk singing conservative political candidate who runs for U.S. Senate from Pennsylvania. The feel is very good and the politics will look (sadly) very familiar. As will the cast. I spent a lot of time going "Who is that?" and spotting a very young Jack Black(his first movie) among many others (Pamela Reed, Helen Hunt, David Straithan, Susan Sarandon, James Spader, John Cusak, Lynn Thigpen, the list goes on) If you're into politics you'll love this. If our current political model turns your stomach you might want to take a pass.
Unstoppable - (2010) stars Denzel Washington and Chris Pine. Based on a true story of a runaway train this is a great, edge of your seat thriller. The two stars create believable characters that you'll enjoy as well. The story is set in south central and south western Pennsylvania (even though most of it was filmed in Ohio! Heresy) and it made me feel profoundly home sick. This will certainly not be one of the big money makers of the year it is certainly worth your time.
Monday, December 27, 2010
Wednesday, December 22, 2010
View From the Phlipside - TV Stupid
My name is Jay Phillippi and I've spent my life in and around the media. TV, Radio, the Movies and more. I love them and I hate them and I always have an opinion. Call this the View From the Phlipside.
I was watching TV last week when I saw something that I know I’ve seen hundreds of times before. We all have. But this time the absurdity of it all just grabbed me by the throat.
It was a commercial for a brand of dish washing detergent. The pitch was pretty straight forward - easy to use (as if any kind of this product is HARD to use) and very powerful. In fact this campaign is all about taking care of the dishes that have been sitting around for a whole 24 HOURS! These people have never been in my house. The dishes get washed when the machine is full and that might take days. Anyway. In the commercial the dishwasher door is closed and suddenly a team of construction workers spring into action with heavy machinery and hard hats. All diligently clearing away all that leftover food.
And that’s when I noticed it.
The little disclaimer in one corner of the screen reading “Dramatization”. Seriously? There are people out there who need to be told that putting a little gel cube of dish washing stuff into the detergent drawer will not in fact release a team of tiny little construction workers inside your kitchen appliance. They might actually think that’s what’s going to happen. Really? Jokes have been made for decades now about safety warnings on products and the like. It just seems like the level of “stupid” seems to be on the rise. At least if the number of “Don’t be stupid” reminders is any indication.
I have no problem with the ones about “Professional stunt man” or “ Professional driver on a closed course”. Sadly we do need to protect ourselves from fools who want to believe that they can do anything they see on TV. If there was a designated place where they could go and kill themselves without endangering the rest of us I’d have no trouble with winnowing the gene pool. Does that sound callous? I fully support every one’s right to do what they like so long at they do not endanger the rest of us or expect the rest of us to clean up their mess,physically or financially.
But have we really gotten to the point where there is a common disconnect between what is real and imaginary? Or even worse between what is physically possible and not?
This commercial seems to believe we have and that may make it the most frightening thing I’ve seen on TV this year.
Call that the View From the Phlipside.
"The View From the Phlipside" airs on WRFA-LP Jamestown NY. You can listen to WRFA online HERE
Copyright - Jay Phillippi 2010
I was watching TV last week when I saw something that I know I’ve seen hundreds of times before. We all have. But this time the absurdity of it all just grabbed me by the throat.
It was a commercial for a brand of dish washing detergent. The pitch was pretty straight forward - easy to use (as if any kind of this product is HARD to use) and very powerful. In fact this campaign is all about taking care of the dishes that have been sitting around for a whole 24 HOURS! These people have never been in my house. The dishes get washed when the machine is full and that might take days. Anyway. In the commercial the dishwasher door is closed and suddenly a team of construction workers spring into action with heavy machinery and hard hats. All diligently clearing away all that leftover food.
And that’s when I noticed it.
The little disclaimer in one corner of the screen reading “Dramatization”. Seriously? There are people out there who need to be told that putting a little gel cube of dish washing stuff into the detergent drawer will not in fact release a team of tiny little construction workers inside your kitchen appliance. They might actually think that’s what’s going to happen. Really? Jokes have been made for decades now about safety warnings on products and the like. It just seems like the level of “stupid” seems to be on the rise. At least if the number of “Don’t be stupid” reminders is any indication.
I have no problem with the ones about “Professional stunt man” or “ Professional driver on a closed course”. Sadly we do need to protect ourselves from fools who want to believe that they can do anything they see on TV. If there was a designated place where they could go and kill themselves without endangering the rest of us I’d have no trouble with winnowing the gene pool. Does that sound callous? I fully support every one’s right to do what they like so long at they do not endanger the rest of us or expect the rest of us to clean up their mess,physically or financially.
But have we really gotten to the point where there is a common disconnect between what is real and imaginary? Or even worse between what is physically possible and not?
This commercial seems to believe we have and that may make it the most frightening thing I’ve seen on TV this year.
Call that the View From the Phlipside.
"The View From the Phlipside" airs on WRFA-LP Jamestown NY. You can listen to WRFA online HERE
Copyright - Jay Phillippi 2010
Tuesday, December 21, 2010
View From the Phlipside - Golden Globes
My name is Jay Phillippi and I've spent my life in and around the media. TV, Radio, the Movies and more. I love them and I hate them and I always have an opinion. Call this the View From the Phlipside.
Any time a new set of award nominees are named there’s always discussion about who was chosen, who WASN’T chosen, why they were chosen, who should have been chosen. The discussion can get quite heated at times. It doesn’t matter if it’s for some award or a Hall of Fame (the names for the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame are a case in point. People are still arguing about ABBA’s inclusion. The 2011 inductees will be Dr. John, The Alice Cooper Band, Neil Diamond, Darlene Love, and Tom Waits. I’ve got no real problem with any of them. You may commence your discussion of their relative merits)
What got me thinking about this was the announcement of the Golden Globe Awards. The Golden Globes have been around since 1944 and are awarded by the Hollywood Foreign Press Association. Originally they were movie only, then added TV in the ‘50s. They also recognize one person for outstanding contributions to the world of entertainment with the Cecil B. DeMille Award. The original purpose of the awards was to butter up Hollywood to give the foreign press better access to the industry. Today the awards result in a lot money that goes to charity and scholarships.
What grabbed me about this years awards was in the category of Comedy or Musical. Not surprised to see “Burlesque” and “The Kids Are All Right”. A musical and a comedy. The rest of the slate is a little confusing. We have “Alice in Wonderland”, “RED” and “The Tourist”. If Tourist is a comedy someone needs to tell Sony Entertainment this because their trailers stink. I see no sign of any comic elements in the advertisements either. I saw Alice and the same reaction there. Ummm, comedy? Musical? No. It was an OK movie that I enjoyed but I would never consider it a comedy. I also saw RED and can say it was very funny. But again I’m not sure I’d call it a comedy. An action movie with a strong comic inclination sure but...
Was the comedy field so thin this year that they felt like they had to really reach for nominees? Or did they just feel like they needed to throw someone a bone? The other theory is that these are place holders to fill out a field so that you can push the award toward one particular favorite.
So when you see all the hoopla about “Golden Globe” nominations in all the advertising over the next couple months just remember. These are suck up awards.
Call that the View From the Phlipside.
"The View From the Phlipside" airs on WRFA-LP Jamestown NY. You can listen to WRFA online HERE
Copyright - Jay Phillippi 2010
Any time a new set of award nominees are named there’s always discussion about who was chosen, who WASN’T chosen, why they were chosen, who should have been chosen. The discussion can get quite heated at times. It doesn’t matter if it’s for some award or a Hall of Fame (the names for the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame are a case in point. People are still arguing about ABBA’s inclusion. The 2011 inductees will be Dr. John, The Alice Cooper Band, Neil Diamond, Darlene Love, and Tom Waits. I’ve got no real problem with any of them. You may commence your discussion of their relative merits)
What got me thinking about this was the announcement of the Golden Globe Awards. The Golden Globes have been around since 1944 and are awarded by the Hollywood Foreign Press Association. Originally they were movie only, then added TV in the ‘50s. They also recognize one person for outstanding contributions to the world of entertainment with the Cecil B. DeMille Award. The original purpose of the awards was to butter up Hollywood to give the foreign press better access to the industry. Today the awards result in a lot money that goes to charity and scholarships.
