Monday, December 16, 2013

Movie Review - Argo

Argo - (2012) - Based (somewhat loosely) on the rescue of six Americans that escaped from the U.S. Embassy in Tehran at the beginning of the Iranian Hostage Crisis in 1980.  A plan to get them out under cover of a fake movie company working on a movie called "Argo".  The question is always will they escaped before the Iranians unravel the story?

Three Academy Awards, two Golden Globes, a Screen Actors Guild Award, the accolades are pretty impressive for this one.  And with good reason.  This is a great thriller.  It has all the tension you could want.  Ben Affleck plays the American extraction expert Tony Mendez who will have to go into Iran and pull off the deception.  The six in hiding aren't all convinced that this is a good idea which raises the stakes even higher.  All it will take is one slip and they will all go down.  Iran at that moment in time bore entirely too many similarities to the Reign of Terror that followed the French Revolution.  It's a great set up for the story.

It's also one of those places where you need to divide fact from fiction.  The screenplay takes some serious liberties with the truth.  (It also takes quite a few minor liberties but that's normal.  You need to move things around sometimes for movie story telling.  I have no trouble with that at all).  The worst is downplaying the role of the Canadian Embassy in the rescue.  President Carter has been quoted as saying "90%" of the idea behind the rescue was Canadian.  And while the real Tony Mendez did do the extraction he was in Tehran for a grand total of a day and a half.  Affleck tries to make up for the snub of the real heroes behind the  rescue with a post-script on the movie but it comes off flat.  That's unfortunate.  It reinforces the perception in parts of the world that Americans are self centered egotists who need to hold the spotlight at all times.

That to one side - it's a lot of fun to watch.

Rating - **** Recommended (but read the history afterwards)

Friday, December 13, 2013

Movie Review - Beasts of the Southern Wild

Beasts of the Southern Wild (2012) The fantastical story of a six year old girl living at the edges of the world along the coast of Louisiana.  Alone with her father they face the trials of his failing health and a storm surge that wipes out their community.  For Hushpuppy her father's health and the rising ocean levels become linked and she struggles with the belief that she has somehow broken the world.

From the very first moment of the movie you know this is not going to be like every other movie you've ever seen.  The six year old is our guide and narrator (played by FIVE year old Quvenzhane Willis) and the vision we get is filled with imagination and fears of a child.  Her dreams are haunted by fierce "aurochs" (aurochs were the forerunners of modern cattle but in Hushpuppy's vision they are horned, pig-like creatures  that kill the weak) and the voice of her missing mother. She holds animals (and the occasional human) to her ear to hear what they're saying.  She is ferocious in the pursuit of what she needs.  Raised to be independent in many ways far beyond her years Hushpuppy doesn't recognize that she's too little to get what she wants.

Hushpuppy's world is one of secrets and mystery and wonder.  Willis is ferocious as Hushpuppy.  This is her movie completely and utterly.  It is a truly astounding journey.

Rating - ***** Must See

Squirrels, The Past is the Future and What is Privacy?



 "The View From the Phlipside" is a media commentary program airing on WRFA-LP, Jamestown NY.  It can be heard Monday through Friday just after 8 AM and 5 PM.  The following are scripts which may not exactly match the aired version of the program.  Mostly because the host may suddenly choose to add or subtract words at a moments notice.  WRFA-LP is not responsible for any such silliness or the opinions expressed.  You can listen to a live stream of WRFA or find a podcast of this program at wrfalp.com.  Copyright 2013 by Jay Phillippi.  All Rights Reserved.  You like what you see?  Drop me a line and we can talk.

Program scripts from week of December 8, 2013


My name is Jay Phillippi and I've spent my life in and around the media.  TV, radio, the movies and more.  I love them, and I hate them and I always have an opinion.  Call this the View from the Phlipside. 

What is Privacy?                                                                                               

I was going to start this program by saying we were “returning” to the subject of online privacy but in reality it’s a topic that hasn’t ever really gone away.  Concerns about our personal information range from the mundane worry about identity theft to the far more esoteric visions of Big Brother and the NSA looking over our shoulders monitoring everything we say, do or share online.

So let’s say that it has just bubbled back up to the surface once again. You’ve probably heard the story about so many of the big players in digital communication coming together to protest and push back on the NSA’s work online.  Microsoft, Apple, Twitter, Facebook, Google, Yahoo, LinkedIn and AOL have sent a letter to the President and Congress outlining their grave concerns about the threat to individual liberties and the American business interests.  It’s a fairly impressive grouping if only because most of those companies spend every waking hour plotting against one another.

Microsoft has gone even farther to protect its business interests.  One of the concerns about the latest push for American based Internet security measures is that the U.S. government may use those laws to seize information belonging to foreign companies.  The folks out in Redmond, Washington have issued a very clear statement that they would fight any such attempt.

I am not casting aspersions on the patriotic intentions of these companies but don’t underestimate the importance of the business angle to them.  American companies have enormous investments all around the world.  A serious attack on the privacy of those services would be a potentially crippling blow to the U.S. economy.

At the same time it doesn’t hurt to think about some more mundane potential infringements.  Recent stories are showing a serious backlash against the Google Glass technology.  Suddenly people are realizing that the person sitting across the room from them could be recording everything that is said and done there.  Another story shows that intelligence agencies have been monitoring online gaming sites like World of Warcraft.

Privacy was actually much easier to maintain when more of our lives were actually private.  As our lives are lived more and more in the digital community privacy becomes a far more elusive commodity.

In fact it may be time to reconsider the entire question of just what we mean by and want from,  when it comes to privacy.

Whither Microsoft?                                                                                                 

I had a moment of real nostalgia last week.  For the first time in quite a while I actually sat down and read a newspaper.  Once upon a time reading the paper or several papers was an everyday routine.  I couldn’t wait to get the morning paper.  Sometimes the news department had to come stomping into the studio and reclaim it because they weren’t done with it.  As a pure information junkie I can get my hunger satisfied from lots of sources these days.  But there is something about the experience of sitting down with a newspaper that I truly miss.  The routines of how you read it (I was a back to front guy), how you fold it while you read it, all those things.  Sitting waiting for an order to be filled was a real joy with a newspaper in hand.

