Showing posts with label Internet. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Internet. Show all posts

Friday, January 24, 2014

Net Neutrality, Adult Monster and RIP Russell Johnson



 "The View From the Phlipside" is a media commentary program airing on WRFA-LP, Jamestown NY.  It can be heard Monday through Friday just after 8 AM and 5 PM.  The following are scripts which may not exactly match the aired version of the program.  Mostly because the host may suddenly choose to add or subtract words at a moments notice.  WRFA-LP is not responsible for any such silliness or the opinions expressed.  You can listen to a live stream of WRFA or find a podcast of this program at wrfalp.com.  Copyright 2013 by Jay Phillippi.  All Rights Reserved.  You like what you see?  Drop me a line and we can talk.

Program scripts from week of January 20, 2014


My name is Jay Phillippi and I've spent my life in and around the media.  TV, radio, the movies and more.  I love them, and I hate them and I always have an opinion.  Call this the View from the Phlipside. 

RIP Russell Johnson                                                                                            

For an actor there’s always the question of whether you really want a role that will stay with you for the rest of your career.  That Captain Kirk or Doctor Who role that will make your name familiar to virtually everyone but might just limit your future roles because they will always see as THAT character.

If you’re leading actor it can probably be survived.  I mean Bill Shatner has had several more big time character since the original Star Trek went off the air.  If you’re a character actor it can be more of a problem.  Your bread and butter is disappearing into supporting roles and it can be tough if everyone says “Wait, it’s so and so!”

So when I saw that Russell Johnson had passed away last week I wondered how he’d done after his iconic role.  Johnson played the Professor on the ‘60s classic TV show “Gilligan’s Island” (Do you know the character’s real name?  I had to look it up.  Roy Hinkley).  A quick check showed me that Johnson had a solid career before becoming a castaway and an equally solid one after.

Johnson was born in northeastern Pennsylvania, served in World War II as a B-24 crew member and was awarded a variety of medals including the Purple Heart.  By 1952 he had begun his Hollywood career and it was a career where he worked with a lot of interesting people including Audie Murphy, George Raft, Ronald Reagan and Robert Redford.  He also appeared in a lot of popular TV shows through the years including “The Twilight Zone”, “Lassie”, “Lou Grant”, “Dallas”, “McGyver”, “Dynasty” and “Alf” among many, many others.

There was always a big question surrounding his best known character.  If the Professor could make almost anything out of bamboo and coconuts why couldn’t he fix the boat and get them off the island?  Johnson was asked that question for years.  His answer was simple.  Boat building was not among the Professor’s skills.

With Johnson’s death only two members of the original cast still survive.  Curiously they are the two at the center of the longest running discussion concerning the show - Ginger or Mary Ann?

While I’m a Mary Ann guy all the way I can’t tell you who was the Professor’s favorite.

Russell Johnson was 89 years old.


Adult Monster                                                                                                    

Today’s show comes with a little bit of a warning upfront.  I will be extremely discreet but it’s still a topic you probably won’t want to have to explain to small children.  In fact I am relying on the intelligence of the WRFA listenership to fill in a LOT in the set up of this story.  Because quite simply, this story is weird.

We are discussing a certain genre of adult literature normally referred to by a four letter word that begins with the letter “P”.  Now maybe you’re thinking I’m being overly cautious.  This kind of material has even gone mainstream through titles like “50 Shades of Gray”.  But that’s pretty tame compared to the topic at hand.  Take the “P word” and put the word “monster” in front of it.  As in it involves Bigfoot or Pterodactyls.

The bad news is I’m not kidding.  The good news is we’re going to talk about something else from now on.

The upside of the brave new digital publishing world is that it’s allowing many more authors to get their work before an audience and, hopefully, make some money.  Titles that won’t generate enough sales to interest a major publisher can actually be quite successful at the self-published level because so much of even a modest sales price goes to profit.  The overhead can be virtually zero.

Of course the artistic value of a lot of these books can be virtually zero as well.  But that’s fine, there’s very little money on the line for anyone.

The amazing thing about the books in question here is that they’re actually selling pretty well.  Well enough that one author brings in anywhere from six thousand to thirty thousand dollars a month in sales.  Enough that she has funded her daughter’s college education with the proceeds.  At least she was until folks like Amazon were shocked, shocked do you hear to discover they were selling this sort of thing.  They began pulling the books from the listings claiming they somehow violated their extremely vague content guidelines.

You couldn’t pay me to read these books.  But I think the folks at the major online outlets that handle self published books are kidding themselves if they think this is going to go away. 

They may want to call this kind of publishing a monster.  But it’s a monster they’ve helped to create.

Net Neutrality                                                                                                                           

You may have recently heard that the Internet as we have come to know and love it is coming to an end.  All delivered in properly apocalyptic prose certain Chicken Littles are declaring that the sky is falling.

The truth is somewhat more complicated than that.  The discussion revolves around a concept called “Net Neutrality” and it was the subject of a court decision a week or so ago.

First, let’s define “net neutrality” in case you’re not clear on the concept.  It means that everybody gets treated the same on the World Wide Web.  So you, the consumer, can access my blog just the same as you access your streaming videos on Netflix.  Your Internet Service Provider (ISP) can’t charge you more to visit certain sites over other sites.  It’s all “neutral”.

The problem comes up that treating all web sites equally isn’t really fair because, well, they’re not all equal.  My blog has a small but dedicated readership.  At peak hours Netflix accounts for 32% of total traffic according to some studies.  Believe it or not there are limitations to how much traffic the Internet can bear.  So the ISPs would like the big bandwidth users, like Netflix, to pay a little more.

A lot of the furor has to do with how much more and who would pay it.