What grabbed me about this years awards was in the category of Comedy or Musical. Not surprised to see “Burlesque” and “The Kids Are All Right”. A musical and a comedy. The rest of the slate is a little confusing. We have “Alice in Wonderland”, “RED” and “The Tourist”. If Tourist is a comedy someone needs to tell Sony Entertainment this because their trailers stink. I see no sign of any comic elements in the advertisements either. I saw Alice and the same reaction there. Ummm, comedy? Musical? No. It was an OK movie that I enjoyed but I would never consider it a comedy. I also saw RED and can say it was very funny. But again I’m not sure I’d call it a comedy. An action movie with a strong comic inclination sure but...
Was the comedy field so thin this year that they felt like they had to really reach for nominees? Or did they just feel like they needed to throw someone a bone? The other theory is that these are place holders to fill out a field so that you can push the award toward one particular favorite.
So when you see all the hoopla about “Golden Globe” nominations in all the advertising over the next couple months just remember. These are suck up awards.
Call that the View From the Phlipside.
"The View From the Phlipside" airs on WRFA-LP Jamestown NY. You can listen to WRFA online HERE
Copyright - Jay Phillippi 2010
Monday, December 20, 2010
View From the Phlipside - Christmas Movies
My name is Jay Phillippi and I've spent my life in and around the media. TV, Radio, the Movies and more. I love them and I hate them and I always have an opinion. Call this the View From the Phlipside.
And the usual ranting about Christmas is well under way. The "Happy Holidays" rant, the "They've stolen Christmas" rant, all the usual suspects. I'm tempted to add a little rant of my own, mostly about how tired I am of the other rants. Instead let’s take a look a something important. Like the most important Christmas movies and TV specials
It's Christmas. Make of it what you will. Maybe it’s a high holy day for you. Maybe it’s really about Santa and the swag under the tree. Maybe it’s just something to be survived. Go for it. I intend to revel in the midnight mass at my home parish. Smells and bells, and a full choir and all the decorations. I will rejoice in the arrival of the Messiah and the miracle of it all.
In the meantime let’s focus on what we can agree on. Movies and TV specials have become an important part of getting ready for the season. I'm going to enjoy my favorite Christmas specials. I own a copy of just about all of them:
WKRP in Cincinnati Christmas episode - a great show about radio and a great riff on Dickens.
A Charlie Brown Christmas - If I only could have only one this is it. It’s amazing how well it holds up after all these decades.
Rudolph the Red Nosed Reindeer - love it. Yukon Cornelius and stop action animation.
The Homecoming - Christmas with the Waltons. A truly classic Christmas story
How The Grinch Stole Christmas - animated original only, don't bring that other one 'round here.
Scrooge (A Christmas Carol) - The Alistair Sims version or the Mr. Magoo version both classics
White Christmas - yeah, only nominally a true Christmas story but I love it.
A Wish for Wings that Work - OK my natural weirdness bubbles up on this one. This is the Bloom County animated special. It's very hard to find but my most excellent brother got it for me.
Miracle on 34th Street - the original only thank you very much.
There are lots of others out there (I will no doubt get an earful about omitting “A Christmas Story” or “Elf”. Sorry neither make my cut). So watch what puts you in the mood, have a very Merry Christmas and a Happy Holiday and God Bless us everyone!
Call that the View From the Phlipside.
"The View From the Phlipside" airs on WRFA-LP Jamestown NY. You can listen to WRFA online HERE
Copyright - Jay Phillippi 2010
And the usual ranting about Christmas is well under way. The "Happy Holidays" rant, the "They've stolen Christmas" rant, all the usual suspects. I'm tempted to add a little rant of my own, mostly about how tired I am of the other rants. Instead let’s take a look a something important. Like the most important Christmas movies and TV specials
It's Christmas. Make of it what you will. Maybe it’s a high holy day for you. Maybe it’s really about Santa and the swag under the tree. Maybe it’s just something to be survived. Go for it. I intend to revel in the midnight mass at my home parish. Smells and bells, and a full choir and all the decorations. I will rejoice in the arrival of the Messiah and the miracle of it all.
In the meantime let’s focus on what we can agree on. Movies and TV specials have become an important part of getting ready for the season. I'm going to enjoy my favorite Christmas specials. I own a copy of just about all of them:
WKRP in Cincinnati Christmas episode - a great show about radio and a great riff on Dickens.
A Charlie Brown Christmas - If I only could have only one this is it. It’s amazing how well it holds up after all these decades.
Rudolph the Red Nosed Reindeer - love it. Yukon Cornelius and stop action animation.
The Homecoming - Christmas with the Waltons. A truly classic Christmas story
How The Grinch Stole Christmas - animated original only, don't bring that other one 'round here.
Scrooge (A Christmas Carol) - The Alistair Sims version or the Mr. Magoo version both classics
White Christmas - yeah, only nominally a true Christmas story but I love it.
A Wish for Wings that Work - OK my natural weirdness bubbles up on this one. This is the Bloom County animated special. It's very hard to find but my most excellent brother got it for me.
Miracle on 34th Street - the original only thank you very much.
There are lots of others out there (I will no doubt get an earful about omitting “A Christmas Story” or “Elf”. Sorry neither make my cut). So watch what puts you in the mood, have a very Merry Christmas and a Happy Holiday and God Bless us everyone!
Call that the View From the Phlipside.
"The View From the Phlipside" airs on WRFA-LP Jamestown NY. You can listen to WRFA online HERE
Copyright - Jay Phillippi 2010
Wednesday, December 15, 2010
View From the Phlipside - Retransmissions
My name is Jay Phillippi and I've spent my life in and around the media. TV, Radio, the Movies and more. I love them and I hate them and I always have an opinion. Call this the View From the Phlipside.
If you watch the local Fox Network TV channels you may have seen some rather ominous warnings appearing during your favorite shows that seemed to indicate that you were about to lose that channel because of some kind of battle between the station and your cable provider. Ever wonder what was really going on? I can shed a little light on the subject plus point out that the problem isn’t going to go away any time soon.
At the bottom of the whole issue is what’s called retransmission fees and it’s a big deal in the cable/satellite/network business these days. Basically the argument is that the cable type folks are getting entire networks worth of content for very little money. The local stations and/or the networks feel like they put up all the cash, do all the work and the cable types are making big profits for very little investment. The cable types already pay a fee to use that content (the “retransmission fee”) and feel that the TV folks are trying to grab an unfair portion of their operating profits. Guess who is in the middle of that tug of war? That would be you the viewer.
A lot of the fee structures were set when many fewer folks were getting their TV entertainment via cable or satellite. The business model has changed and the fee structure probably has to change with it. We the viewers will get shouted at by both sides but in the end they’ll find a way to just charge us more and then they’ll move on.
The long range problem is actually for the small specialty cable networks. The ones with limited though dedicated viewers but which generate very little ad monies for the local cable/satellite companies. As their budgets get pinched they’ll have to make cuts somewhere. It seems inevitable that some of those smaller networks will get dropped or have their fees negotiated down. And bunches of them will simply go belly up. Instead you’ll just one more cookie cutter network owned by the big media companies.
Or maybe the little guys will just move over on to the world wide web and we’ll start the process all over again.
Call that the View From the Phlipside.
"The View From the Phlipside" airs on WRFA-LP Jamestown NY. You can listen to WRFA online HERE
Copyright - Jay Phillippi 2010
If you watch the local Fox Network TV channels you may have seen some rather ominous warnings appearing during your favorite shows that seemed to indicate that you were about to lose that channel because of some kind of battle between the station and your cable provider. Ever wonder what was really going on? I can shed a little light on the subject plus point out that the problem isn’t going to go away any time soon.
