Showing posts with label e-book. Show all posts
Showing posts with label e-book. Show all posts

Friday, January 24, 2014

Net Neutrality, Adult Monster and RIP Russell Johnson



 "The View From the Phlipside" is a media commentary program airing on WRFA-LP, Jamestown NY.  It can be heard Monday through Friday just after 8 AM and 5 PM.  The following are scripts which may not exactly match the aired version of the program.  Mostly because the host may suddenly choose to add or subtract words at a moments notice.  WRFA-LP is not responsible for any such silliness or the opinions expressed.  You can listen to a live stream of WRFA or find a podcast of this program at wrfalp.com.  Copyright 2013 by Jay Phillippi.  All Rights Reserved.  You like what you see?  Drop me a line and we can talk.

Program scripts from week of January 20, 2014


My name is Jay Phillippi and I've spent my life in and around the media.  TV, radio, the movies and more.  I love them, and I hate them and I always have an opinion.  Call this the View from the Phlipside. 

RIP Russell Johnson                                                                                            

For an actor there’s always the question of whether you really want a role that will stay with you for the rest of your career.  That Captain Kirk or Doctor Who role that will make your name familiar to virtually everyone but might just limit your future roles because they will always see as THAT character.

If you’re leading actor it can probably be survived.  I mean Bill Shatner has had several more big time character since the original Star Trek went off the air.  If you’re a character actor it can be more of a problem.  Your bread and butter is disappearing into supporting roles and it can be tough if everyone says “Wait, it’s so and so!”

So when I saw that Russell Johnson had passed away last week I wondered how he’d done after his iconic role.  Johnson played the Professor on the ‘60s classic TV show “Gilligan’s Island” (Do you know the character’s real name?  I had to look it up.  Roy Hinkley).  A quick check showed me that Johnson had a solid career before becoming a castaway and an equally solid one after.

Johnson was born in northeastern Pennsylvania, served in World War II as a B-24 crew member and was awarded a variety of medals including the Purple Heart.  By 1952 he had begun his Hollywood career and it was a career where he worked with a lot of interesting people including Audie Murphy, George Raft, Ronald Reagan and Robert Redford.  He also appeared in a lot of popular TV shows through the years including “The Twilight Zone”, “Lassie”, “Lou Grant”, “Dallas”, “McGyver”, “Dynasty” and “Alf” among many, many others.

There was always a big question surrounding his best known character.  If the Professor could make almost anything out of bamboo and coconuts why couldn’t he fix the boat and get them off the island?  Johnson was asked that question for years.  His answer was simple.  Boat building was not among the Professor’s skills.

With Johnson’s death only two members of the original cast still survive.  Curiously they are the two at the center of the longest running discussion concerning the show - Ginger or Mary Ann?

While I’m a Mary Ann guy all the way I can’t tell you who was the Professor’s favorite.

Russell Johnson was 89 years old.


Adult Monster                                                                                                    

Today’s show comes with a little bit of a warning upfront.  I will be extremely discreet but it’s still a topic you probably won’t want to have to explain to small children.  In fact I am relying on the intelligence of the WRFA listenership to fill in a LOT in the set up of this story.  Because quite simply, this story is weird.

We are discussing a certain genre of adult literature normally referred to by a four letter word that begins with the letter “P”.  Now maybe you’re thinking I’m being overly cautious.  This kind of material has even gone mainstream through titles like “50 Shades of Gray”.  But that’s pretty tame compared to the topic at hand.  Take the “P word” and put the word “monster” in front of it.  As in it involves Bigfoot or Pterodactyls.

The bad news is I’m not kidding.  The good news is we’re going to talk about something else from now on.

The upside of the brave new digital publishing world is that it’s allowing many more authors to get their work before an audience and, hopefully, make some money.  Titles that won’t generate enough sales to interest a major publisher can actually be quite successful at the self-published level because so much of even a modest sales price goes to profit.  The overhead can be virtually zero.

Of course the artistic value of a lot of these books can be virtually zero as well.  But that’s fine, there’s very little money on the line for anyone.

The amazing thing about the books in question here is that they’re actually selling pretty well.  Well enough that one author brings in anywhere from six thousand to thirty thousand dollars a month in sales.  Enough that she has funded her daughter’s college education with the proceeds.  At least she was until folks like Amazon were shocked, shocked do you hear to discover they were selling this sort of thing.  They began pulling the books from the listings claiming they somehow violated their extremely vague content guidelines.