But that’s not the only issue.  If net neutrality goes bye bye it actually opens up all kinds of potential issues that would make life on the Internet less pleasant.  We’ve seen the kind of stupid games that get played between cable channels and the service providers.  Channels being blacked out and endless finger pointing.  Well without net neutrality the same thing could happen with services on the Internet.  Suddenly there’s some kind of argument and service to those sites suddenly slooooooows down.

In reality the final word is a long way from being spoken on this subject.  The FCC can still appeal the current court decision including taking it eventually to the Supreme Court.  Or they could re-write the regulations to suit the current ruling or get around the current ruling.  Or Congress could decide to change the law.

But what I can say without any great fear of contradiction is that stories of the Internet’s demise are decidedly premature.


Call that the View From the Phlipside

Wednesday, January 1, 2014

And On to a New Year

So this is 2014?
Nice.
So far, at least.

Let's get started this year with some thought about why we do what we do and what we are going to do this.

This blog will continue to be "home base" for my radio show "The View From the Phlipside" (now airing M-F at 8 AM and 5 PM on WRFA-LP, Jamestown, NY).  I haven't noted in a while that what you see is the relatively rough scripts that I write each week.  I spend a little time cleaning them up but I just don't have the time and energy to turn them into proper essays.  When I record them I count on my ability to shape them as I go along.  This results in some convoluted sentence structure in the scripts and some missing punctuation and grammar points.  They are what they are and they are written to be spoken aloud.

I will continue to offer some reviews of movies and books.  My focus will be more on older materials.  The reason for this is that there is plenty of contemporary reviews of new media.  The hope of these reviews has always been that I can point people to things that they may not know or may know but aren't sure if they would like.  For all the media that is created new in this age there is still a massive backlog of things too good to simply fall away.  Because I don't get to see as many new movies in the theater as I'd like I'll still watch and review newer stuff too.  But the focus will be on older materials.

There is something new that I hope to explore this year.  That's the highest quality material available on the web.  This will NOT be a review of dog/cat videos and the like.  I believe that there is some real quality material out there that doesn't get the attention it deserves.  I want to be part of fixing that.  If I'm wrong then the Internet is really nothing more than a children's toy and we need to face that if true.

Over the next couple weeks I hope to take some time to fiddle with the site, re-arrange things, maybe remodel the place a bit.  For the moment I am unemployed and so I have the time to go a little deeper.  I also hope to do some writing that looks a little deeper that I can spread across at least the next couple months along with the usual suspects (Great movie, by the way, "The Usual Suspects".  It's the movie that made me say "Kevin Spacey?  Gotta keep my eyes open for this guy").  These posts will appear (assuming I find something worth including) as "The Best of the Web".  I'm kind of looking forward to exploring all this.  If you have a suggestion feel free to pass it along via the comments.

Friday, November 29, 2013

Christmas Mistake, Where Do You Go?, Unreal Reality



 "The View From the Phlipside" is a media commentary program airing on WRFA-LP, Jamestown NY.  It can be heard Monday through Friday just after 8 AM and 5 PM.  The following are scripts which may not exactly match the aired version of the program.  Mostly because the host may suddenly choose to add or subtract words at a moments notice.  WRFA-LP is not responsible for any such silliness or the opinions expressed.  You can listen to a live stream of WRFA or find a podcast of this program at wrfalp.com.  Copyright 2013 by Jay Phillippi.  All Rights Reserved.  You like what you see?  Drop me a line and we can talk.

Program scripts from week of November 24, 2013


My name is Jay Phillippi and I've spent my life in and around the media.  TV, radio, the movies and more.  I love them, and I hate them and I always have an opinion.  Call this the View from the Phlipside. 

Unreal Reality                                                                                                        

So let’s start off today with a question.  Pretty simple one really.  If you were signed to appear in a reality show, a reality show that was about the work you do, what would you expect?  Doesn’t really matter what you do, the show is about the line of work you’re in rather than about you.  So we’re talking “Deadliest Catch” (which is about crab fishing in the Bering Sea off the coast of Alaska) versus say “Keeping Up With The Kardashians” (which is about God only knows what).

Well, if you’re like a lot of the folks on these shows you might forget who, or rather what, is the center of the show.  I probably can’t blame them too much.  There you are on the screen, endlessly re-running, with an introduction that might even include your own little “nickname” (“The Hustler”, “The King”).  Oh and the fans!  You will have fans.  Fans who will argue about if you are the best part of the show or the worst.

It has to go to your head eventually.

Which explains a lot of the hubbub over at “Storage Wars”.  If you don’t know the show it’s about the folks who bid to clear out storage lockers after people default on their rentals.  I was a dedicated viewer for a while but the problem is that it all starts to look alike after a while.  The variety is in the personalities of the “cast”.  

So it was no doubt a huge surprise to a couple of the “stars” of the series when the network gave them the axe.  What choice did the producers have though?  You can’t fire the storage lockers.  So once things started to go stale you have only way to make changes.  You rotate out the cast members and replace them with someone who will bring some new schtick to the program.

Which brings us back to the original question?  What would you expect if it were you?  Just in case let me give you a model to follow.  Check Chumlee on the reality show “Pawn Stars”.  He commonly plays the “village idiot” on the show but reports are that he is stashing away the money he makes from doing personal appearances and has founded his own company to market various Chumlee novelties.  Chumlee seems to have figured out that fame in the reality TV game has a shelf life and is making the best of his time in the spotlight.

Turns out the “village idiot” may the smartest guy on TV.  Not the answer you expected, was it?

Where Do You Go?                                                                                                 

More and more of us spend more and more of our time online.  Whether it’s at a desktop computer, a laptop, tablet or on our smartphone we are spending more time keeping in touch with our world virtually.  That means different things for different people.  For some it’s various social media sites.  For others its some form of old school information sites like news, sports and weather.  Add in e-mail, text messages and more and you get the idea.  We spend a LOT of time in the digital universe.