It’s interesting that the latest development in the ongoing struggle of the newspaper industry to come to grips with life online is to recognize that there is something to be retained from those traditions.  The New York Times has just released it’s latest update of its “Today’s Paper” app for tablet and desktop.  They looked at what the users of the earlier versions used most commonly.  To the surprise of some folks it was the “Today’s Paper” section.  Surprising because it was the part of the earlier app that is the most like an old fashion newspaper.  The layout is designed to look like a newspaper.  Everything is laid out just they way it would be in the print version of The Grey Lady.

I always find it funny when I hear modern information snobs sneer at the newspaper.  The reality is that the newspaper is just the precursor to the modern aggregator website.  Certainly the customization options were very limited but then you also had the expertise of professional journalist searching all the news of the world.  A newspaper is just that, a news aggregating operation.  They gather together all kinds of stories from many different sources.  Today many of us think we’re better at picking the news we want to see.  But the failure of that system is right there in that last sentence.  You only see the news you want to see.  

I find a lot of the current generation of news source web pages cluttered and annoying.  Maybe the folks at the New York Times are onto something by going old school.

Squirrels!                                                                                                                   

So can someone out there explain the squirrels to me?  All of a sudden I turn on my TV and it’s squirrels as far as the eye can see.  Not cute little, furry Squirrel Nutkin kind of squirrels.  Mostly evil, weird, aggressive, dangerous ones.

It started with coupon clipping squirrels.  A husband has trained squirrels to help his family save money.  Instead they rise revolt against a life of clipping servitude (and really who can blame them?) and attack the husband.  All of this is supposed to make you want to shop at Sears.  I’m still working on that one.

Then we move on to the man attacked by squirrels in the park.  When suddenly surrounded by an entire squirrelly gang intent on doing him violence our hero in this one attempts to talk his way out of trouble.  Surprisingly the squirrels do not respond to commands and, you guessed it, attack him.  The flipside, you should pardon the expression, of this campaign shows the same guy sitting peacefully on his couch giving verbal instructions to his Direct-TV set finding nice movies for his children to watch.

The third ad that has a decidedly less violent squirrel presence but it’s no less creepy.  A lady flying on a plane is suffering from some sort of intestinal distress.  At which point the seat tray in front of her swings open to display a secret compartment.  It contains the new travel version of Pepto Bismol and...a squirrel.  This squirrel gets all inappropriately snuggly with the woman as it pitches the advantages of a little Pepto on the road.

At the end of all this my question is simple?  Whose stupid idea are these ads?  What’s the message I’m supposed to take away from this?  All of these animals are just flat out scary.  There’s no cute here, there’s no funny here, there’s just the stuff of childhood nightmares.
The part that’s really interesting is - did three different ad agencies come up with the same idea or has one agency made a major investment in these little animatronic squirrels and is pushing it on all their customers?  Of course in the end someone at each one of the sponsors had to approve the campaign.  So there’s actually a whole bunch of people who think that weird, dangerous, aggressive, creepy squirrels are a winning approach to selling stuff.

And that’s just nuts.

Call that the View From the Phlipside

Monday, December 9, 2013

Movie Review - "42"

"42" (2013) -  The story of the player that broke the color barrier in Major League Baseball.  Jackie Robinson was chosen by Brooklyn Dodgers General Manager Bra.nch Rickey as the player with both the skill and the strength of character to make history.

Jackie Robinson's story is one of the amazing tales in the world of sports.  Rickey (played by Harrison Ford) decided to take on the unwritten rule that black players were not permitted in the Majors.  Robinson (played by Chadwick Boseman) faced an astounding challenge with virtually no support system.  The movie does a wonderful job of walking through the issues that surrounded this moment in history.  Good writing, acting, and directing.  Nothing gets in the way of the story.

There is one unfortunate historical goof.  Much is made of the conflict between Robinson and a Pirate pitcher named Fritz Ostermueller.  In the movie he hits Robinson in the head.  It never happened in real life and it's unfortunate that they tagged him with a particularly nasty moment.

There's one final reason why this movie is great.  Prior to "42" the baseball movie with the highest opening weekend gross receipts was a movie called "The Benchwarmers".  Astoundingly this Rob Schneider/David Spade movie held the record at over 19 million dollars.  Perhaps even more astounding is the fact that this bad movie (I have I seen the movie?  No.  How do I know it's a bad movie?  It's a Rob Schneider movie.  Case closed.) finished the year as the #52 movie gross of 2006 with 59 million dollars.  How is it that no other real baseball movie managed a better opening weekend than this one?  "Moneyball" just missed.  "The Benchwarmers" out grossed "The Natural", "Bull Durham", "Major League" and "Eight Men Out" among others.  That's just so wrong.  Thank God for "42".

This is a really outstanding movie.

Rating - **** Recommended

Friday, December 6, 2013

On Death and Dying, Whither Microsoft, Celebrity Endorsers



 "The View From the Phlipside" is a media commentary program airing on WRFA-LP, Jamestown NY.  It can be heard Monday through Friday just after 8 AM and 5 PM.  The following are scripts which may not exactly match the aired version of the program.  Mostly because the host may suddenly choose to add or subtract words at a moments notice.  WRFA-LP is not responsible for any such silliness or the opinions expressed.  You can listen to a live stream of WRFA or find a podcast of this program at wrfalp.com.  Copyright 2013 by Jay Phillippi.  All Rights Reserved.  You like what you see?  Drop me a line and we can talk.

Program scripts from week of December 1, 2013


My name is Jay Phillippi and I've spent my life in and around the media.  TV, radio, the movies and more.  I love them, and I hate them and I always have an opinion.  Call this the View from the Phlipside. 

Celebrity Endorsers                                                                                               

It was just about a month ago that I commented on a couple of commercials that I really liked.  That included two tequila commercials involving Ray Liotta and Kiefer Sutherland.  I haven’t changed my mind about them but I have done a little more thinking about the genre of commercials.  Specifically the celebrity endorsement.

What really got me going was someone noting that since the Ron Burgundy character started touting the Dodge brand (or Yodge as Ron calls them) sales of certain models have jumped by nearly 60%.

All because a FICTIONAL character endorsed them.  A fictional character who, let’s be honest, is more than a bit of an idiot.

So what I’m really thinking about when it comes to celebrity endorsements is - Why do we care?

Honestly, why would having Ray Liotta be the front man for an adult beverage, or any product, make a difference to us?  Most of us are smart enough to know that we’re supposed to think that if we use that product we’ll be as cool or sexy or smart or good looking as the celebrity in the ad.  But we don’t seriously BELIEVE that, do we?