At the bottom of the whole issue is what’s called retransmission fees and it’s a big deal in the cable/satellite/network business these days. Basically the argument is that the cable type folks are getting entire networks worth of content for very little money. The local stations and/or the networks feel like they put up all the cash, do all the work and the cable types are making big profits for very little investment. The cable types already pay a fee to use that content (the “retransmission fee”) and feel that the TV folks are trying to grab an unfair portion of their operating profits. Guess who is in the middle of that tug of war? That would be you the viewer.
A lot of the fee structures were set when many fewer folks were getting their TV entertainment via cable or satellite. The business model has changed and the fee structure probably has to change with it. We the viewers will get shouted at by both sides but in the end they’ll find a way to just charge us more and then they’ll move on.
The long range problem is actually for the small specialty cable networks. The ones with limited though dedicated viewers but which generate very little ad monies for the local cable/satellite companies. As their budgets get pinched they’ll have to make cuts somewhere. It seems inevitable that some of those smaller networks will get dropped or have their fees negotiated down. And bunches of them will simply go belly up. Instead you’ll just one more cookie cutter network owned by the big media companies.
Or maybe the little guys will just move over on to the world wide web and we’ll start the process all over again.
Call that the View From the Phlipside.
"The View From the Phlipside" airs on WRFA-LP Jamestown NY. You can listen to WRFA online HERE
Copyright - Jay Phillippi 2010
Tuesday, December 14, 2010
View From the Phlipside - Zonker Harris and Wesleyan
My name is Jay Phillippi and I've spent my life in and around the media. TV, Radio, the Movies and more. I love them and I hate them and I always have an opinion. Call this the View From the Phlipside.
So I was reading the comics the other week when I saw that the story line on my favorite strip had suddenly detoured. If you read Doonesbury (and you should) you’ll remember that suddenly a story line with Zonker popped up out of nowhere. It seemed that some college used to have a day named in Zonker’s honor till the president put the kibosh on it. Zonker was a little puzzled by it all and so was I so I did a little research.
It didn’t take much to find that the story was true. Wesleyan University in Connecticut started celebrating Zonker Harris Day back in the ‘70’s. It has always been a decidely, shall we say, counter-cultural affair with a certain use of legally frowned upon substances. In 2008 the president of the University decided that Zonker was not the sort of person the University wished to be associated with and threatened to pull the funding. Garry Trudeau the creator responded this year after the students decided to take the case to a higher court.
Where to even begin with this? As Zonker himself noted, the president is aware that he’s a fictional character, right? The complaint was because Zonker was an inveterate user of marijuana in his past. I haven’t seen him use it recently. Of course the University said NOTHING about the activities that actually go on during the event, they just wanted the name changed. They also overlooked the fall event at Wesleyan called “Duke Day” named for another and decidedly less socially acceptable character from the strip. Trudeau had been aware of the flap in 08 but had chosen discretion as the better part of valor. The letter from the students this year impressed him so much he decided to weigh in finally.
Surely the president of a University that has been around for almost 180 years has better things to do that demand name changes of student blowouts. Even Zonker has better things to do. This coming April he will NOT be able to attend the next festival as it interferes with the Royal Wedding in England which is already on his calendar.
In the end three cheers to the students at Wesleyan. Like their idea of a good time or not they have the right attitude to the mis-application of power. When the university demanded a name change they did. The festival is currently called “Ze who must not be named” day.
Call that the View From the Phlipside.
So I was reading the comics the other week when I saw that the story line on my favorite strip had suddenly detoured. If you read Doonesbury (and you should) you’ll remember that suddenly a story line with Zonker popped up out of nowhere. It seemed that some college used to have a day named in Zonker’s honor till the president put the kibosh on it. Zonker was a little puzzled by it all and so was I so I did a little research.
It didn’t take much to find that the story was true. Wesleyan University in Connecticut started celebrating Zonker Harris Day back in the ‘70’s. It has always been a decidely, shall we say, counter-cultural affair with a certain use of legally frowned upon substances. In 2008 the president of the University decided that Zonker was not the sort of person the University wished to be associated with and threatened to pull the funding. Garry Trudeau the creator responded this year after the students decided to take the case to a higher court.
Where to even begin with this? As Zonker himself noted, the president is aware that he’s a fictional character, right? The complaint was because Zonker was an inveterate user of marijuana in his past. I haven’t seen him use it recently. Of course the University said NOTHING about the activities that actually go on during the event, they just wanted the name changed. They also overlooked the fall event at Wesleyan called “Duke Day” named for another and decidedly less socially acceptable character from the strip. Trudeau had been aware of the flap in 08 but had chosen discretion as the better part of valor. The letter from the students this year impressed him so much he decided to weigh in finally.
Surely the president of a University that has been around for almost 180 years has better things to do that demand name changes of student blowouts. Even Zonker has better things to do. This coming April he will NOT be able to attend the next festival as it interferes with the Royal Wedding in England which is already on his calendar.
In the end three cheers to the students at Wesleyan. Like their idea of a good time or not they have the right attitude to the mis-application of power. When the university demanded a name change they did. The festival is currently called “Ze who must not be named” day.
Call that the View From the Phlipside.
"The View From the Phlipside" airs on WRFA-LP Jamestown NY. You can listen to WRFA online HERE
Copyright - Jay Phillippi 2010
Monday, December 13, 2010
View From the Phlipside - WikiLeaks
My name is Jay Phillippi and I've spent my life in and around the media. TV, Radio, the Movies and more. I love them and I hate them and I always have an opinion. Call this the View From the Phlipside.
In the midst of one of the biggest news stories of the moment is another story sitting quietly waiting to be noticed. I thought I’d shine a little light on it for a moment or two right now. The web site WikiLeaks has been very much in the news over the last month after they published some 251,287 diplomatic cables sent by U.S. diplomats all over the world. WikiLeaks is dedicated to creating more transparency in governments all over the world. They pursue this goal by obtaining and then releasing documents that the various governments would prefer to keep private.
I’m not an unalloyed fan of WikiLeaks. Basically all they do is dump material into the information stream without any analysis or context. While they claim to be part of the journalistic tradition I think they fall short. On the other hand they’ve done a much better job of being responsible about some of the information than their critics would have you believe. They have redacted names (that means they blocked them out before releasing them), they even asked the U.S. government for assistance in doing just that which the government declined. Reactions have been weighed heavily on the side of the hysterical. A Canadian diplomat apparently suggested the head of WikiLeaks should be assassinated, U.S. politicians claim that the organization has “blood” on their hands (a claim that the U.S. Department of Defense seems to contradict curiously) and there’s been much made of the Espionage Act of 1917.
The problem is that what WikiLeaks has done is NOT espionage under the intention of the Act. The original clearly exempted journalists from the definition. And well they might. A strong, even adversarial press is a vital part of the American way of life. We MUST have groups out there digging where the power brokers don’t want us and playing the role of muckraker. It is the single most effective balk on the misuse of power in a democracy. Consequently I am much more disturbed by our government putting the strong arm on American corporations to cut ties with WikiLeaks. There is a much greater threat to our liberties in those actions than in what has been released so far. And we better figure out how to deal with this new adjunct to the world of journalism since a new competing service called OpenLeaks is prepared to debut soon.
What the muckraker pulls up and pushes into our noses is often unpleasant but the role is one that has an honored and vital role in our national life. We shut then down at our own peril.
Call that the View From the Phlipside.
"The View From the Phlipside" airs on WRFA-LP Jamestown NY. You can listen to WRFA online HERE
Copyright - Jay Phillippi 2010
In the midst of one of the biggest news stories of the moment is another story sitting quietly waiting to be noticed. I thought I’d shine a little light on it for a moment or two right now. The web site WikiLeaks has been very much in the news over the last month after they published some 251,287 diplomatic cables sent by U.S. diplomats all over the world. WikiLeaks is dedicated to creating more transparency in governments all over the world. They pursue this goal by obtaining and then releasing documents that the various governments would prefer to keep private.