So where do you spend most of your time?  Our browsers, Firefox, Chrome, Opera, Safari, Explorer, whatever, probably tell the story pretty clearly.  Most of us take the chance to make sure we can get to our favorite sites as easily as possible.  You do this by having your browser open to some of those sites in tabs and the rest can be placed on your Favorites bar.  So what would it say us, if we took a look at the stuff we want at easy access?

I offer mine as an example.  My primary browser is Chrome.  When I fire it up it gives my home page at igHome where I can scan news, sports and weather at a glance.  Next it is Facebook, then my blog feeds on Feedly and finally my to do list at Toodledo.  Pretty straight forward stuff.

Under that on the Favorites bar you’ll find links to both Blogger and WordPress for my two blogs (including the one for this program), then a link to MyDrive from Google because that’s where I do things like write these program scripts,  next comes Dropbox where I put the recorded versions of this program so WRFA can download them.  After that is my Netflix link (gotta keep my queue up to date), then MapMyRide to track my workouts (that one doesn’t get used as often as it should).  Finally you’ll my link to HootSuite, the application I use to control my social media posts, Google Play for when I need to have a little music in my life.  Last but not least is PhotoSig, a photo web site that I enjoy and don’t use nearly as much as I’d like.

So what would you learn about me by looking at my browser?  Well, about half of the items are related to the media, and about half of them are related to this program.  Yeah, that worries me a little.  I am both a media consumer and a content provider.

And I probably should work out more.

So where do you go?

Christmas Mistake                                                                                                                   

A couple times over the last few years I’ve taken some time to talk about my favorite Christmas movies.  Now because I’m allegedly very cranky on the subject of when Christmas media like music and movies should first start airing I will not start my annual viewing for another week.  However it’s not too early to start TALKING about the subject.

For this year I offer first some bad news and then some good news.  The bad news is that there are folks out there with no respect and no sense. These are the folks proposing to do a sequel of the Frank Capra classic “It’s A Wonderful Life”.  Worse than that it sounds like they are proposing a really bad sequel.  

My first thought when I read the story was that it was a fake.  But it was reported in “Variety” and several other respected sources seem to indicate that this bad idea is true.  The story says that they are proposing a script where Jimmy Stewart’s character “George Bailey”’s grandson, also named George Bailey, is visited by an angel to show him what the world would be like if Bailey redux had never been born.  That would be bad enough but the latter generation George is an unpleasant person apparently.

Then there’s the stunt casting.  Stunt casting is when you bring in a “name” actor to make an appearance in a movie or TV show.  Think, most of William Shatner’s career.  In this case the actor who played Zuzu Bailey in the original is to play the angel this time.

Feeling nauseated yet?  I could go on but it just makes me crazy.

The good news in all of this is that Paramount still owns the rights to “It’s A Wonderful Life” and all the characters.  They’ve issued a statement that they will block any attempt to make a sequel of any kind.  Let’s hope that they stick to that position.  At the same time it’s called the movie “business” for a reason.

Now if you really want a different take on“It’s A Wonderful Life” I can make a recommendation.  Check out a book called “The Last Temptation of Clarence Odbody” by John “Jughead” Pierson.  Warning, it’s a completely different take on the story.  But it’s pretty interesting.

And that’s all I ask for at Christmas.  Something interesting under the tree.

Call that the View From the Phlipside

Friday, September 6, 2013

The Coolness of Pod People; Here, Go Away; Rating the Internet



 "The View From the Phlipside" is a media commentary program airing on WRFA-LP, Jamestown NY.  It can be heard Monday through Friday just after 8 AM and 5 PM.  The following are scripts which may not exactly match the aired version of the program.  Mostly because the host may suddenly choose to add or subtract words at a moments notice.  WRFA-LP is not responsible for any such silliness or the opinions expressed.  You can listen to a live stream of WRFA or find a podcast of this program at wrfalp.com.  Copyright 2013 by Jay Phillippi.  All Rights Reserved.  You like what you see?  Drop me a line and we can talk.

Program scripts from week of September 2, 2013


My name is Jay Phillippi and I've spent my life in and around the media.  TV, radio, the movies and more.  I love them, and I hate them and I always have an opinion.  Call this the View from the Phlipside. 

Rating the Internet                                                                                           

I must admit to being utterly conflicted on this next subject.  On the one hand we are going to face an ever increasing avalanche of content without any means to sort it.  On the other hand the system that some people are suggesting as a model is one of the worst examples of fraud I’ve ever confronted.

Here’s the problem - with the growth of online content being available to us in our living rooms and family rooms through boxes like Apple TV or Roku or the newest entrant, Chromecast, we are now being confronted with all the content of the wild, wild web in a venue that used to be fairly safe.  Our living room or family room TV set.  I want you to think for just a minute about all the stuff that is out there.  All the stuff you may have seen yourself or just heard about.  The stupid stuff, the weird stuff, the stuff that you don’t even want to think about.  You know it’s out there, right?  Well with this new technology it’s now just as easily seen on the big screen in the main room of your house.  I just came across a mention of an adult video that was filmed using the new Google Glass technology.

Seems like some way of rating all that stuff might be useful before it all just comes spilling out into your living room.  A rating system, like the one we have for the movies, right?

Oh dear God I hope not.

The movie rating system is something that only works if you don’t think about it or ask questions.  Watch the movie “This Film is Not Yet Rated” and you’ll never look at the ratings the same way again.

Here’s the problem.  Who shall do the rating?  Based on what standards?  And how will we be able to use the rating system to control what is coming into our homes?  Right now you can simply block entire channels but there’s a goodly dose of cutting off your nose to spite your face in that approach.