You couldn’t pay me to read these books.  But I think the folks at the major online outlets that handle self published books are kidding themselves if they think this is going to go away. 

They may want to call this kind of publishing a monster.  But it’s a monster they’ve helped to create.

Net Neutrality                                                                                                                           

You may have recently heard that the Internet as we have come to know and love it is coming to an end.  All delivered in properly apocalyptic prose certain Chicken Littles are declaring that the sky is falling.

The truth is somewhat more complicated than that.  The discussion revolves around a concept called “Net Neutrality” and it was the subject of a court decision a week or so ago.

First, let’s define “net neutrality” in case you’re not clear on the concept.  It means that everybody gets treated the same on the World Wide Web.  So you, the consumer, can access my blog just the same as you access your streaming videos on Netflix.  Your Internet Service Provider (ISP) can’t charge you more to visit certain sites over other sites.  It’s all “neutral”.

The problem comes up that treating all web sites equally isn’t really fair because, well, they’re not all equal.  My blog has a small but dedicated readership.  At peak hours Netflix accounts for 32% of total traffic according to some studies.  Believe it or not there are limitations to how much traffic the Internet can bear.  So the ISPs would like the big bandwidth users, like Netflix, to pay a little more.

A lot of the furor has to do with how much more and who would pay it.

But that’s not the only issue.  If net neutrality goes bye bye it actually opens up all kinds of potential issues that would make life on the Internet less pleasant.  We’ve seen the kind of stupid games that get played between cable channels and the service providers.  Channels being blacked out and endless finger pointing.  Well without net neutrality the same thing could happen with services on the Internet.  Suddenly there’s some kind of argument and service to those sites suddenly slooooooows down.

In reality the final word is a long way from being spoken on this subject.  The FCC can still appeal the current court decision including taking it eventually to the Supreme Court.  Or they could re-write the regulations to suit the current ruling or get around the current ruling.  Or Congress could decide to change the law.

But what I can say without any great fear of contradiction is that stories of the Internet’s demise are decidedly premature.


Call that the View From the Phlipside

Wednesday, October 2, 2013

Book Review - Be The Monkey

Be The Monkey - Ebooks and Self-Publishing  - A Conversation Between Authors Barry Eisler and Joe Konrath

This is a different kind of book about the new different kind of books.  Eisler and Konrath are successful authors who are making money (even serious money) by publishing digitally.  The book is the record of a live Google Docs conversation between them back in 2011.  Just shortly before the conversation Eisler turned down a two book, $500,000 contract with St. Martin's Press because he believed he would be better served to publish those books himself.

The conversation takes your through the entire argument for self publishing ebooks - creative control, financial and longevity.  You should be warned - this are two long time friends and they don't edit themselves in this forum.  Some of the stuff in here is a little raw (like the subject of the title.  I'm still afraid to follow the link provided) but all of it is compelling.

I was traveling recently and turned to this book because nothing else in my Nook grabbed me.  I thought I'd while away long hours in airports and planes.  What I got was a book that I could not set down.  As a hopeful author and long time student of new media these two deconstructed several long held beliefs and put a perfectly rational replacement in each place.

This isn't a book that is going to interest everyone.  In fact you have to be into the intricacies of book publishing or an author to find this book attractive at first blush.  But I would recommend that anyone interested in the future of books read this short (141 pages) but powerful book.

Rating - **** Recommended

Saturday, September 21, 2013

The Cyrus Thing, What Makes Great TV? and New Reading Models



 "The View From the Phlipside" is a media commentary program airing on WRFA-LP, Jamestown NY.  It can be heard Monday through Friday just after 8 AM and 5 PM.  The following are scripts which may not exactly match the aired version of the program.  Mostly because the host may suddenly choose to add or subtract words at a moments notice.  WRFA-LP is not responsible for any such silliness or the opinions expressed.  You can listen to a live stream of WRFA or find a podcast of this program at wrfalp.com.  Copyright 2013 by Jay Phillippi.  All Rights Reserved.  You like what you see?  Drop me a line and we can talk.