For the record, there is nothing you or I can do to be as cool as Ray Liotta.  Nothing.

It doesn’t matter what car you drive, toothpaste you use, adult beverage you consume.  It won’t make you anything that you aren’t already.  But they keep trotting out celebrity endorser after celebrity endorser.  I have to believe they do it because we keep buying it.  And that’s really kind of sad.

It’s sad because these endorsers aren’t any smarter than we are.  Most of them aren’t even better looking than we are.  Trust me, if you had a team of experts making you over you’d look great too.  In fact this is mostly about money.  Pay the price and get the celebrity of choice pumping your product.  Stop paying and they won’t mention your product or service again.

Seriously people, you’d buy a truck because Ron Burgundy told you to buy a “Yodge”?

Really?


Whither Microsoft?                                                                                                 

Finding Steve Ballmer’s replacement at Microsoft isn’t quite the corporate culture shifting mega-deal that finding the new guiding visionary to replace Steve Jobs at Apple is but it’s just part of the big changes that could be bubbling under the surface out in Redmond Washington.

As much as folks like Google would like to believe that they are truly in the running to be the “big dog” of the digital world it’s hard to say anyone has surpassed Microsoft at the top of the heap.  Just think about the number of computers running the Windows operating system which is approximately 90% of all the personal computers in the world, then add in the alleged one billion users of Microsoft’s Office suite and I’m not sure anyone has any more claim to being the 900 pound gorilla in the room.  Toss in fun little things like the Xbox and suddenly Microsoft looms large.

So when one of the founders of Microsoft starts talking about breaking up the monster we should probably all perk up our ears.  Paul Allen, who founded the company with Bill Gates, is now talking about just that.  Allen says that Microsoft should spin off products like Xbox because they are not the core of the business.  Billions of dollars could be suddenly brought into play by turning Xbox and the search engine “Bing” (and it’s advertising revenues) over to new corporate ownership.  That would allow Microsoft to focus on what it’s always done.  There’s still tons of money to be made on operating systems (even if the percentage of new computers running some version of Windows has declined each of the last several years) and on what’s called “enterprise” software.  That’s software aimed at corporate or large organization users in simplest terms.

Now I’m the last person to be offering business advice to anyone, let alone a multi-national corporation, but I suppose that it makes sense at the surface level.  

At the same time the real experts in this field seem to feel that the days of the classic software based computer program is rapidly coming to a close.  Add in that a larger percentage of even that business has been shifting to open source software and suddenly the decision looks less logical.  Why cut loose divisions that continue to make money so you can focus on the one that probably can see the end of the road?

It will be interesting to see what direction the new top dogs at both Apple and Microsoft intend to take these two titans of the digital world.

On Death and Dying                                                                                                                   

When I first thought about discussing the death of TV character Brian Griffin and the furor that followed I was planning on sending an order down to the Department of Snark for a little extra this.  As I’ve spent some time thinking about the death of characters on television I’ve found myself on the other side of the issue.

Brian Griffin, in case the name means nothing to you, was the talking dog character on the Fox Network’s modestly successful animated show “Family Guy”.  He was hit by a car and killed last week.  The fandom went nuts the following day.  Now I’ve never watched “Family Guy” but it seemed a little over the top to me.

Then I started thinking about the death of TV characters over the years.  There are three primary reasons for characters to die.  The first is that the actor who played the character actually dies.  Thus, “Sesame Street” had to deal with the death of Mr. Hooper or when “NewsRadio” had to deal with the death of Bill McNeal when actor Phil Hartman died.  The second reason is when the actor gets into a fight with the producers.  Most recently we saw the death of Charlie Harper on “Two and A Half Men” when Charlie Sheen went all, well, Charlie Sheen a couple years ago.  Killing off a star would seem to be a tough decision but it’s been done before.  In 1987 Valerie Harper was fired from the show that bore her name and her character was killed after a hold out over salary.  Got to wonder if the name Harper is jinxed.

Of course the final reason to kill a character off is as part of the story.  Edith Bunker died on “Archie’s Place”,  Chuckles the Clown died on the “Mary Tyler Moore Show” resulting in one of the funniest episodes of all time.  Dan Connor died on “Roseanne”, Susan Ross died on “Seinfeld”, Bobby Ewing died on “Dallas”.  Ok, maybe that’s not a good example.

The ultimate character death for me though is Henry Blake on “M*A*S*H”.  The story goes that the cast was not told what the closing dialogue was going to be.  So when Walter Burghoff’s character “Radar” O’Reilly makes the fateful announcement in the operating room the shock on the face of the cast isn’t acting.  It’s a powerful moment.

So since a tear forms for me every time I see that episode I don’t suppose I have any room to criticize fans of “Family Guy”.

Tell me when Brian’s wake is and I’ll come and raise a glass in his memory.


Call that the View From the Phlipside

Monday, December 2, 2013

Movie Review - Life of Pi

Life of Pi (2012) - A young man is shipwrecked in the Pacific and has to find a way to survive on a lifeboat with a Bengal tiger.  The story is told in flashback by the adult Pi to an interested writer.

This is one of those movies that I really wish I could have seen on the big screen.  The visuals on this one are just stunning.  When the backdrop for your action is the sky and ocean in the mid Pacific the grandeur is pretty epic.  The CGI tiger is actually pretty amazing as well.  Director Ang Lee makes the most of the visuals he's given.  The bulk of the move falls onto the shoulders of Suraj Sharma who does most of his acting with a computer generated co-worker.

The obvious parallel here is Tom Hanks's 2000 film "Castaway".  It is the story of a solitary man trying to survive.  The major difference is that Wilson wasn't to kill and eat Hanks's character.  This is a much more mystical story than "Castaway".  With that fantastical element included Lee can take us to wonderful and surprising places.

I wasn't anticipating the very strong spiritual aspect of the story.  Pi's journey through life is in search of his personal relationship with the Divine.  He experiences the Hinduism of his native land along with Christianity, Islam and the rational atheism of his father.  The story never becomes preachy but it gives the story telling another, mystical avenue for the story of Pi.

An amazing fantasy tail and visually stunning.