Do we turn our choices over to an aggregator channel that guarantees us that they’ll only share videos of a certain kind, certain style, certain approach?  That doesn’t strike me as a particularly grown up way of dealing with the issue either.

The networks are controlled by the rules of the FCC.  The Internet is proud of it’s no rules stand.  I’m not so sure how that’s going to play when the stage for that performance is in America’s family rooms.



The Story That Got Away                                                                                      

There’s nothing quite like having a story just fall apart on you.  I had written and recorded a story about the latest round of the ongoing battle between the TV networks and the cable/satellite folks.  Sent it off and went to bed.  Woke up the next morning to hear that the dispute had been settled overnight making my story sound, well, lame.  It no longer made any sense whatsoever.

In the words of Pepe LePew - Le Sigh.

While the lucky folks in Dallas, L.A. and New York City now have their CBS stations back the underlying silliness of this battle still gets me.

The argument goes like this - the TV networks say that they put up all the money, take all the risks, in creating new content.  The cable/satellite people just use that product to make money for themselves.  As the content provider the networks want a bigger piece of the pie.  Since no business person WANTS to give away more of the money they make the cable folk resist.

What got me this time was that Time Warner (the cable company in this episode) was not only telling their customers to watch TV on something other than cable they were giving those customers the technology to do it.  They were giving away digital antennas.  That’s right, a pay TV service is giving you the means to watch TV for free.  What was really fun was that this left CBS in the position of explaining to their affiliates, the local TV stations, why this was a bad thing.  Of course it’s NOT really a bad thing if you’re the local station.  It’s really just all confusing and stupid posturing that ends up with the viewers getting the short end of the stick.
I don’t think any of this actually works to the benefit of the networks or the service providers.  Annoying your consumers and making them think about getting their TV in some other way is just a bad plan in the long run.  The big business types may not yet realize that they’re battling over the bones of a dying system.  The battle is just speeding up the death spiral.

So did the two combatants come to a meeting of the minds on the issues at hand?  Almost surely not.  The reality is that the NFL season is about to begin and the cable folk caved rather than miss out on the audience and advertising dollars associated with pro football.

The story kind of came apart on them as well.


The Coolness of Pod People                                                                                                      

So imagine my immense surprise to discover that I had suddenly become one of the cool kids.  This, I am sure you will be stunned to discover, virtually never happens.  My last two cars were built by a company that no longer exists.  I’m not a technology early adopter and I have no interest in what the latest fad is except as the subject for one of these commentaries.

And yet here I am, among the growing audience for podcasts.  That’s right, I said growing.  The folks at Apple note that the number of downloads of what is now an old school technology has been increasing over the last couple years.  About 10% of us over the age of 12 listened to a podcast in  2006.  Last year that number had grown to 26%.  This is a technology that folks like the New York Times had abandoned because they didn’t see it making financial sense.

So why are people turning to podcasts?  Well let me tell you why I have.  My job involves a fair amount of long distance driving all over western New York.  I love radio but too often I end up hearing the same thing over and over again.  Even NPR repeats stories during the day.  And I prefer a slightly higher IQ than most talk radio can provide.  So what do I do?

Books on disc are fine but you need to invest some long hours to those.  I need something to cover the hour and a half to two hours that my drives usually involve.  Plus with podcasts I can find programs that cover just about any of my rather diverse interests.

My current list of subscriptions include “This Week in Technology”, the literary podcasts from “The Moth”, NPR’s “Wait, Wait Don’t Tell Me” plus several history podcasts, creativity podcasts and TED talks.

One of the big adjustments that the media has to make in moving away from a broadcast mentality to a narrowcasting or niche model.  Podcasting is the ultimate in targeted audience because we chose what’s on our media.  And we’re investing more time in those programs. Not so curiously advertisers have figured this out and are moving more dollars into that marketplace.

So I’m either old school and the new cutting edge.  I’m not sure I care either way.  I’m just looking forward to many more hours of smart, funny, interesting listening on the road.

And THAT’S cool.

Call that the View From the Phlipside

Friday, August 9, 2013

Life On the Farm, Stupider and Hot New Toy



 "The View From the Phlipside" is a media commentary program airing on WRFA-LP, Jamestown NY.  It can be heard Tuesday through Friday just after 8 AM and 5 PM.  The following are scripts which may not exactly match the aired version of the program.  Mostly because the host may suddenly choose to add or subtract words at a moments notice.  WRFA-LP is not responsible for any such silliness or the opinions expressed.  You can listen to a live stream of WRFA or find a podcast of this program at wrfalp.com.  Copyright 2013 by Jay Phillippi.  All Rights Reserved.  You like what you see?  Drop me a line and we can talk.



Program scripts from week of August 5, 2013


My name is Jay Phillippi and I've spent my life in and around the media.  TV, radio, the movies and more.  I love them, and I hate them and I always have an opinion.  Call this the View from the Phlipside. 

Hot New Toy                                                                                                        

There has been a “Holy Grail” out there for a lot of technology companies for a while now. It’s the ability to hook up the computer to the TV and make it all work together. Apple TV has tried with limited success, Google TV has had only limited success as well. The technology isn’t all that tough but getting the user experience down to something simple and intuitive seems to be the hang up. If you’re going to ask the consumer to put yet another box on top of the TV (and in all likelihood ask them to do the wiring themselves) consumers have been underwhelmed. As much as we complain about the cable guy or the satellite company guy coming in to hook up the box it’s done and it works. 
And that means a lot in this market.
So when Google launched their new Chromecast device last month people sat up and took notice. Because it was plug in simple.
Let’s deal with one thing right off the bat. The device that you plug into the HDMI slot on your TV is called a “dongle”. Get your snickering over with now because that’s a term that’s been around for a long time. Give it a year and it won’t sound weird anymore. Dongle. OK? Good.
The great thing is that you just plug it in, very much like a USB jump drive. There’s not wiring, there’s not even a remote control. You connect and control Chromecast through your laptop, tablet or smartphone. Basically you can now “cast” or send whatever you watch on those devices, Youtube, Netflix, et cetera, to the Chromecast dongle and it plays on your TV. Simple. And even better, cheap. The Chromecast device is selling for $35.
As with any brand new device it has some bugs and bumps. It already supports Youtube, Netflix streaming and Google Play. But folks are lining up to help make the experience even better. Hulu, HBO Go and Pandora are all in talks with Google. Behind them come folks like AOL, Redbox Instant by Verizon, Vevo and Vimeo. 
After trying far more complicated solutions it looks like Google may have finally found the “Holy Grail”. The even better news is that Google’s competitors won’t be far behind.
The days of truly bringing all your media together in one place just might be just around the corner.