I’m not an unalloyed fan of WikiLeaks. Basically all they do is dump material into the information stream without any analysis or context. While they claim to be part of the journalistic tradition I think they fall short. On the other hand they’ve done a much better job of being responsible about some of the information than their critics would have you believe. They have redacted names (that means they blocked them out before releasing them), they even asked the U.S. government for assistance in doing just that which the government declined. Reactions have been weighed heavily on the side of the hysterical. A Canadian diplomat apparently suggested the head of WikiLeaks should be assassinated, U.S. politicians claim that the organization has “blood” on their hands (a claim that the U.S. Department of Defense seems to contradict curiously) and there’s been much made of the Espionage Act of 1917.
The problem is that what WikiLeaks has done is NOT espionage under the intention of the Act. The original clearly exempted journalists from the definition. And well they might. A strong, even adversarial press is a vital part of the American way of life. We MUST have groups out there digging where the power brokers don’t want us and playing the role of muckraker. It is the single most effective balk on the misuse of power in a democracy. Consequently I am much more disturbed by our government putting the strong arm on American corporations to cut ties with WikiLeaks. There is a much greater threat to our liberties in those actions than in what has been released so far. And we better figure out how to deal with this new adjunct to the world of journalism since a new competing service called OpenLeaks is prepared to debut soon.
What the muckraker pulls up and pushes into our noses is often unpleasant but the role is one that has an honored and vital role in our national life. We shut then down at our own peril.
Call that the View From the Phlipside.
"The View From the Phlipside" airs on WRFA-LP Jamestown NY. You can listen to WRFA online HERE
Copyright - Jay Phillippi 2010
Wednesday, December 8, 2010
View From the Phlipside - R.I.P. Don Meredith
My name is Jay Phillippi and I've spent my life in and around the media. TV, Radio, the Movies and more. I love them and I hate them and I always have an opinion. Call this the View From the Phlipside.
Time to note the passing of a man who held an interesting place in American culture. Former quarterback and broadcaster Don Meredith passed away earlier this week at the age of 72.
“Dandy Don” holds an interesting place in our culture because he did it without being the very best. He will never be listed among the greatest college players of all time, nor in the NFL nor among broadcasters. He was good, don’t get me wrong, at times very good but that’s not usually the pass/fail for the kinds of work he did.
Meredith was a two time All American and three time Pro Bowl choice. He led the Cowboys to their first winning seasons and playoff victories. Meredith was the Cowboys first star quarterback and really their first star player of any kind. After his retirement in 1968 Meredith dabbled in the stock market before taking the job as the third voice in the booth for the fledgling Monday Night Football broadcasts.
It’s easy to forget that Monday Night Football was considered a gamble at first. In the second year the broadcast really found its magic formula and Meredith was an integral part of that. The original MNF team was Meredith, Howard Cosell and college broadcasting legend Keith Jackson. Jackson was replaced the following season by Frank Gifford and the classic team came together. Gifford provided rock solid play by play but it was the interplay between Cosell and Meredith that made the show a winner. Arrogant, verbose and decidedly big city Cosell versus the north Texas good ole boy Dandy Don. Meredith could hold his own with Cosell and that was the real key to success to the broadcast. Monday Night Football became an event largely because of the Cosell-Meredith match ups.
Curiously Meredith didn’t seem to realize what a great thing he was helping to create at first. After four seasons he left to work at rival NBC for three years. In his absence neither Fred Williamson nor Alex Karras managed the kind of interaction with Cosell. In 1977 Meredith returned and stayed till 1984 with his final broadcast being Super Bowl XIX.
It might be easy to brush Don Meredith aside as just a good time guy, a pretty fair quarterback with a quick wit. The reality is that he stands as a key element in the births of two great American cultural icons - the Dallas Cowboys and Monday Night Football. And that’s a much better than average legacy for any man.
Don Meredith passed away at age 72
Call that the View From the Phlipside.
"The View From the Phlipside" airs on WRFA-LP Jamestown NY. You can listen to WRFA online HERE
Copyright - Jay Phillippi 2010
Time to note the passing of a man who held an interesting place in American culture. Former quarterback and broadcaster Don Meredith passed away earlier this week at the age of 72.
“Dandy Don” holds an interesting place in our culture because he did it without being the very best. He will never be listed among the greatest college players of all time, nor in the NFL nor among broadcasters. He was good, don’t get me wrong, at times very good but that’s not usually the pass/fail for the kinds of work he did.
Meredith was a two time All American and three time Pro Bowl choice. He led the Cowboys to their first winning seasons and playoff victories. Meredith was the Cowboys first star quarterback and really their first star player of any kind. After his retirement in 1968 Meredith dabbled in the stock market before taking the job as the third voice in the booth for the fledgling Monday Night Football broadcasts.
It’s easy to forget that Monday Night Football was considered a gamble at first. In the second year the broadcast really found its magic formula and Meredith was an integral part of that. The original MNF team was Meredith, Howard Cosell and college broadcasting legend Keith Jackson. Jackson was replaced the following season by Frank Gifford and the classic team came together. Gifford provided rock solid play by play but it was the interplay between Cosell and Meredith that made the show a winner. Arrogant, verbose and decidedly big city Cosell versus the north Texas good ole boy Dandy Don. Meredith could hold his own with Cosell and that was the real key to success to the broadcast. Monday Night Football became an event largely because of the Cosell-Meredith match ups.
Curiously Meredith didn’t seem to realize what a great thing he was helping to create at first. After four seasons he left to work at rival NBC for three years. In his absence neither Fred Williamson nor Alex Karras managed the kind of interaction with Cosell. In 1977 Meredith returned and stayed till 1984 with his final broadcast being Super Bowl XIX.
It might be easy to brush Don Meredith aside as just a good time guy, a pretty fair quarterback with a quick wit. The reality is that he stands as a key element in the births of two great American cultural icons - the Dallas Cowboys and Monday Night Football. And that’s a much better than average legacy for any man.
Don Meredith passed away at age 72
Call that the View From the Phlipside.
"The View From the Phlipside" airs on WRFA-LP Jamestown NY. You can listen to WRFA online HERE
Copyright - Jay Phillippi 2010
Tuesday, December 7, 2010
View From the Phlipside - Jamestown Writes Update
My name is Jay Phillippi and I've spent my life in and around the media. TV, Radio, the Movies and more. I love them and I hate them and I always have an opinion. Call this the View From the Phlipside.
Almost two months ago a I mentioned a new media project that I was helping to launch and I promised that I wouldn’t make you listen to me talk about it every week through the project. Well phase one of Jamestown Writes has come an end and I thought I’d catch you up on it.
Jamestown Writes was/is a project to bring together writers in the Jamestown area. I partnered with my daughter Rachel as the facilitators and we used the National Novel Writing Month (NaNoWriMo) as our center piece. To be honest we had no idea how many people might be interested or really even how to go about running a writer’s group. In true Phillippi fashion we simply decided to make it up as we went along.
As it turned out my stroke severely limited my ability to be involved at pretty much any level for more than half of the project. Kudos to Rachel for stepping into a role with which she was not particularly comfortable and pulling it off. Because my recovery covered the entire time of the project I did zero writing. I’m happy to say that I am very much the exception in the group at large.
Jamestown Writes saw a total of 20 writers show up for at least one meeting. The group seemed to settle in between 6 and 10 regulars. And we had at least 4 writers complete the NaNoWriMo challenge of writing fifty thousand words of a novel in 30 days. We had several other writers make very serious runs at it as well. To be honest those numbers were much higher than we expected and it was a great start.