Rating- **** Recommended

Friday, November 29, 2013

Christmas Mistake, Where Do You Go?, Unreal Reality



 "The View From the Phlipside" is a media commentary program airing on WRFA-LP, Jamestown NY.  It can be heard Monday through Friday just after 8 AM and 5 PM.  The following are scripts which may not exactly match the aired version of the program.  Mostly because the host may suddenly choose to add or subtract words at a moments notice.  WRFA-LP is not responsible for any such silliness or the opinions expressed.  You can listen to a live stream of WRFA or find a podcast of this program at wrfalp.com.  Copyright 2013 by Jay Phillippi.  All Rights Reserved.  You like what you see?  Drop me a line and we can talk.

Program scripts from week of November 24, 2013


My name is Jay Phillippi and I've spent my life in and around the media.  TV, radio, the movies and more.  I love them, and I hate them and I always have an opinion.  Call this the View from the Phlipside. 

Unreal Reality                                                                                                        

So let’s start off today with a question.  Pretty simple one really.  If you were signed to appear in a reality show, a reality show that was about the work you do, what would you expect?  Doesn’t really matter what you do, the show is about the line of work you’re in rather than about you.  So we’re talking “Deadliest Catch” (which is about crab fishing in the Bering Sea off the coast of Alaska) versus say “Keeping Up With The Kardashians” (which is about God only knows what).

Well, if you’re like a lot of the folks on these shows you might forget who, or rather what, is the center of the show.  I probably can’t blame them too much.  There you are on the screen, endlessly re-running, with an introduction that might even include your own little “nickname” (“The Hustler”, “The King”).  Oh and the fans!  You will have fans.  Fans who will argue about if you are the best part of the show or the worst.

It has to go to your head eventually.

Which explains a lot of the hubbub over at “Storage Wars”.  If you don’t know the show it’s about the folks who bid to clear out storage lockers after people default on their rentals.  I was a dedicated viewer for a while but the problem is that it all starts to look alike after a while.  The variety is in the personalities of the “cast”.  

So it was no doubt a huge surprise to a couple of the “stars” of the series when the network gave them the axe.  What choice did the producers have though?  You can’t fire the storage lockers.  So once things started to go stale you have only way to make changes.  You rotate out the cast members and replace them with someone who will bring some new schtick to the program.

Which brings us back to the original question?  What would you expect if it were you?  Just in case let me give you a model to follow.  Check Chumlee on the reality show “Pawn Stars”.  He commonly plays the “village idiot” on the show but reports are that he is stashing away the money he makes from doing personal appearances and has founded his own company to market various Chumlee novelties.  Chumlee seems to have figured out that fame in the reality TV game has a shelf life and is making the best of his time in the spotlight.

Turns out the “village idiot” may the smartest guy on TV.  Not the answer you expected, was it?

Where Do You Go?                                                                                                 

More and more of us spend more and more of our time online.  Whether it’s at a desktop computer, a laptop, tablet or on our smartphone we are spending more time keeping in touch with our world virtually.  That means different things for different people.  For some it’s various social media sites.  For others its some form of old school information sites like news, sports and weather.  Add in e-mail, text messages and more and you get the idea.  We spend a LOT of time in the digital universe.

So where do you spend most of your time?  Our browsers, Firefox, Chrome, Opera, Safari, Explorer, whatever, probably tell the story pretty clearly.  Most of us take the chance to make sure we can get to our favorite sites as easily as possible.  You do this by having your browser open to some of those sites in tabs and the rest can be placed on your Favorites bar.  So what would it say us, if we took a look at the stuff we want at easy access?

I offer mine as an example.  My primary browser is Chrome.  When I fire it up it gives my home page at igHome where I can scan news, sports and weather at a glance.  Next it is Facebook, then my blog feeds on Feedly and finally my to do list at Toodledo.  Pretty straight forward stuff.

Under that on the Favorites bar you’ll find links to both Blogger and WordPress for my two blogs (including the one for this program), then a link to MyDrive from Google because that’s where I do things like write these program scripts,  next comes Dropbox where I put the recorded versions of this program so WRFA can download them.  After that is my Netflix link (gotta keep my queue up to date), then MapMyRide to track my workouts (that one doesn’t get used as often as it should).  Finally you’ll my link to HootSuite, the application I use to control my social media posts, Google Play for when I need to have a little music in my life.  Last but not least is PhotoSig, a photo web site that I enjoy and don’t use nearly as much as I’d like.

So what would you learn about me by looking at my browser?  Well, about half of the items are related to the media, and about half of them are related to this program.  Yeah, that worries me a little.  I am both a media consumer and a content provider.

And I probably should work out more.

So where do you go?

Christmas Mistake                                                                                                                   

A couple times over the last few years I’ve taken some time to talk about my favorite Christmas movies.  Now because I’m allegedly very cranky on the subject of when Christmas media like music and movies should first start airing I will not start my annual viewing for another week.  However it’s not too early to start TALKING about the subject.

For this year I offer first some bad news and then some good news.  The bad news is that there are folks out there with no respect and no sense. These are the folks proposing to do a sequel of the Frank Capra classic “It’s A Wonderful Life”.  Worse than that it sounds like they are proposing a really bad sequel.  

My first thought when I read the story was that it was a fake.  But it was reported in “Variety” and several other respected sources seem to indicate that this bad idea is true.  The story says that they are proposing a script where Jimmy Stewart’s character “George Bailey”’s grandson, also named George Bailey, is visited by an angel to show him what the world would be like if Bailey redux had never been born.  That would be bad enough but the latter generation George is an unpleasant person apparently.

Then there’s the stunt casting.  Stunt casting is when you bring in a “name” actor to make an appearance in a movie or TV show.  Think, most of William Shatner’s career.  In this case the actor who played Zuzu Bailey in the original is to play the angel this time.

Feeling nauseated yet?  I could go on but it just makes me crazy.

The good news in all of this is that Paramount still owns the rights to “It’s A Wonderful Life” and all the characters.  They’ve issued a statement that they will block any attempt to make a sequel of any kind.  Let’s hope that they stick to that position.  At the same time it’s called the movie “business” for a reason.

Now if you really want a different take on“It’s A Wonderful Life” I can make a recommendation.  Check out a book called “The Last Temptation of Clarence Odbody” by John “Jughead” Pierson.  Warning, it’s a completely different take on the story.  But it’s pretty interesting.

And that’s all I ask for at Christmas.  Something interesting under the tree.

Call that the View From the Phlipside

Monday, November 25, 2013

Movie Review - Some Like It Hot

Some Like It Hot (1959) - Set in Prohibition two musicians flee Chicago to avoid the threat of the mob after seeing  a St. Valentine's Day Massacre style murder. They flee to Florida dressed as women in an all girl band.  One of the funniest movies of all times ensues.