Stupider?                                                                                                           

I must confess that I seem to be developing a new habit. I’m not sure at the moment if it’s a good one or a bad one. I am becoming a serious multiple screen multi-tasker. When I’m watching TV I often, not always but often, have my laptop with me. I will sometimes have the TV on and muted while I’m working on the computer (like writing scripts for this program). I like to have IMDB open when I’m watching a movie or TV show so I can check on a detail or who an actor is. I may have a Pirates or Steelers or Bills game when I’m writing. Usually it’s not problem (although interrupting Mrs. Phlipside’s movie viewing to bombard her with movie trivia is not advised) but there are times when I just feel myself zoning out.
I have become a little more concerned when I saw a new study about two things. First, I discover I am not alone. More of us than ever before are multi-tasking with technology. This year alone time watching media will rise by 13 minutes on average leaving us just a few minutes shy of 12 hours of media per person.
That’s a little intimidating all by itself. Then I came across a study out of South Korea. The Koreans are the most digitally connected country in the world. What is being seen is a spike in what they are calling digital dementia. That’s when folks who spend a lot of time viewing media show the same kinds of memory loss more commonly associated with head injury or psychiatric illness.
Ummmm, excuse me while I lean over and turn off the TV.
Ok. Now let’s take a step back. The study was looking especially at the effect on children and teens. The problem is that it doesn’t seem to take into account normal responses in the teen aged years. Teens do tend to become obsessed with ideas at that age. Take a look at Beatlemania or Sinatra’s bobby soxers and tell me that doesn’t look like mental illness. Plus remembering phone numbers (which is one of the tests used) has changed because of our access to smartphones. My wife has had the same cell phone number for years. I have no idea what it is. It’s programmed into my phone so I don’t worry about it.
Do we all spend more time with media that we probably should? 12 hours a day? Yeah, that’s an easy one. Seems like the cure for this is easy. Step away from the technology and go watch a sunset. Or talk with your family.
It’s a win-win situation.


Life On The Farm                                                                                                                      

Consider today’s program a public service.
I’m sure you’re familiar with those annoying Facebook posts that say things like “Name a city whose name doesn’t have an “R” in it. It’s harder than you think!” (You mean like Jamestown, Buffalo, Cleveland, Chicago?) or the “Like if you hate cancer!” ones. You’ve seen them. The ones with tens of thousands or hundreds of thousands of likes.
Most people fall into two categories. Those that click on those things and those that find them just too annoying to bother. I want to create a much larger third group. Those who know what’s going on.
It’s called “like farming”. And we're the farm animals.  The goal is to get a whole lot of people to connect with your page then sell it to an advertiser who now has a database to exploit. And that’s not the only thing they do. A lot of these involve photos taken from websites without permission or attribution, giving them a fake name and backstory, to generate likes. It’s a sham from start to finish.
Is this an end of the world kind of problem? Honestly, no. We are giving away our contact info right and left on the Internet most days. To be honest most of us don’t even realize how much of our info is out there and how freely we’ve granted the business community the opportunity to make use of it.
But there just seems to be something more insidious about this. There is something disturbing at a fundamental level about exploiting people’s decency for profit without their knowledge. The good news is that it’s a lot easier to fix than some of the problems with privacy issues on the World Wide Web.
Just stop doing it.
The reality is that you’re not accomplishing anything other than handing the keys to your digital life to someone you don’t know and don’t want to know. Oh there is one other thing you’re doing. You are annoying the daylights out of most of your friends.
I’m willing to stipulate that my friends are basically decent folks who hate cancer, love kittens and puppies and support our troops.
I’m hoping they’re smart enough not to continue to let themselves be “farm” animals.


Call that the View From the Phlipside

Friday, March 22, 2013

RIP Reader, ESPN and Crowdsourced Creation



 "The View From the Phlipside" is a media commentary program airing on WRFA-LP, Jamestown NY.  It can be heard Tuesday through Friday just after 8 AM and 5 PM.  The following are scripts which may not exactly match the aired version of the program.  Mostly because the host may suddenly choose to add or subtract words at a moments notice.  WRFA-LP is not responsible for any such silliness or the opinions expressed.  You can listen to a live stream of WRFA or find a podcast of this program at wrfalp.com.  Copyright 2013 by Jay Phillippi.  All Rights Reserved.  You like what you see?  Drop me a line and we can talk.

Program scripts from week of March 18, 2013



My name is Jay Phillippi and I've spent my life in and around the media.  TV, radio, the movies and more.  I love them, and I hate them and I always have an opinion.  Call this the View from the Phlipside. 

Crowdsourced Creation                                                                                                        


One of the coolest things that the Internet allows us to do is called crowdsourcing.  If you’re not familiar with the term it is a way of getting services provided or tasks accomplished by calling on a large group of people.  The idea is an old one really.  It’s called “Many hands make light work”.  Crowdsourcing has been used by all kinds of groups to do all kinds of things.