Program scripts from week of September 15, 2013


My name is Jay Phillippi and I've spent my life in and around the media.  TV, radio, the movies and more.  I love them, and I hate them and I always have an opinion.  Call this the View from the Phlipside. 

New Reading Models                                                                                          

I have been a fair bit of traveling recently and that means my beloved Nook Color is getting a workout.  One of the advantages of an e-book reader is that I can carry around not only things I really want to read but also things that I think I probably will be interested in.  One of those is a very ebook kind of book called “Ebooks and Self Publishing - A Conversation Between Authors Barry Eisler and Joe Konrath”.  It’s actually the transcript of a live Google Docs discussion and for those of us interested in these kinds of things it is fascinating.  So imagine my joy when I got home and sat down to look for topics to find two ebook related stories waiting for me!

There are books that I would love to have on the Nook.  Roger Zelazny’s “Chronicles of Amber”, Isaac Asimov’s “Foundation” trilogy, Harper Lee’s “To Kill A Mockingbird”.  Books that I love to reread every couple years.  The problem is that building a new digital library is a huge expense for books I already own.  Well the folks at Amazon are looking at solving that problem.  Their newly announced Kindle Matchbooks program allows you to buy Kindle versions of paper books that you have purchased from Amazon.  There are two really cool things about this.  First it will cover any book you’ve purchased at Amazon going back to 1995 (which just happens to be the year they were founded).  The other thing is price.  Most of the ebooks will be priced between 99 cents and 2.99, some may even be free.  Curiously this is exactly the price range that the two guys in that book I read feel is the sweet spot for ebook sales.  It’s an interesting concept that actually makes a logical connection between the old and the new.  The first thought that came to mind was the video combo packs that combine Blu-rays, DVDs and, wait for it, digital versions.
The other story I think has great potential for an old line media.  The folks at Barnes and Noble have entered into a deal with UWire to be able to offer college newspapers on Nooks.  What I really like is that it gets an audience that has effectively given up on newspapers to start thinking about newspapers on their readers.  If you can get the future leaders of the nation in the habit of turning to their e-readers to get the daily news it might translate into a potential future for the rest of the newspaper industry.  As per usual it is NOT the industry itself that has figured this out but the thinkers outside the industry.

Which is exactly what would have been predicted by those two guys in that book I was reading.


What Makes Great TV?                                                                                     

Here’s a question that could make us all rich if we can just come up with the answer.  What makes compelling television?  What I mean by that is what needs to be done to create the kind of television that people will really want to watch?  It’s also called “appointment television”.  In the old days, you know like 2010, before you could watch television shows on the internet, most TV was appointment TV.  People would plan to be home at such and such a time on such and such a night to catch a show.

There is still some of that.  Most recently were the final episodes of AMC’s show “Breaking Bad” are shows that will have the shows fans glued to their seats.  Sure you could record it and time shift the program but the reality is that no one wants to miss really good TV.  That’s the compelling part.  You want to be able to talk about the show.

Now there are two things we do know about making compelling television.  First, that some people are already doing it.  The second is that plenty of other people don’t have a clue.  These are the people who need our help.

Now most commonly there are two ways for people who don’t really get it to try and fake their way to compelling programming.  The first is get as racy as possible.  It’s tough if you’re working on network TV because of the FCC regulations.  We’re seeing more and more cable channels seeing how far they can go.  A recent NPR story said that AMC actually has a limit on the number of times the “f-bomb” can be said.  In the end does that really create “Must See TV”?  Only in the short run.  The problem with relying on shock is that after a while the audience gets used to it and it’s not shocking anymore.  “Breaking Bad” has certainly been shocking in its run.  At the same time it has also offered memorable characters and great storylines.

The other way that folks try to create that special TV is to re-make the hits.  Steal ideas, do spin-offs and sequels.  If you pick the right ideas or follow the right characters from one show to the next.  So it’s interesting to note that now that “Breaking Bad” is ending its run the producers have to try and create some new compelling programming.

What are they doing?  Creating a sequel.



The Cyrus Thing                                                                                                      

I was really hoping that I could avoid this whole thing.  It’s stupid, and pointless and very much a tempest in a teapot.  I don’t care that it was the lead story on news outlets that should have known better the morning after it took place.  The fact that it is still managing to be news is astounding.  What’s worse is that by actually taking notice of it here I’m actually becoming one of those people who keep it high profile.