Where to even start with this one?  Written and directed by one of the greats of all time, Billy Wilder.  A cast that is top flight from top to bottom.  Marilyn Monroe, Tony Curtis and Jack Lemmon (who would win an Oscar nomination for this role) top the billing with equally fabulous actors in supporting roles (George Raft, Joe E. Brown, Pat O'Brien, Nehemiah Persoff).  Wilder's writing is sparkling as always and holds up amazingly well.  In it's time it was very controversial because of the cross dressing aspect of the story line. It was condemned by the National League of Decency and banned in Kansas.  Eventually it was one of the reasons that the archaic Production Code was eliminated.

Wilder has his usual fun taking shots at the powerful, Monroe is at her sultry sexiest.  Lemmon and Curtis are perfectly paired and handle the tempo of Wilder's dialogue with amazing skill.  The whole movie is just a text book example of the movie making art.  The sequences that switch from Curtis and Monroe on the yacht to Lemmon and Brown on the tango floor are fabulous.

There's a reason this one is considered a classic.  Actually there's a whole list of reasons.

Rating ***** Gotta Have It

Saturday, November 23, 2013

NaNoWriMo Update

The logo for NaNoWriMo

I am trying to keep a little bit of an update going on this.

Here we are so bold and optimistic at the beginning of the month.

And Here is at the end of Week One.  Clearly this is going to be a struggle.

You'll note no update on Week Two.  Yeah, a struggle.

Well now Week Three is in the bag.  And I have to face some grim reality.

I'm not going to make the 50,000 word goal.  Right now getting half way there will be a struggle.

And that's OK.  This has been a tough month.  Tough on the writing front and tough in the real life front as well.  Lots of time on the road.  Which means I'm not anywhere that I can write and I get home wiped out.  Not a good writing place.  So I haven't put up the kind of numbers I'd like.

But what's come out of this has been something else.  I have no intention of quitting.  I will write when I can.  I'll put up as many words as I can.  What I have managed to produce has been pretty good.  I'm filling in holes that need to be filled.  I'm getting closer to finishing this book.

And THAT is the real goal.  The rest is just for fun.

Current word total - 16,093

Friday, November 22, 2013

Day of the Doctor, R.I.P. Blockbuster, Too Much Information



 "The View From the Phlipside" is a media commentary program airing on WRFA-LP, Jamestown NY.  It can be heard Monday through Friday just after 8 AM and 5 PM.  The following are scripts which may not exactly match the aired version of the program.  Mostly because the host may suddenly choose to add or subtract words at a moments notice.  WRFA-LP is not responsible for any such silliness or the opinions expressed.  You can listen to a live stream of WRFA or find a podcast of this program at wrfalp.com.  Copyright 2013 by Jay Phillippi.  All Rights Reserved.  You like what you see?  Drop me a line and we can talk.

Program scripts from week of November 17, 2013


My name is Jay Phillippi and I've spent my life in and around the media.  TV, radio, the movies and more.  I love them, and I hate them and I always have an opinion.  Call this the View from the Phlipside. 

Too Much Information                                                                                       

There are a lot of us who worry about how much information there is floating around about us out on the internet.  Whether you’re concerned about stalkers or identity thieves or avoiding certain failed romantic entanglements from your past there are a lot of reasons to be watchful over your personal information.  Of course the information that’s floating out there is largely what we’ve put there.  The rest are the public records that become easier and easier to access.

Now some of us will try to hide some of that personal information.  In fact for some people it becomes a bit of a priority.  That’s where those pesky public records come into play.

In this case an actress is very upset with the information that is out there about her.  Specifically, her age.  Like generations of actresses before her Junie Hoang had lied about her age.  Nine years ago she had gone on the website IMDB (Internet Movie Data Base) and created a profile for herself.  IMDB has become pretty much the go to website for information about actors in movies and on TV.  Apparently even for folks like casting agents.  So it was important that Ms. Hoang present the version of herself that gave her the best chance of getting work.  So she cut 7 years off her age.  A few years later she decided to just drop the whole birthdate on her profile.  At which point IMDB refused to change the entry unless she could prove it was wrong.  Which she could of course but didn’t want to.  After repeated requests were turned down someone at the website used information from the credit card used to create the account, found out her real name, looked in those troublesome public records and found out her real age.  And then added that information to her profile.

At which point she sued.  The first round went to Amazon owned IMDB but the actress is appealing the verdict.

The reality is that Hollywood plays unfair games with actresses as they get older.  Junie Hoang has made a career in smaller roles but she’s made a career.  A career that just might be jeopardized because IMDB decided to play holier than thou.  It’s possible that they did nothing wrong under the law.

But the violated one of the unwritten rules of the Internet.  On the Internet you get to be who you want to be.  I’m rooting for Junie on the appeal.

RIP Blockbuster                                                                                                    

Upon occasion we remember the passing of figures in the world of the media.  More often than not they are folks who were cult stars or lesser known behind the scenes types who don’t get the big front page notices when they make their final exit.

Today I thought we’d take a moment to remember a former giant of the media world that had fallen on hard times in the last couple years.  Heck, let’s be honest this star had started fading years ago.  You have to kind of wonder what took so long to shuffle off this mortal coil.

In this case it’s not an actor or special effects magician but the video store chain Blockbuster.  Be honest, when you heard the announcement last week that Dish Network, who bought the chain back in 2011, was closing the last 300 stores was your first thought “There are still Blockbuster Video stores in the world?”?  Yeah, me too.

My second thought was that I kinda missed the old days.  Walking the racks looking for a movie for the weekend always reminded me of checking the stacks in the library.  You never knew what fascinating discovery might be waiting for you.  Some little gem that you’d heard about but never seen or even better something that was totally new to you.  Movie nerd nirvana.

Then I remembered.  That almost never happened.  Why?  Because places like Blockbuster were always aimed at the great middle of the viewing audience.  This is why you would find a dozen copies of whatever had been popular in the last year.  Didn’t matter if it was an utter piece of drivel.  If there were anything really interesting in the collection you could certain of two things.

First, there would only be one copy.  Second, that copy would be checked out already.

So in the end I am not particularly unhappy with the demise of the classic video store.  I have a much wider selection of movies going back decade after decade through services like Netflix than I would have had at every Blockbuster store combined.

For a brief shining moment places like Blockbuster were a great new entry way into the wider world of the movies.  But that moment has come and gone.