Here are just a few examples - movies have been made, translations done, the Department of Defense has done some research using crowdsourcing, satellite photo review searching for lost people, creating texts that are accessible to the visually impaired, creating maps, creating an encyclopedia, environmental monitoring.  Heck you can even fund a new album for your band by crowdsourcing the finances!

But of all those projects (and several of them are really cool) I think THE coolest one was the project that crowdsourced the design of a sports car.  A company called Local Motors wanted to see if they could use the Internet community to design a race car more efficiently and less expensively than the old school way.  What they got took only 18 months and three million dollars to develop the Rally Fighter, an eight cylinder, 430 horsepower racing machine.  Cost?  $99,900.  There is one other small catch.  You have to build the car yourself.  Included in the price is a six day stay at the factory, all the instructions you can use (including wikis and videos) plus the assistance of the Local Motors expert staff.  Pretty amazing really.

The old school way requires a large design team and layers of corporate bureaucracy.  Sometimes that creates great cars.  Most of the time it just generates pretty good ones.  And Local Motors isn’t done.  They have a design process underway for a military vehicle for the folks at DARPA, the Pentagon’s research arm (and ironically the origin of the World Wide Web) plus they have community challenges out there for the creation of a new pizza delivery vehicle for Domino’s (which explains part of their current ad campaign) and the best design for a driving shoe as requested by Nike.

Imagine hopping into your crowdsource designed car, opening your crowdsource created map to plan your trip while you listen to a crowdsource financed album from your favorite band.

The mind boggles.


The March of Time                                                                                                       

If there is one entity in the TV world that stands pretty much unchallenged right now it’s the network that has adopted the title of “World Wide Leader in Sports”, ESPN.  Yes there are other sports networks out there, most of them focused on specific sport, a few of them trying to be more all encompassing but the reality is that second place in this particular race is so distant that first place can barely be glimpsed.

Now I’m a big sports fan and I watch more than my share of ESPN.  At the same time I’ve recently become more and more annoyed with the sports network.  Maybe it’s just because it’s my least favorite sports month of the year.  March.  When most of the sporting media world in the U.S. seem to forget that there’s anything other than basketball going on right now.  Between the avalanche known as March Madness and ESPN’s over emphasis on the NBA trying to find any other sports on the “World Leader” can be problematic.

And yes I said over emphasis on the NBA.  Now I know that this will bring on the howls of the hoops fandom world.  They would have you believe that pro hoops is on the verge of becoming the second most popular team sport in America behind only the NFL.  Everybody loves the NBA.  What would you add in?  Football is off season, Baseball is only spring training and it’s not like the NHL is a major sport.  But there’s a problem with that argument.

It’s the assumption that the NBA is more popular than it really is.  Take a look at the attendance statistics for the 2011-12 seasons.  Baseball and football are way out in first and second place.  It’s baseball for overall attendance and football for per game attendance.  But when you take a look at the hockey versus basketball numbers it’s very interesting.  Because the NHL actually draws a little better.  

So why the imbalance in coverage on ESPN?  That’s easy.  They have a basketball contract but no hockey contract.  That may be the opening some new competition needs.  And both NBCSports and the deep pockets of Rupert Murdoch and FoxSport Network are coming.  FoxSports is quite upfront that they are gunning for ESPN.
Maybe we’ll end up with just another “World Wide Leader in Sports We Have Contracts With” but at the moment I think I’d take that happily.

Next On Tonight

It has become something of a tradition here on The View From the Phlipside to note the passing of folks that I believe deserve a final salute but who may not get it.  Today we’ll alter that just a bit by offering a salute to a lesser known but sorely to be missed computer application.  Farewell to Google Reader.

Google Reader is (for a few weeks more) an RSS aggregator.  RSS stands for Really Simple Syndication.  It’s an old online application but a potentially useful one.  Think of it as a simple subscription system that allows you to sign up to follow your favorite web sites.  An aggregator is the application that handles all those subscriptions.  

Now there are three groups of people on the subject of Google pulling the plug on Reader July 1.  People like me for whom Reader is a part of our daily lives.  We are not happy.  There are people who think, for various reasons, that Reader needs to die.  And then there’s everybody else.  Who mostly don’t care.

Here’s the reality - RSS has been around for a long time but not a lot of people use it.  And the number has been falling especially the last couple years.  So there is a reasonable argument for Google’s decision.

What’s really stood out for me has been some of the arguments made by the “Reader should die” camp.  This is includes Dave Winer who is actually one of the guys who helped create RSS.  What jumped out at me was this quote “Next time, please pay a fair price for the services you depend on.”

And that’s the rub isn’t it?  We’ve become accustomed to getting cool stuff and services on the Internet for free.  The problem is that free is a tough business model to make work.

But here’s the challenge I’d offer in return.  When cable took on “free TV” (which wasn’t really free of course but a different topic for a different day) conventional wisdom said it couldn’t be done.  So why is pay TV virtually universal these days?  Because they offered something over the air TV couldn’t.

Just dumping free services doesn’t guarantee that we’ll move to fee based services unless there’s an improvement in our experience.  In the end you can take away our Reader but you can’t make us pay.


Call that the View From the Phlipside

Friday, January 25, 2013

The Reality of Virtual Relationships, RIP Dear Abby, Cyber-bullying





 "The View From the Phlipside" is a media commentary program airing on WRFA-LP, Jamestown NY.  It can be heard Tuesday through Friday just after 8 AM and 5 PM.  The following are scripts which may not exactly match the aired version of the program.  Mostly because the host may suddenly choose to add or subtract words at a moments notice.  WRFA-LP is not responsible for any such silliness or the opinions expressed.  You can listen to a live stream of WRFA or find a podcast of this program at wrfalp.com.  Copyright 2012 by Jay Phillippi.  All Rights Reserved.  You like what you see?  Drop me a line and we can talk.