But it just won’t go away.

What is it?  It’s the Miley Cyrus...you groaned right there, didn’t you?  I don’t blame you.  It’s a stupid story about a stupid act.  

The latest bump up for this stupid story is an equally stupid story in USA Today in an interview with dowager rock queen Cher.  In the interview itself she pretty much trashes Miley.  Not because it was bad taste, let’s face it that’s a subject that Cher has no standing on, but because she thought it was badly done.  Once the story was published there was the inevitable backlash and Cher sort of backed away from her comments.

And that’s really the unfortunate part in my opinion.  Cher DOES have standing to discuss outrageous female stage performance.  That is almost certainly why McNewspaper asked her the question.  Sadly what Cher retreated to a “she’s pushing the envelope, being an artist” stance that smacks of PR timidity.

If what Cyrus did was in fact art somehow, and you can count me among those who find that concept dubious at best, then it ought to be able to stand up to scrutiny by people with expertise in that area.  That’s part of the whole process and always has been.
So by backing away from her criticism Cher is pretty much telling us that she realizes it’s more about the outrage than the art.

Which is, of course, what most of the rest of us realize from the outset.  So how do we fight back against the onslaught of these nonsense stories?  Two ways I think.  The first is follow the path Cher took before she lost her nerve.  Treat it like art and then take it apart.  It will become obvious quickly to the vast majority of people that’s it not worth the time and effort.

The second way?  What I wish I could have done from the beginning.

Just ignore it.  The stories die without sunlight.

Call that the View From the Phlipside

Friday, July 19, 2013

The Perils of Pop Stardom, E-book readers Part 2, Your Kids Might Be Rednecks



 "The View From the Phlipside" is a media commentary program airing on WRFA-LP, Jamestown NY.  It can be heard Tuesday through Friday just after 8 AM and 5 PM.  The following are scripts which may not exactly match the aired version of the program.  Mostly because the host may suddenly choose to add or subtract words at a moments notice.  WRFA-LP is not responsible for any such silliness or the opinions expressed.  You can listen to a live stream of WRFA or find a podcast of this program at wrfalp.com.  Copyright 2013 by Jay Phillippi.  All Rights Reserved.  You like what you see?  Drop me a line and we can talk.



Program scripts from week of July 8, 2013


My name is Jay Phillippi and I've spent my life in and around the media.  TV, radio, the movies and more.  I love them, and I hate them and I always have an opinion.  Call this the View from the Phlipside. 

Your Kids Might Be Rednecks                                                                              

Being a parent these days means that you are faced with a seemingly endless list of potential pitfalls for your children.  As someone one who works with teens I know it seems that every week there’s some new fad or trend that I need to pass along to parents so they know.  But this one may come as a surprise.  You may want to check but it’s possible that your kids are becoming or have become rednecks.

The first thing we’ll need to do is deal with the whole concept of redneck.  People tend to fall into two groups when it comes to the term  - those for whom it is a negative and those for whom it is a badge of honor. In media terms today redneck can be defined as a culture or a way of looking at culture that is based in a more rural or working class point of view.  In a day and age when we are predominantly an urban culture dominated by technology there is a growing popularity of what seems like a simpler way of life.

Don’t believe me?  Take a look at the current trend of popular TV shows starting with “Duck Dynasty”.  The show has amassed some huge ratings about a group of folks who proudly proclaim themselves and their lifestyle as “redneck”.  Then check out shows like “Swamp People”, “Buck Wild”.  Add in shows that are aimed at a much more blue collar lifestyle like “Deadliest Catch” and “Ice Road Truckers”.  Once you get thinking about it there is a HUGE number of shows like this all over cable these days.  If you’ve noticed an increase in the amount of plaid and denim being worn by pop culture figures you’ve already seen the effect it is having on society.  The interesting thing is that these shows model some interesting intersections like National Geographic Channel’s “Rocket City Rednecks” a show about a group of redneck scientists bringing some down home inventiveness to some real world problems and advanced engineering challenges.

What’s really funny is that we’ve been through this before.  Head back to the mid-60’s.  “The Andy Griffith Show”, “Gomer Pyle, USMC”, “The Beverly Hillbillies”, and the syndicated hit of “Hee Haw”.  You could probably add in the westerns of that same time period into the mix as well.