Because this little launch program was just a start. The group has decided to continue on. So if you’re a writer in the Jamestown area and you’re looking for a writer’s support group we’d like to invite you to join us. The group is still feeling it’s way along as to an identity but we’ll certainly be looking at the both the creative side and the professional side of writing. For the moment we’ll be meeting starting at 10 AM the first and third Saturdays of each month on the second floor of the Arts Council building on Third Street in Jamestown. We welcome writers of all types, formats and genres.
Call that the View From the Phlipside.
"The View From the Phlipside" airs on WRFA-LP Jamestown NY. You can listen to WRFA online HERE
Copyright - Jay Phillippi 2010
Almost two months ago a I mentioned a new media project that I was helping to launch and I promised that I wouldn’t make you listen to me talk about it every week through the project. Well phase one of Jamestown Writes has come an end and I thought I’d catch you up on it.
Jamestown Writes was/is a project to bring together writers in the Jamestown area. I partnered with my daughter Rachel as the facilitators and we used the National Novel Writing Month (NaNoWriMo) as our center piece. To be honest we had no idea how many people might be interested or really even how to go about running a writer’s group. In true Phillippi fashion we simply decided to make it up as we went along.
As it turned out my stroke severely limited my ability to be involved at pretty much any level for more than half of the project. Kudos to Rachel for stepping into a role with which she was not particularly comfortable and pulling it off. Because my recovery covered the entire time of the project I did zero writing. I’m happy to say that I am very much the exception in the group at large.
Jamestown Writes saw a total of 20 writers show up for at least one meeting. The group seemed to settle in between 6 and 10 regulars. And we had at least 4 writers complete the NaNoWriMo challenge of writing fifty thousand words of a novel in 30 days. We had several other writers make very serious runs at it as well. To be honest those numbers were much higher than we expected and it was a great start.
Because this little launch program was just a start. The group has decided to continue on. So if you’re a writer in the Jamestown area and you’re looking for a writer’s support group we’d like to invite you to join us. The group is still feeling it’s way along as to an identity but we’ll certainly be looking at the both the creative side and the professional side of writing. For the moment we’ll be meeting starting at 10 AM the first and third Saturdays of each month on the second floor of the Arts Council building on Third Street in Jamestown. We welcome writers of all types, formats and genres.
Call that the View From the Phlipside.
"The View From the Phlipside" airs on WRFA-LP Jamestown NY. You can listen to WRFA online HERE
Copyright - Jay Phillippi 2010
Monday, December 6, 2010
View From the Phlipside - Harry Potter
My name is Jay Phillippi and I've spent my life in and around the media. TV, Radio, the Movies and more. I love them and I hate them and I always have an opinion. Call this the View From the Phlipside.
I don’t do a lot of “reviews” on this program. There’s just too many movies and TV shows and too many other things to talk about. But the furor that has cropped up around the newest Harry Potter movie has caught my attention.
Let’s get something straight right up front. I know not everyone is a fan of Harry Potter. Some folks have their religious sensibilities offended. Some folks have their literary sensibilities offended. All well and good. If you don’t like the story then don’t read the books or see the movie. The folks that are annoying me seem to be from a new category. They don’t have anything against the basic story line at all but they are all up in arms about the newest movie. It’s interesting to note that some of the most respected names in the movie critic world appear to be among them.
The complaint is that the latest movie “Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 1” isn’t a classic, complete movie. In other words the basic story line doesn’t come to a nice clean ending. Every time I hear that complaint I just shake my head. Folks the movie says, right in the title, that this is only part, Part 1, of a longer story. So apparently the screenwriter was supposed to create some kind of artificial ending to make the movie purists happy. The movie ends at a perfectly logical point in the story with a nice cliff hanger. I find the complaints about the movie to be elitist snobbery.
There is another group of critics that amaze me. These are folks who either haven’t read the books or seen the previous movies and then complain that they don’t understand what’s going on. Well duh. I’m not sure if this scores higher on the arrogance scale or the stupidity scale. There have been just over 900 minutes of on screen story telling before you reach this movie, the 7th in a series of 8. You haven’t done your homework as it were but want all of us to stop and catch you up. I don’t think so. If you don’t have the background the story there is a way to figure out what’s going on. Go with someone who has seen all the movies and then ask them questions every time you can’t figure out what’s going on.
That’ll work fine right up to the point when the usher throws you out.
Call that the View From the Phlipside.
"The View From the Phlipside" airs on WRFA-LP Jamestown NY. You can listen to WRFA online HERE
Copyright - Jay Phillippi 2010
I don’t do a lot of “reviews” on this program. There’s just too many movies and TV shows and too many other things to talk about. But the furor that has cropped up around the newest Harry Potter movie has caught my attention.
Let’s get something straight right up front. I know not everyone is a fan of Harry Potter. Some folks have their religious sensibilities offended. Some folks have their literary sensibilities offended. All well and good. If you don’t like the story then don’t read the books or see the movie. The folks that are annoying me seem to be from a new category. They don’t have anything against the basic story line at all but they are all up in arms about the newest movie. It’s interesting to note that some of the most respected names in the movie critic world appear to be among them.
The complaint is that the latest movie “Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 1” isn’t a classic, complete movie. In other words the basic story line doesn’t come to a nice clean ending. Every time I hear that complaint I just shake my head. Folks the movie says, right in the title, that this is only part, Part 1, of a longer story. So apparently the screenwriter was supposed to create some kind of artificial ending to make the movie purists happy. The movie ends at a perfectly logical point in the story with a nice cliff hanger. I find the complaints about the movie to be elitist snobbery.
There is another group of critics that amaze me. These are folks who either haven’t read the books or seen the previous movies and then complain that they don’t understand what’s going on. Well duh. I’m not sure if this scores higher on the arrogance scale or the stupidity scale. There have been just over 900 minutes of on screen story telling before you reach this movie, the 7th in a series of 8. You haven’t done your homework as it were but want all of us to stop and catch you up. I don’t think so. If you don’t have the background the story there is a way to figure out what’s going on. Go with someone who has seen all the movies and then ask them questions every time you can’t figure out what’s going on.
That’ll work fine right up to the point when the usher throws you out.
Call that the View From the Phlipside.
"The View From the Phlipside" airs on WRFA-LP Jamestown NY. You can listen to WRFA online HERE
Copyright - Jay Phillippi 2010
Friday, December 3, 2010
Stroke stories - Moving Forward
This will probably be the last story in this series. I'm about 90-95% back to normal. I've started back at the gym, the headaches have faded to tiny little things that come and go. Honestly I go hours without any trace of them.
When I passed my post-stroke physical my doctor told me that 25% of everyone who has the kind of stroke I did never get a definitive diagnosis of the cause. That's my situation. Nobody knows why it happened. They assure me there's no reason to expect that it would ever happen again. She wanted to know if I was OK with that kind of uncertainty.
I am.
Here's what I've decided. Early on I rejected the concept that I was a stroke "victim". I'm a stroke survivor. I don't know how or why it happened or that I survived. I did. Every day is a bonus day from now on. I want to do everything I can to remember that and live my life that way. The day and time of the stroke is now loaded into my calendar as an annual event. So that I never forget. I have wonderful friends that I neglect. When I needed them they were there with concern and support. I want to be a better friend. I want to be better family, and co-worker. I want to be a better me, rather than just sliding along watching my days wander aimlessly by. Oh, and yes I still intend to make aimless wandering part of my life too.
While I was in the hospital I kept hearing this song. And it moved me to tears every time. So it is the theme song for post stroke life. "Season of Love: the opening tune from the musical "Rent" I keep a note on the monitor of my home computer (that's where this adventure began) that reads "525,600 Minutes. Is this a before day or after?"
How do you measure a year? How do you measure a year in a life? How about love?
Thanks be to God for these extra days, and the love of friend and family.