Blockbuster Video was 28 years old.

Day of the Doctor                                                                                                                   

Lots of people get crazy about lots of different things.  I work with teens so I see them getting all hot and bothered about their favorite new band, movie star or teen star.  I have a long time friend who is very clear.  Saturdays are off limits.  If you want to come watch college football with him that’s fine, otherwise, pick another day for a visit.

There’s not a lot I get that excited about.  I love sports but I don’t live or die with my teams (which is a good thing since I’m a Pittsburgh Pirates fan), the only college game I must see every year is the Army/Navy game (Go Navy, Beat Army!).  Twenty plus years in music radio pretty took the shine off of most music stars.  I love their work but I’ve watched too many of them crash and burn to put them up on pedestals.

But this weekend there is something coming that does bring a bit of the fan boy out in me.  I haven’t been this excited about a media event in a very long time.  You see Saturday is the Day of the Doctor.  I’ve mentioned before that I’m a fan of the long running BBC science fiction series “Doctor Who”.  Saturday November 23rd marks the 50th anniversary of the very first episode of the show.  To borrow from the Grateful Dead “What a long strange trip it’s been”.

The truly amazing part of this is that the series has had as long a run as it has.  The original series was intended as a semi-educational family show.  I’m certain no one expected it to become an media icon and a multi-media smash.  The original episodes were so low budget it’s a little embarrassing to watch today.

So why has the show endured?  Why is now on it’s on to its third or fourth generation of viewers?  I discovered the show on PBS while in college.  My daughter was a teenager when the show returned from the dead and she’s now as big a fan as her old man.

Even these cynical days there’s something appealing about a traveller looking to make the world a little better place.  The Doctor believes in the essential value of the human race even when we don’t.  Through his eyes we see our best qualities amid the trials and tribulations of being human.  We see that his eternal optimism endures even the pain and experience of a lifetime that is measured in centuries.

And I think that’s something worth getting excited about.

Call that the View From the Phlipside

Thursday, November 21, 2013

Book Review - Case Closed

Case Closed by Gerald Posner - (2013 reissue) - There is probably no more compelling mystery in modern American history than the assassination of President John F. Kennedy.  Since that day in November of 1963 trying to find the answer to that mystery has generated books, TV shows, movies and more.  The problem is that with each passing year and each addition to the collection the question seems to recede into the murk rather than grow clearer.

My own fascination with the JFK, Oswald, Ruby, the Warren Commission, the Texas School Book Depository, the Grassy Knoll, the Zapruder film and all the other "characters" in this epic began in high school.  Only a decade after the event it was all still seemingly very fresh.  The questions about what exactly the Warren Commission thought it was doing, the "magic bullet", the autopsy reports, the beginnings of the serious conspiracy theories, it was the ultimate mystery to dive head first into.  Thirty years later it lured my daughter into the murky depths of the question of - was Oswald alone?

What journalist Posner has done here is offer the best look at the question I've ever encountered.  He acknowledges the conspiracy theories and takes most of the major ones on head first.  The story follows Oswald step by step.  Everything that we KNOW, meaning that it can be documented or verified by witnesses who are not easily impeached, is laid out before the reader.  When you begin there many of the conspiracy theories quickly fall away.  In the end he presents a clear and compelling case that as much as we don't want to believe it there is only one answer.  Oswald was alone.

I can't remember if this is in the book or in something else I've read recently about the assassination but someone recently pointed out that we don't want to believe that a great man can be brought down by someone as unimpressive as Lee Harvey Oswald.  Great men must be defeated by other great men or by great conspiracies.  Sometimes it is Occam's Razor that will cut to the truth.  The conspiracies require a level of complexity and numbers of conspirators that simply isn't sustainable.  In the end the only answer is a disturbed man who was once a Marine, a much better than average shot in the right place at the wrong time.

The biggest struggle with the book will be Posner himself.  Unfortunately his track record includes some dubious professional decisions at one point in his career.  The best response he can offer is the careful documentation of each point.  Just the way my old high school Geometry teacher required, Posner shows his work.  The result is simply compelling and complete.

I had two problems with the ebook version I read.  Both of them are the result of the publisher staying too true to the style of traditional books.  Posner breaks his footnotes into categories - documentation notes that are technically end notes and detail notes that are treated as foot notes.  The problem is that the foot notes are bunched at the end of each chapter.  So when you complete reading the chapter you have to flip through multiple pages to get to the next chapter.  While you have to do that in a traditional book there is absolutely no excuse for it in an ebook.  The other problem also involves these innumerable notes.  Often something will both kinds, which requires two links.  I found it very annoying to not be able to get the one I wanted without hitting the other one.  Simply adding a space to give a little room for those of us with thicker fingers would have made the experience significantly better.

Beyond that Gerald Posner has written the book that should bring the long discussion to an end for the vast majority of us.  With careful scholarship and clear story telling he delivers just what the title promises.

After many long years the case is closed.

"Case Closed" is available at bookstores right now.

Rating - **** Recommended 

Zooooommmbbbiiessss!, Media Boycotts and Commercials on Parade



 "The View From the Phlipside" is a media commentary program airing on WRFA-LP, Jamestown NY.  It can be heard Monday through Friday just after 8 AM and 5 PM.  The following are scripts which may not exactly match the aired version of the program.  Mostly because the host may suddenly choose to add or subtract words at a moments notice.  WRFA-LP is not responsible for any such silliness or the opinions expressed.  You can listen to a live stream of WRFA or find a podcast of this program at wrfalp.com.  Copyright 2013 by Jay Phillippi.  All Rights Reserved.  You like what you see?  Drop me a line and we can talk.

Program scripts from week of November 10, 2013

(Somehow these got skipped.  Correcting that now!)

My name is Jay Phillippi and I've spent my life in and around the media.  TV, radio, the movies and more.  I love them, and I hate them and I always have an opinion.  Call this the View from the Phlipside. 

Commercials on Parade                                                                                       

Feels like I haven’t gone all fan boy on TV commercials for a while.  And at the moment there are several out there that I really like.  In case you haven’t grasped it yet, I like well made commercials.  