Given that redneck culture TV tends to support concept like family and hard work maybe it’s not the worst thing that could be influencing our kids.


Future of e-books Part 2                                                                                        

Last week I commented on the future of the e-book reader based on the less than thrilling sales numbers of Barnes and Noble’s Nook.  I wondered if the window for that particular technology might be closing sooner than we might have expected.  I wrote and recorded that program on Monday night.  On Tuesday morning the CEO of Barnes and Noble resigned without warning.

I would love to say those two events were connected in ANY way but my momma raised me to not tell lies.  We’re still not sure why William Lynch Jr resigned only 3 years into his tenure.  What we do know is that Barnes and Noble, a company that is still primarily a brick and mortar bookstore company, now has another problem on their plate.  In addition to chasing Amazon, Google and many others are moving into the competition for digital books.

If Barnes and Noble is going to survive they have to make the right decisions in the next 12 months.  Make the wrong ones right now and they will probably never recover.  What you do in a moment like this is pretty obvious just not necessarily easy.  You build on your strengths, you find what the audience wants and you give it to them.  

So if I’m being asked where to focus here’s what I tell them.  You’re a bookstore.  Book lovers love book stores.  But it’s not the vast impersonal big box book store that lights our fire.  It’s the one where we can feel like part of the culture, where the staff are knowledgable and helpful.  Don’t think Target think the Apple Store.  Think about creating a bookworm version of the Genius bar.  Book lovers want to come in and relax and love books.  Unless you come in the middle of the day it’s tough finding a seat in the reading areas at the Buffalo Barnes and Noble.  

The next step is so obvious that I’m astounded I need to say it.  But it’s time to drop some big bucks on getting the word out about who you are and what you offer.  The Nook e-reader is generally highly regarded but when was the last time you saw an ad for one?

There is a future for B&N.  Whether it’s a successful merger of brick and mortar with digital or bankruptcy will rest on the decisions they make in the wake of last week’s CEO exit.

I’m pretty confident in that prediction too.


Perils of Pop Stardom                                                                                                                   


There is nothing harder in this world to overcome in popular culture, no obstacle more challenging to surmount in a career than to be a teenage pop star.  The highway of fame is littered with folks who simply never found the way to make the transition from cute child star to adult working professional.

Note I don’t even talk about making the transition from star to star.  Making the transition from teen star to just having a career as an adult is incredibly hard.

Why is that?  I think there’s a lot of reasons.  First of all you have that shift from “cute” to something else.  There’s the fact that your audience is growing up, same as you.  You can’t keep doing the stuff you did when you were 14 aimed at a 14 year old audience once you pass about 17.  It just gets creepy.  The same problem happens to the pop star themselves.  Who are they really?  Any teenager wants to shed their younger persona while at the same time you have the distorted reality of being, well, a pop star.  It’s hard enough to be a teen in a regular life.  Imagine one with everything from more money than you’ve ever seen before to people who have quite simply lost their minds about you.  How do you find your way to an adult persona in the middle of all that foolishness?

What brings all of this to mind is watching the recent derailments in Justin Bieber’s career.  Think about this - Justin Bieber didn’t hit the Top 10 in the U.S. till 2010.  So in just three years we’ve gone from teeny bopper heart throb to having the largest janitor’s union in the country mad at him when he used a floor bucket as his own personal bathroom.  There have been other dopey moments along the way, like suggesting that Holocaust icon Anne Frank might have been a “belieber” if she’d lived today.  You just don’t go there.  The “Beebs” is 19 years old and that puts him right on the bullseye of this challenge.  A 20 year old still targeting a tweener audience just won’t work.  Meanwhile defining your “adulthood” through clubbing, obscenity and poor potty habits isn’t going to win you a lot of even young adult listeners.  To them you still carry the taint of teeny bopper stardom.

What should he do?  Well get his mom to stop defending him in print wouldn’t hurt.  No one will take you seriously if your mom is still telling everyone what a nice boy you are.  Oh and maybe he should talk to his stylist.  Every time I see a current photo of him I think it’s Vanilla Ice.

Surely that can’t be what they’re going for.


Call that the View From the Phlipside