Peace
When I passed my post-stroke physical my doctor told me that 25% of everyone who has the kind of stroke I did never get a definitive diagnosis of the cause. That's my situation. Nobody knows why it happened. They assure me there's no reason to expect that it would ever happen again. She wanted to know if I was OK with that kind of uncertainty.
I am.
Here's what I've decided. Early on I rejected the concept that I was a stroke "victim". I'm a stroke survivor. I don't know how or why it happened or that I survived. I did. Every day is a bonus day from now on. I want to do everything I can to remember that and live my life that way. The day and time of the stroke is now loaded into my calendar as an annual event. So that I never forget. I have wonderful friends that I neglect. When I needed them they were there with concern and support. I want to be a better friend. I want to be better family, and co-worker. I want to be a better me, rather than just sliding along watching my days wander aimlessly by. Oh, and yes I still intend to make aimless wandering part of my life too.
While I was in the hospital I kept hearing this song. And it moved me to tears every time. So it is the theme song for post stroke life. "Season of Love: the opening tune from the musical "Rent" I keep a note on the monitor of my home computer (that's where this adventure began) that reads "525,600 Minutes. Is this a before day or after?"
How do you measure a year? How do you measure a year in a life? How about love?
Thanks be to God for these extra days, and the love of friend and family.
Peace
Tuesday, November 30, 2010
View From the Phlipside - Facebook E-mail
My name is Jay Phillippi and I've spent my life in and around the media. TV, Radio, the Movies and more. I love them and I hate them and I always have an opinion. Call this the View From the Phlipside.
If there is one thing that the world wide web seems to be really, REALLY good at doing it’s coming up with products and/or services that don’t seem to have any reason for existing. Most recently we saw Google launch then kill the service called Wave. Wave was designed to create some kind of super sharing work space where you could bring together all kinds communications in the same place for some glorious cause. The problem became that most of us couldn’t find a reason to use it. So Google pulled the plug.
For me the latest in the “So What Do I Do With This?” derby has to be Facebook’s e-mail service that isn’t an e-mail service. Yes, you get a Facebook e-mail account but it’s not really e-mail Mark Zuckerberg assures us. It’s MORE. I’ll grant him that but I’m still trying to figure out - more what?
Once again the idea is to bring all kinds of things all together in one nice big pile. You’ll get your Facebook messages, e-mails, texts and chat sessions all in one place. Plus you’ll get histories of all your conversations stored by person so now you can track everything you’ve ever said. And the system will give priority to your Facebook friends (and their friends) and consign everyone else to a separate file.
The idea is that this will make your life simpler bycreating a single messaging system. What I see as I look at this is anything but. My email is clogged enough with various items, newsletters and other stuff I need to keep an eye on as it is. I don’t want my Facebook messages mixed in with the important stuff . I am sure it will shock Mr. Zuckerberg to discover I place a significantly lower importance to Facebook in my life. I don’t want my texts in here at all since they are almost always time sensitive, I get them, I respond and I never want to look at most of them again. Instead they will now be even more dead wood to be cleared away.
Oh and the Facebook e-mail function won’t have all the functions of a REAL e-mail service so it’s not even going to eliminate accounts for me.
So here we go once again. A fabulous new service for which there really doesn’t appear to be any need. As if my life isn’t complicated enough already.
Call that the View From the Phlipside.
If there is one thing that the world wide web seems to be really, REALLY good at doing it’s coming up with products and/or services that don’t seem to have any reason for existing. Most recently we saw Google launch then kill the service called Wave. Wave was designed to create some kind of super sharing work space where you could bring together all kinds communications in the same place for some glorious cause. The problem became that most of us couldn’t find a reason to use it. So Google pulled the plug.
For me the latest in the “So What Do I Do With This?” derby has to be Facebook’s e-mail service that isn’t an e-mail service. Yes, you get a Facebook e-mail account but it’s not really e-mail Mark Zuckerberg assures us. It’s MORE. I’ll grant him that but I’m still trying to figure out - more what?
Once again the idea is to bring all kinds of things all together in one nice big pile. You’ll get your Facebook messages, e-mails, texts and chat sessions all in one place. Plus you’ll get histories of all your conversations stored by person so now you can track everything you’ve ever said. And the system will give priority to your Facebook friends (and their friends) and consign everyone else to a separate file.
The idea is that this will make your life simpler bycreating a single messaging system. What I see as I look at this is anything but. My email is clogged enough with various items, newsletters and other stuff I need to keep an eye on as it is. I don’t want my Facebook messages mixed in with the important stuff . I am sure it will shock Mr. Zuckerberg to discover I place a significantly lower importance to Facebook in my life. I don’t want my texts in here at all since they are almost always time sensitive, I get them, I respond and I never want to look at most of them again. Instead they will now be even more dead wood to be cleared away.
Oh and the Facebook e-mail function won’t have all the functions of a REAL e-mail service so it’s not even going to eliminate accounts for me.
So here we go once again. A fabulous new service for which there really doesn’t appear to be any need. As if my life isn’t complicated enough already.
Call that the View From the Phlipside.
View From the Phlipside - Toyota Tundra ads
My name is Jay Phillippi and I've spent my life in and around the media. TV, Radio, the Movies and more. I love them and I hate them and I always have an opinion. Call this the View From the Phlipside.
Given the number of times that I’ve taken an ad campaign to task on this program it would probably only be fair for me to hand out the occasional pat on the back for ads that I think go above and beyond as well. Let me note that I’m not endorsing any product or service here, I’m just saying the ad campaign does a really nice job.
In this day of computer graphics and special effects I tend to just yawn when I see something spectacular on an TV commercial. I just assume it’s not real and that takes a fair amount of the “thrill” away for me. Starting a couple years ago I began to notice one campaign that was very careful to note that these were “Actual Demonstration”s. The first couple times I saw it my reaction was “Really?”. But after three years atleast I need to give the nod to the folks on the Toyota Tundra ad campaign. Tundra is Toyota’s big pick up truck and that market is a tough one. Virtually all of the makers spend their advertising money trying to prove to us how tough they are. Toyota has taken it one step further.
Remember the truck running up the teeter totter with a ten thousand pound load behind it? Accelerating to 60 miles an hour through a closing steel door then slamming on the brakes before it plunged off the end of the ramp into the canyon? How about racing between two swinging arms? Every one of was an actual demonstration, not CGI magic. Over the weekend I caught the newest one, which involved pulling a heavy load up a spiral ramp surrounded by flames. This apparently was the Toyota Super Bowl spot this year but I honestly don’t remember seeing it. I have no use for a heavy duty pick up truck but I can’t take my eyes off of these commercials. What they are doing is really impressive and really dangerous. I’m sure they have all the safety precautions in place and have done all the figuring before hand but even so. The spots are the work of ad giant Saatchi and Saatchi.
These spots have real “Wow” factor and they do it without cheating. They make you watch spots for a product that you’ll probably never actually buy. And the memory of the spots stick with you. That’s some great advertising. We don’t see nearly enough commercials this good.
Call that the View From the Phlipside.
Given the number of times that I’ve taken an ad campaign to task on this program it would probably only be fair for me to hand out the occasional pat on the back for ads that I think go above and beyond as well. Let me note that I’m not endorsing any product or service here, I’m just saying the ad campaign does a really nice job.
In this day of computer graphics and special effects I tend to just yawn when I see something spectacular on an TV commercial. I just assume it’s not real and that takes a fair amount of the “thrill” away for me. Starting a couple years ago I began to notice one campaign that was very careful to note that these were “Actual Demonstration”s. The first couple times I saw it my reaction was “Really?”. But after three years atleast I need to give the nod to the folks on the Toyota Tundra ad campaign. Tundra is Toyota’s big pick up truck and that market is a tough one. Virtually all of the makers spend their advertising money trying to prove to us how tough they are. Toyota has taken it one step further.