There are a couple of alcoholic beverage commercials that recently caught my eye.  Alcohol is a product that can’t actually advertise on it’s primary benefit.  They can not even wander into the neighborhood of “use our product and we will make you feel goooooooooood”.  So it inevitably becomes about other things.  For example, and this is not an ad campaign that I much like it just strikes me as odd, the folks at Coors are currently running a campaign that centers on the fact that their beer is really cold.  That’s it, just that it’s cold.  OK.  Meanwhile Budweiser is spending lots of time putting a human face on their corporate beer empire by introducing us to the regional brew masters.

Neither of these are the ads that caught my eye.  There are two tequila companies that have chosen almost the exact same approach.  To the point that I didn’t realize they were for two different products.  1800 brand has been going with a single spokesman for a while but they were going for a snarky, pseudo cool thing.  Now they’ve flipped that and gone with Ray Liotta who basically just challenges the manhood of anyone not drinking tequila.  Matching that are the folks at Jose Cuervo with Keifer Sutherland challenging the world to “Have A Story”.  Suddenly tequila is a sophisticated yet macho part of life.  With, of course, no hint of what else may come with a sample or three.

The other ad that has really jumped out at me is the T-Mobile “Jeremy” campaign.  Seems that Jeremy is an young adult son travelling in Europe.  Problem is that Jeremy insists on using data as if he were in the United States and the bill on his parent’s plan is getting enormous.  We learn all this through videos from Jeremy’s parents as they try to get their sons attention.  What really grabs me is that the spots take a fairly nerdy concept (overseas data use) and turn it into something that we can all understand and a situation that makes perfect sense.   That’s really advertising writing at it’s best.

Like a good TV series I can hardly wait to find out what’s next.


Media Boycotts                                                                                                    

I’ve maintained from the beginning with this commentary that I wasn’t going to get into movie reviews and the like.  Too many other people out there doing it.  I’d rather try and offer a starting point for the discussion about the media and its impact on our lives.

Having said that I will begin by saying this commentary begins with me going to see a movie.  I saw “Ender’s Game” based on the book of the same name by Orson Scott Card.  I thought it did an OK job of translating the book, which is a favorite, to the screen.  That’s the end of the movie review.

There’s a lot of noise about boycotting the movie because of some really outrageous comments starting with a threat to overthrow the Federal government if Marriage Equality becomes the law of the land to claiming that President Obama is creating a private army to insure that Michelle Obama is the next President of the United States.  There are plenty of people that come down on both sides of those issues.  Personally I think he’s nuts on these subjects.

But here’s the problem.  I also think Orson Scott Card is one of the best science fiction writers of the last 30 years.  “Ender’s Game” and its sequel “Speaker for the Dead” are in the top one percent for me.  

The question becomes are we really ready to start making media decisions based on the personal lives and opinions of the creators?  Are we ready to go all the way with that?

What would that mean?  Well, Ernest Hemingway was a drunk and pretty clearly a sexist.  Shall we stop reading the works of T.S. Eliot and Roald Dahl for the anti-semitism?  And of course that means we stop listening to the operas of Richard Wagner.  I’m not much of an opera fan but I’m told his stuff really rocks.  And along the way we should probably stop buying Ford vehicles because Henry Ford was an anti-semite too.

Is the dividing line that all those other people are dead?  I have many friends in the LGBT community and their supporters.  I would never argue with their right NOT to support an author like Orson Scott Card.  I’m just wondering where the line actually gets drawn.  And why.

Day of the Doctor                                                                                                                   

So I have to ask.  What’s with all the zombies right now?  I know it’s not really a new thing any more but it seems like every time I turn around there’s another zombie TV series, movie or book out there.  Sundance Channel just debuted the American version of the French hit “The Returned” which offers a different view of the undead than the hugely successful “The Walking Dead” on AMC.  It’s clear that zombies have turned the corner on popular culture warm fuzzies.  Like vampires before them we’re seeing more zombies that just want to live their lives.  Add in fun books like local author Lia Habel’s “Dearly, Departed” and zombies are a whole new thing.

Zombies aren’t new and it’s not their first change in PR image either.  Go back before the ‘60s and zombies are almost always shown with some connection with Voodoo.  These re-animated corpses got all the creepiness they needed out of being, well, re-animated dead people.  They were the slaves of the person who performed the rituals to bring them back.  Prior to the late ‘60s and that’s the kind of zombie you’ll see.  Check out the undead working for Bela Lugosi in 1932’s “White Zombie”.

All that changes, of course, in 1968.  You’ve been waiting for me to get here, right?  George Romero’s “Night of the Living Dead” brings us the zombies we know today.  Shuffling, decaying monsters who want braaaaaaaaaaainnss!  Since then we’ve pretty much dropped the old school zombie.  That is until this new batch of warm, cuddly undead.

So what’s with all the zombies?  The learned folk out there who study this kind of thing seem to have come up with a logical sounding explanation.  in the 1950s when the world was a scary and unpredictable place the movies were suddenly filled with aliens from outer space.  Technology was beginning to suddenly take over more and more of our lives.  People found that scary and the movies reflected those feelings.  Today we live in an age when it seems like there are a lot of people out there who don’t like us, where there are a lot of “things” being done by science that might be doing strange things to our bodies that we don’t understand.  In a time like that what better manifestation of our inner fears than an enemy that can not be reasoned with, who desires nothing more than our grim and frightening death?

So maybe this whole thing of making zombies a little more living friendly is a sign that we’re moving out of that phase of our culture again.  Why not?  Klaatu and Gort from “The Day the Earth Stood Still” morphed into “My Favorite Martian” in only a decade.


Call that the View From the Phlipside

Monday, November 18, 2013

Movie Review - Kiss Kiss Bang Bang

Kiss Kiss Bang Bang (2005) - A thief stumbles into an acting audition and from there stumbles into a murder mystery.

I need to be honest about this.  I remember the following about this movie:

  1. What is mentioned in the first line of this review.
  2. That the chemistry between stars Robert Downey Jr. and Val Kilmer is great.
  3. That I laughed.
That's it.  I watched this movie about a month ago and remember NOTHING about it.  Except that I liked it.  Liked it a lot as I remember.  Until I looked at some research I had forgotten that Kilmer's character is called "Gay Perry".  I have never had a movie that I enjoyed leave such a small mark in my memory.

So what does that say about it?  Probably that there's not much of a story here (high concept?).  But the interaction between the cast is worth enough to watch.

I feel like I should rate it higher.  But I don't remember why.

Rating - *** Worth A Look

Monday, November 11, 2013

Movie Review - Advise and Consent

Advise and Consent (1962) - The nomination for Secretary of State faces an intense investigation in the Senate that raises an issue that may not only ruin the candidates chances but might take down the President as well.  Their opponents will stop at nothing, even blackmail to get their way.