Program scripts from week of January 21, 2013



My name is Jay Phillippi and I've spent my life in and around the media.  TV, radio, the movies and more.  I love them, and I hate them and I always have an opinion.  Call this the View from the Phlipside. 

RIP Dear Abby                                                                                                         

Most of us went most of our lives without knowing her real name.  We knew her sister was in the exact same line of work.  In fact in their prime the two sisters were their only mutual competition.  Last week we lost a true American icon with the death of Pauline Phillips.  The world knew her better as Dear Abby.

A lot of people are called icons but I’m not sure all of them deserve it.  A quick check of my dictionary tells me that an icon is “A person or thing regarded as a representative symbol of something”.  Dear Abby is iconic for her representation of middle American common sense.  Her advice was honest but tempered by kindness.  Women’s advice columns before Dear Abby tended to be formulaic and safe.  There were some subjects that were not to be discussed.  Dear Abby took on them all.


Behind the pen name of Abigail Van Buren was Pauline Esther Friedman (her twin sister who became Ann Landers was Esther Pauline Friedman) born to a family of Russian Jewish immigrants who settled in Iowa and ran movie theaters.  Abby (let’s stick to that name since it’s the one most of us know here by) got started writing advice columns in San Francisco with typical blunt honesty.  She got in touch with the editor of the San Francisco Chronicle and told him she could write better than their regular columnist.  He gave her a handful of letters and a week to write up her replies.  She handed them back 90 minutes later and he hired her.  The column would go into syndication and become the most widely syndicated newspaper column in the world.

Dear Abby didn’t become an icon because she was famous.  She became an icon because she represented an awful lot of what is best and unique about Middle America.  A willingness to take on any subject, to have an opinion but to leave the mean spiritedness aside.  We could use more Dear Abby today I think.

Pauline Phillips, the original Dear Abby, was 94 years old.


Cyber-bullying                                                                                                        

If you work with teenagers as I do in my real life it is one of the top three topics of conversation these days.  If you’re a parent you probably hear about it a lot as well.  It’s called cyber-bullying, emotional and verbal abuse on the internet.  Because our kids spend so much time online we’ve begun to wonder just how emotionally dangerous it may be.  There’s no doubt that for a young person in the wrong emotional place at the wrong time it can be devastating.  None of us want to see the young people we care about being abused.  To that end a variety of states have passed laws against cyber-bullying.

The real problem is defining just what we’re talking about.  Is just being mean the same as being a bully?  I think most of us would say no to that.  Kids are in the process of working out who they are and how they interact with others.  That takes them to some mean places at times.  Virtually all of us have been mean to someone else at some point in our lives.  It doesn’t make us terrible people.

In pursuit of defining what cyber-bullying may be the folks at the Pew Research Center did a nationwide survey of teenagers and asked them about their experience online.  The results can help us parse this complex issue.

First people may be surprised by the overall positive experience most teens say they have.  While 88% say they’ve seen someone being “mean or cruel”, two thirds of those surveyed said that people are mostly kind online.  20% said they’ve been bullied (although the largest percentage note that it was in person rather than online) and 20% have admitted that they have joined in on cruelty to others.

What’s interesting to me is that most of the teens that Pew spoke with said they just ignore the negativity when it invades their lives.  They’re pretty good at using the privacy controls offered them to limit who can see their posts on places like Facebook and Twitter as well.  They also turn to friends and sometimes parents when they need support.

So in the end the Pew research gives a little better handle on the issue.  Cyber-bullying does exist, it can be harmful.  Our best reaction?  To continue to help our kids defend themselves by giving them the tools they need in life and on the web.



On the Reality of Virtual Relationships

Last week I was introduced to a concept called Catfishing.  If you missed it to “catfish” is to create a fake online persona for the purposes of a hoax, a joke or to generally deceive someone.  This is different than having an online persona for your own personal use.  Where it came up is with the story of Manti T’eo the senior linebacker at Notre Dame.  It appears that he believed that he had developed a relationship with a young woman online.  Turns out she was a catfish created by a young man who may done this to several other people as well.

I’m not going to get into the “what did he know and when did he know it” aspect of this discussion.  That will come out slowly over the next month or so as more of the principal characters come forward.  I want to talk about a response I heard several times from commentators about one media aspect of the story.

Several commentators have had great fun with the idea that you can’t have a “real” relationship just via the internet or phone.  That it’s not possible to have a relationship with a person you’ve never met in person.

I think those commentators are showing their age.

Let’s remember that T’eo is not quite 22 years old.  He grew up on the Internet.  Young people are much more comfortable, in fact often too comfortable, sharing large portions of their lives and thoughts on line.  Just the way you do with friends.  They’ve had long conversations with people who live tens, hundreds and thousands of miles away from them.  This is a normal and routine part of their social lives.  So why wouldn’t they make friends there?

And who is to say that romantic feelings couldn’t bloom as well?  Well lots of grumpy middle aged men for whom the Internet is a tool rather than an integral part of their lives have been trying to make that exact point.  There’s a whole new generation that says they’re wrong.

Virtual communications can miss a lot of nuance and can make this kind of hoax all too easy.  But before we simply mark this young man off as a fool for believing in a serious online relationship maybe we need to examine our preconceptions about the virtual world.



Call that the View From the Phlipside

Friday, January 4, 2013

Rock Can Kill You, College Bowl Games and The Great Experiment Fails



 "The View From the Phlipside" is a media commentary program airing on WRFA-LP, Jamestown NY.  It can be heard Tuesday through Friday just after 8 AM and 5 PM.  The following are scripts which may not exactly match the aired version of the program.  Mostly because the host may suddenly choose to add or subtract words at a moments notice.  WRFA-LP is not responsible for any such silliness or the opinions expressed.  You can listen to a live stream of WRFA or find a podcast of this program at wrfalp.com.  Copyright 2012 by Jay Phillippi.  All Rights Reserved.  You like what you see?  Drop me a line and we can talk.