Remember the truck running up the teeter totter with a ten thousand pound load behind it? Accelerating to 60 miles an hour through a closing steel door then slamming on the brakes before it plunged off the end of the ramp into the canyon? How about racing between two swinging arms? Every one of was an actual demonstration, not CGI magic. Over the weekend I caught the newest one, which involved pulling a heavy load up a spiral ramp surrounded by flames. This apparently was the Toyota Super Bowl spot this year but I honestly don’t remember seeing it. I have no use for a heavy duty pick up truck but I can’t take my eyes off of these commercials. What they are doing is really impressive and really dangerous. I’m sure they have all the safety precautions in place and have done all the figuring before hand but even so. The spots are the work of ad giant Saatchi and Saatchi.
These spots have real “Wow” factor and they do it without cheating. They make you watch spots for a product that you’ll probably never actually buy. And the memory of the spots stick with you. That’s some great advertising. We don’t see nearly enough commercials this good.
Call that the View From the Phlipside.
Monday, November 29, 2010
View From the Phlipside - Top Gear U.S.
My name is Jay Phillippi and I've spent my life in and around the media. TV, Radio, the Movies and more. I love them and I hate them and I always have an opinion. Call this the View From the Phlipside.
American TV has a long history of borrowing program ideas from other countries or genres. “All In the Family” is the example of such an adaptation done perfectly. The basic concept of the the British orginal and the American version is virtually identical. What made “All In the Family” a winner was that the characters and situations were made uniquely American. In doing that they created a show that could stand on its own without feeling like a cheap imitation.
So there was both a certain amount of excitement and a certain apprehension when I heard that one of my favorite shows was being brought to the U.S.. “Top Gear” is an amazing international hit that has wracked up awards in both the U.K. and the States. If you’re not familiar with it’s a show about cars that appeals even to people who aren’t really into cars. The reason for its success is simple, the interplay between the three presenters (as they are labeled by our British cousins) - Jeremy Clarkson, Richard Hammond and James May (or as they are referred to by the ladies in my family - the tall one, the cute one and the slow one). They are grown up boys playing with toys and having a great time with it all.
Now there is nothing more American than cars, so a “Top Gear U.S.” would seem an obvious winner. Based on the first episode which aired last week on the History Channel, not so much.
And they fail for the same reason that the original version succeeds. Chemistry among the hosts. Our guys don’t have it. They strike me as frat boys with depth neither of personality or knowledge of cars. I grew up in a car family. I had to learn to change the oil and the tires before I was allowed to drive my father’s cars. I know car guys when I see them. And these three, racing driver Tanner Foust, comedian Adam Ferrara and racing analyst Rutledge Wood, just fall flat. Add in that the U.S. show slavishly imitates every aspect of the original and this one is a dead loss. Even their names are wrong. The ENGLISH guys should be Tanner, Adam and Rutledge, not the Americans.
How bad is it? NBC took a pass on the show. If the worst network in America isn’t interested someone should have taken notice. Call “Top Gear U.S.” a tow truck and take it straight to the junk yard.
Call that the View From the Phlipside.
American TV has a long history of borrowing program ideas from other countries or genres. “All In the Family” is the example of such an adaptation done perfectly. The basic concept of the the British orginal and the American version is virtually identical. What made “All In the Family” a winner was that the characters and situations were made uniquely American. In doing that they created a show that could stand on its own without feeling like a cheap imitation.
So there was both a certain amount of excitement and a certain apprehension when I heard that one of my favorite shows was being brought to the U.S.. “Top Gear” is an amazing international hit that has wracked up awards in both the U.K. and the States. If you’re not familiar with it’s a show about cars that appeals even to people who aren’t really into cars. The reason for its success is simple, the interplay between the three presenters (as they are labeled by our British cousins) - Jeremy Clarkson, Richard Hammond and James May (or as they are referred to by the ladies in my family - the tall one, the cute one and the slow one). They are grown up boys playing with toys and having a great time with it all.
Now there is nothing more American than cars, so a “Top Gear U.S.” would seem an obvious winner. Based on the first episode which aired last week on the History Channel, not so much.
And they fail for the same reason that the original version succeeds. Chemistry among the hosts. Our guys don’t have it. They strike me as frat boys with depth neither of personality or knowledge of cars. I grew up in a car family. I had to learn to change the oil and the tires before I was allowed to drive my father’s cars. I know car guys when I see them. And these three, racing driver Tanner Foust, comedian Adam Ferrara and racing analyst Rutledge Wood, just fall flat. Add in that the U.S. show slavishly imitates every aspect of the original and this one is a dead loss. Even their names are wrong. The ENGLISH guys should be Tanner, Adam and Rutledge, not the Americans.
How bad is it? NBC took a pass on the show. If the worst network in America isn’t interested someone should have taken notice. Call “Top Gear U.S.” a tow truck and take it straight to the junk yard.
Call that the View From the Phlipside.
Saturday, November 27, 2010
Movie Time!
I've gotten a little behind in chronicling my movie watching so it's time to catch up. I'll keep them short(er) than usual.
August Rush - (2007) This is a lightweight little movie about fighting for what you believe. The plot suffers from fairly large holes but the performances almost balance it out. I'll usually watch anything that Robin Williams is in (even though he burns me as often as not these days. He picks interesting stuff). If you want something that will make you feel good with a big if somewhat unbelievable Hollywood ending then just leave your logical side at the door and enjoy. Some really good music in this. And Keri Russell is worth my time just to look at.
Don Juan de Marco - (1994) I'll pretty much watch anything Johnny Depp is in too. He takes interesting risks as an actor. This is a romance that happens to focus on a young mental patient and his doctor (played by Marlon Brando). I won't give away the ending but if fantasy was more interesting and fulfilling than reality which would you choose? And are you sure you can tell the difference? Often labeled a chick flick I liked it. But then the older character of the doctor and his wife (Faye Dunaway) may be speaking to me.
The Astronaut Farmer - (2006) So if you really could live out your dreams but everyone thought you were crazy would you give up? It may seem like I'm on a theme here but it was total happenstance that I saw these movies within days of one another. Billy Bob Thornton plays a former engineer who always wanted to go into space but family obligations got in the way. Add in the August Rush "follow your dreams" theme and you're there. A fun movie with some flaws but worth the ride. Which sums up the plot as well, LOL!
Quantum of Solace - (2008) Daniel Craig back as 007 and great fun once again. This is drawn from a Fleming short story and is the beginning of the Bond mythos. I had a few small quibbles with the movie but only and few and they were small. Could have used a bit less action/explosion footage but we're probably stuck with it as the next generation of movie fans have been taught that it's actually entertaining. It's not, it's tedious and repetitive but there you are. I'm actually kind of looking forward to the next Craig Bond movie. One final curmudgeonly comment - the Bond girls used to be a LOT better looking.
The Simpsons Movie - (2007) What is there to say? If you love "The Simpsons" you probably loved the movie. I do and I did. Pretty much exactly what you would expect.
The Trouble with Harry - (1955) What a hoot of a movie. Harry's dead. And that's the trouble, no one is quite sure what to do about him. Alfred Hitchcock directs this comedy (yes, flat out comedy as only Hitch could make it) starring Shirley McClaine(her first picture), John Forsythe, Edmund Gwenn and Jerry Mathers (the Beav!). This is one (and probably the least well known) of the " 5 Lost Hitchcocks" that only came back into public view after 30 years in the wilderness (the others are "Rear Window", "The Man Who Knew Too Much", "Rope" and "Vertigo") Too much fun to pass on, find it and watch it.
Hearts in Atlantis - (2001) A Stephen King story brought to the screen. I really like the performances and I like the story (a young boys life changed by a mysterious man who comes into his life for a short time). Yet somehow the movie just feels like it comes up short. It's a story about being different and being true and living with memories and dreams that get broken by reality. Certainly worth a quiet weekend's viewing. Only "name" is Anthony Hopkins although if your eyes are sharp you may recognize Anton Yelchin as the boy (he played Chekov in the latest Star Trek movie)
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, Part 1 - (2010) In the classic sense this is not a complete movie. It's basically all exposition for Part 2 which arrives in the first half of next year. That seems to really bother some people. Don't count me among them. It was nice to see a little more character growth in the three main characters. The books grew darker and more complex as they went along and so do the movies. Enjoyed this a great deal and am very much waiting for the final installment.
RED - (2010) Take a great cast, give them a fun script and then stand back and let them have a hell of a good time working together. That's the idea of "RED" the story of a group of retired Black Ops CIA operatives (and one clerk from the government retirement fund) who get marked for elimination. Bruce Willis, John Malkovich, Helen Mirren, Morgan Freeman, Karl Urban, Richard Dreyfuss and Ernest Borgnine (yeah, I thought he was dead too). Come on how could you NOT have fun with this cast? Just way, way, WAAAAAAY too much fun. Don't miss this one.
August Rush - (2007) This is a lightweight little movie about fighting for what you believe. The plot suffers from fairly large holes but the performances almost balance it out. I'll usually watch anything that Robin Williams is in (even though he burns me as often as not these days. He picks interesting stuff). If you want something that will make you feel good with a big if somewhat unbelievable Hollywood ending then just leave your logical side at the door and enjoy. Some really good music in this. And Keri Russell is worth my time just to look at.
Don Juan de Marco - (1994) I'll pretty much watch anything Johnny Depp is in too. He takes interesting risks as an actor. This is a romance that happens to focus on a young mental patient and his doctor (played by Marlon Brando). I won't give away the ending but if fantasy was more interesting and fulfilling than reality which would you choose? And are you sure you can tell the difference? Often labeled a chick flick I liked it. But then the older character of the doctor and his wife (Faye Dunaway) may be speaking to me.
The Astronaut Farmer - (2006) So if you really could live out your dreams but everyone thought you were crazy would you give up? It may seem like I'm on a theme here but it was total happenstance that I saw these movies within days of one another. Billy Bob Thornton plays a former engineer who always wanted to go into space but family obligations got in the way. Add in the August Rush "follow your dreams" theme and you're there. A fun movie with some flaws but worth the ride. Which sums up the plot as well, LOL!
Quantum of Solace - (2008) Daniel Craig back as 007 and great fun once again. This is drawn from a Fleming short story and is the beginning of the Bond mythos. I had a few small quibbles with the movie but only and few and they were small. Could have used a bit less action/explosion footage but we're probably stuck with it as the next generation of movie fans have been taught that it's actually entertaining. It's not, it's tedious and repetitive but there you are. I'm actually kind of looking forward to the next Craig Bond movie. One final curmudgeonly comment - the Bond girls used to be a LOT better looking.
The Simpsons Movie - (2007) What is there to say? If you love "The Simpsons" you probably loved the movie. I do and I did. Pretty much exactly what you would expect.
The Trouble with Harry - (1955) What a hoot of a movie. Harry's dead. And that's the trouble, no one is quite sure what to do about him. Alfred Hitchcock directs this comedy (yes, flat out comedy as only Hitch could make it) starring Shirley McClaine(her first picture), John Forsythe, Edmund Gwenn and Jerry Mathers (the Beav!). This is one (and probably the least well known) of the " 5 Lost Hitchcocks" that only came back into public view after 30 years in the wilderness (the others are "Rear Window", "The Man Who Knew Too Much", "Rope" and "Vertigo") Too much fun to pass on, find it and watch it.
Hearts in Atlantis - (2001) A Stephen King story brought to the screen. I really like the performances and I like the story (a young boys life changed by a mysterious man who comes into his life for a short time). Yet somehow the movie just feels like it comes up short. It's a story about being different and being true and living with memories and dreams that get broken by reality. Certainly worth a quiet weekend's viewing. Only "name" is Anthony Hopkins although if your eyes are sharp you may recognize Anton Yelchin as the boy (he played Chekov in the latest Star Trek movie)
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, Part 1 - (2010) In the classic sense this is not a complete movie. It's basically all exposition for Part 2 which arrives in the first half of next year. That seems to really bother some people. Don't count me among them. It was nice to see a little more character growth in the three main characters. The books grew darker and more complex as they went along and so do the movies. Enjoyed this a great deal and am very much waiting for the final installment.
RED - (2010) Take a great cast, give them a fun script and then stand back and let them have a hell of a good time working together. That's the idea of "RED" the story of a group of retired Black Ops CIA operatives (and one clerk from the government retirement fund) who get marked for elimination. Bruce Willis, John Malkovich, Helen Mirren, Morgan Freeman, Karl Urban, Richard Dreyfuss and Ernest Borgnine (yeah, I thought he was dead too). Come on how could you NOT have fun with this cast? Just way, way, WAAAAAAY too much fun. Don't miss this one.
Monday, November 15, 2010
Stroke stories - The Virtue I Lack
Patience.
Everyone keeps reminding me. Healing, particularly of a serious problem, takes time. Take the time you need to heal, take it easy, don't push too hard, too soon, too fast. Be patient.
Yeah, well...
Every day is different. One day I feel good, the next day I'm wiped out. Is the overall trend towards getting better? Without a doubt. Is it less than three weeks since the bomb went off in my head? Yep, it'll be three weeks tomorrow.
So where am I? I still have a very light headache every day. Could be the last remnants of the stroke or could be side effect of the drugs. I still take two pills every four hours. That will end tomorrow at 11 PM. Which means I might actually get a full night's sleep tomorrow night. That would be a first since the stroke. Not surprisingly I'm tired to one degree or another all the time. Some days are better than others. On the good days I try to do a little more and the next day I'm wiped out again.
The cumulative effect is that I don't feel like I really want to do much of anything about half the time. The other half is spent trying to do things that won't totally wipe me out. I did four things this past weekend - went to a two hour meeting where I could just sit quietly, went to church where I could just sit quietly, walked the local mall and went to a youth event where I mostly just sat quietly. Woke up this morning feeling like I'd spent the weekend working out.
Sigh.
Patience. Taking things slow. Not expecting too much too soon. My hope now is that I'll be closer to my "usual" self by the new year. That would be about 2.5 months. I have to be honest and say that even that might be optimistic. So now I'm trying to learn patience. A little bit each day.
In the end I have no choice. I can only go as far and as fast as my body allows. The goal is not to get well fast but to get well. Doing it right means taking the time I need.
Patience.
Everyone keeps reminding me. Healing, particularly of a serious problem, takes time. Take the time you need to heal, take it easy, don't push too hard, too soon, too fast. Be patient.
Yeah, well...
Every day is different. One day I feel good, the next day I'm wiped out. Is the overall trend towards getting better? Without a doubt. Is it less than three weeks since the bomb went off in my head? Yep, it'll be three weeks tomorrow.
So where am I? I still have a very light headache every day. Could be the last remnants of the stroke or could be side effect of the drugs. I still take two pills every four hours. That will end tomorrow at 11 PM. Which means I might actually get a full night's sleep tomorrow night. That would be a first since the stroke. Not surprisingly I'm tired to one degree or another all the time. Some days are better than others. On the good days I try to do a little more and the next day I'm wiped out again.
The cumulative effect is that I don't feel like I really want to do much of anything about half the time. The other half is spent trying to do things that won't totally wipe me out. I did four things this past weekend - went to a two hour meeting where I could just sit quietly, went to church where I could just sit quietly, walked the local mall and went to a youth event where I mostly just sat quietly. Woke up this morning feeling like I'd spent the weekend working out.
Sigh.
Patience. Taking things slow. Not expecting too much too soon. My hope now is that I'll be closer to my "usual" self by the new year. That would be about 2.5 months. I have to be honest and say that even that might be optimistic. So now I'm trying to learn patience. A little bit each day.
In the end I have no choice. I can only go as far and as fast as my body allows. The goal is not to get well fast but to get well. Doing it right means taking the time I need.
Patience.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)