Program scripts from week of December 31, 2012



My name is Jay Phillippi and I've spent my life in and around the media.  TV, radio, the movies and more.  I love them, and I hate them and I always have an opinion.  Call this the View from the Phlipside. 

The Great Experiment Fails                                                                                   

I’m not sure there’s another aspect of our relationship with media that continues to struggle more in the transition to the digital age than how we get our news.  Once the printing press started making print materials easier to produce something very much like our modern newspapers came into being.  For centuries this was the primary way, beyond word of mouth, that most people found out about what was happening in the larger world.  As the years went by the newspaper got bigger and offered more and more news.  Not just the local but the national and the international.  Feature stories, sports stories and my personal favorite - the funnies.  I remember waiting till my Dad got home from work because he always brought home the afternoon paper.  I could lay it out on the living room floor and read about all kinds of things.

I’ve talked before about the challenges facing newspapers, magazines, radio and TV news before.  Studies I’ve seen say that there is still a desire for that kind of information.  At the same time people are expecting a different approach that makes use of the technology that has become a larger and larger part of our lives.  Finding the way forward through all those questions has been a challenge.

You had to wonder if Rupert Murdoch had dealt himself the winning hand in February of 2011 when he launched “The Daily”.  The Daily was intended to be the newspaper of the future.  In its initial form it was for the iPad only and was designed to make use of the multi-media abilities of the world’s first successful tablet computer.  Murdoch’s News Corporation would seem to have been just the kind of organization to make it work.  Long history in the journalism field (admittedly not all of it of the highest calibre) and the deep pockets to fund it till it got rolling.  Turns out that became the problem.  It never got rolling.  Which is why they pulled the plug on The Daily December 15.

So the journey will continue into the new year.  How do we want our news delivered?  What business model can be found to make it work and show a profit?

As we watch the launch of a new leadership right here at our hometown newspaper we’ll have to see if there’s some bright business person out there with the idea to launch the next generation of the news.


College Bowl Games                                                                                                          

Once upon a time, a very long time ago, college bowl season was something special.  The college bowl games were the icing on the cake, the tinsel on the Christmas tree, the great way to kick off the New Year by watching the kickoffs of some of the best college football teams in the land.  Those days are dead, dead as a doornail, dead as Marley’s ghost.  What we have in its place is just about as welcome as a visit from Scrooge’s late partner as well.

As is my custom let me be clear - I am not a great college football fan.  I didn’t attend a college with a great football tradition.  I watch one game a year - the Army/Navy game.  Attending that game in person is on my bucket list.  Outside of that I have no use for the college game.  But back in the day I watched a great many of those bowl games.  They were an event back in the day.

Not so much today.

Here’s a quiz for you.  How many bowl games are scheduled for the 2012-13 football bowl season?  10? 20?  Not there yet.  25.  Nope.  30.  Nope.  35 bowl games between December 15 and the so called National Championship on January 7.  Among them you will find such luminaries as the Beef O’Brady bowl, the Kraft Fight Hunger bowl, the Famous Idaho Potato bowl, the Military bowl not to be confused with the Bell Helicopter Armed Forces bowl, the Buffalo Wild Wings bowl, the Belk bowl, the Franklin American Mortgage Music City bowl and the San Diego County Credit Union Poinsettia bowl.  But all of this leads up to the big game, the National Championship, right?  So you’d expect the bowls to slowly crescendo right?  So explain to me why the last bowl game before the big one is the GoDaddy.com bowl featuring Arkansas State against Kent State.  Other than folks with bets on the game and alumni who watches these games?  I have a friend who is a huge college football fan.  The rule is don’t call on Saturday during football season.  You can visit as long as you sit down and watch the game.  He probably watches all them too.  I just can’t imagine why.

Once upon a time these games were special.

Today let’s just call them all the Irrelevant Football Cash Bowls and move on.


Rock Can Kill You

The New Year is always a time for me to sit back and re-assess my life.  Time to take a look at the goals I want to set for myself.  Plus a time to look at the things I’ve managed to tick off my Bucket List along the way.  This past year for example I finally managed to go to Europe for the first time.  I hope it won’t be the last but I can at least say I’ve done it.

Along the way there are also some things that you just have to admit you’re not ever going to do.  I am never going to play second base for the Pittsburgh Pirates.  Or any other professional baseball team but my goal was always the Pirates.  For a lot of us on that dream list included singing or playing with a rock band.  The good news is that as Baby Boomer rockers continue to play well into their geezerhood there may still be hope for me on this one.  A recent academic study out of the United Kingdom may make me re-consider however.

The study was done by the British Health Department and the folks at Liverpool John Moores University.  They studied rock stars from Elvis Presley to the Arctic Monkeys (I looked them up, current English indie rock group).  What they discovered is not surprising and yet a little daunting all at the same time.

Over fourteen hundred stars from rock, punk, pop, R&B, rap, electronica and New Age who worked between 1956 and 2006.  Of that number 137 or just over 9% have died which is a higher percentage of the overall age demographic.  That’s right being a rock star is bad for your health.  Curiously North American music stars seem to live longer than their English cousins, 45.2 years versus 39.6.

Speaking of ages the study debunks the popular 27 year old myth.  While Joplin, Hendricks, Morrison, Cobain and Winehouse all died at that age they are the exception rather than the rule.

The other thing the study saw was that solo acts tend to die younger than members of groups.  It could be that having some support from your band mates make a difference.

Guess it’s true, you can get by, with a little help from your friends.


Call that the View From the Phlipside