I'll start by noting that Henry Fonda is on my short list of "I'll watch anything he's in" actors.  He had great taste in accepting roles and was even able to take unimpressive scripts and turn them into something worth watching.  Now add Otto Preminger as director and all star cast (Walter Pidgeon, Gene Tierney, Charles Laughton, Peter Lawford, Burgess Meredith and Betty White) and you're off and running to a fine movie.

Given the gridlock that we have seen over Presidential appointments for a while now the movie feels very contemporary. If you think the level of arrogance, ideological posturing and political maneuvering we see today is somehow new this movie may come as a great surprise.  The issue at the time was still Communism and the evil of "appeasement".  Interesting that the phrase "Don't Tread On Me" which is much in vogue today comes up here as well.  America's long standing anti-intellectual streak is on display as well.

Along the way you get some quality performances from the great cast.  Not a lot of action but really good stuff.  Add in the Communist story line and the fact that both Meredith and Geer were blacklisted by the House Un-American Activities Committee in the '50s.  The movie is based on the novel of the same name by Allen Drury.  Drury had been a journalist on Capitol Hill during the '50s and the characters are reportedly based on actual people (including John F. Kennedy, Eugene McCarthy and others).  Much of the action is based on actual events including the blackmail attempt.  It makes the movie even more compelling.

This is a powerful political thriller and well worth the time to watch.

Rating - **** Recommended


Sunday, November 10, 2013

NaNoWriMo Update, Oxford Commas and Double Spaces, and The Christmas Music Rant



 "The View From the Phlipside" is a media commentary program airing on WRFA-LP, Jamestown NY.  It can be heard Monday through Friday just after 8 AM and 5 PM.  The following are scripts which may not exactly match the aired version of the program.  Mostly because the host may suddenly choose to add or subtract words at a moments notice.  WRFA-LP is not responsible for any such silliness or the opinions expressed.  You can listen to a live stream of WRFA or find a podcast of this program at wrfalp.com.  Copyright 2013 by Jay Phillippi.  All Rights Reserved.  You like what you see?  Drop me a line and we can talk.

Program scripts from week of November 3, 2013


My name is Jay Phillippi and I've spent my life in and around the media.  TV, radio, the movies and more.  I love them, and I hate them and I always have an opinion.  Call this the View from the Phlipside. 

Christmas Music Rant                                                                                        

Every year I have a private little rant about Christmas music.  It goes back to the days when I was the Music Director at a certain radio station across town.  Normally this rant takes place, like clockwork, right around Thanksgiving.  

But not this year.  Oh no, I’m going public with it and I’m going public with it right now.  While I was driving in Buffalo this weekend I heard a promo for a radio station that announced they were going all Christmas music beginning November first right through Christmas.  (I am not mentioning their call letters because I don’t want you to encourage them by listening to this abomination)

Remember I said that this silliness usually begins on Thanksgiving weekend.  Well these folks decided to get started on HALLOWEEN weekend!  And that’s just too much for me to bear.

Back when I was Music Director I refused to play Christmas music before December 1.  Let me tell you I got some very angry phone calls and more than a few glares from some of the air staff.  I didn’t apologize for it at the time and I make no apologies for it today.  It’s stupid.  It’s vile.  It’s abominable.  It trivializes both Thanksgiving and Christmas and is an utter sell out to everything wrong with the “holiday season” by giving into the complete commercialization of Christmas.

First, that offends me as a person of faith.  Different story for a different day.  Second, it offends me as a radio person.  It’s stupid, lazy programming.  The reality is that there are only about 37 Christmas songs all told.  There are 100 versions of each one.  Out of all those versions there might be 20 that you want to hear over and over.  For a couple weeks tops.  Instead you are going to hear every awful, idiotic, low rent version of “Blue Christmas” because they have 24 hours a day to fill.  Pop stars singing awful, maudlin arrangements of songs that more often than not are even less musically complex and compelling than the pop drivel they normally record.

Don’t get me wrong.  I love Christmas.  I love Christmas music.  Part of what makes the holidays special is that they’re, well, special.  As the saying goes “Christmas comes but once a year”.  Seems like we’re headed towards Christmas all year long.

That’s just stupid and wrong.  And this is my line in the sand.

Oxford Commas and Double Spaces                                                                   

I need to acknowledge up front this week that I’m going to offend some people.  Not many, mind you.  But some people take what I’m about to discuss very seriously.  And I think it’s utter rubbish.  But it gets a fair amount of discussion around the Interwebs.

You will probably not be surprised to find out that I have a lot of friends who are into words and writing.  Birds of a feather and stuff like that.  Some of these people take the whole language thing quite seriously.  By and large they are people of good humor who can discuss the issues of today’s commentary jokingly.  OK, mostly jokingly.

The center of this great debate are two.  They are the Oxford comma and double spaces following periods.  Yes, I’m serious.  People argue about these things.

I am also aware that more than a few of you have no idea what I’m talking about.  So let’s review.

First, the Oxford comma.  Also known as the serial comma, this is the punctuation which you may insert at the end of a list of items and just before the word “and”.  So you would say “item 1 comma, item 2 comma and item 3.  Except that many of us would omit the comma before the “and”.  Which is perfectly acceptable.  Unless you are a fan of the Oxford comma at which point you enter into long debates about its use.  I will note that there are times when that comma makes a difference in clarity.  At those points it should definitely be used.

The other argument I see my word loving friends having these days (yes, the people need to get lives.  What can I say?) is about the number of spaces following a period at the end of a sentence.  Back in the day when I was learning to type (on an actual typewriter, children!  Can you imagine!) we were taught to use two.  Today the conventional wisdom is that one is sufficient.  The argument seems to center on the difference between proportional and monospaced type fonts.  What does that mean?  Do you really care?  I didn’t think so.  And I doubt you much care about how many spaces are placed after the period.  I do it automatically, without thinking because I’ve been doing it that way for decades.  If for some reason it absolutely must be changed it’s simple with the “Find and Replace” function available on any word processor.

These are things that word nerds argue about.  Pity us and please, go live your lives.  Maybe we’ll follow.

NaNoWriMo Update                                                                                                                   

Week One was not a great week but it wasn't a total disaster.  My total word count for the first week was just over 8,000 words.  That was several thousand behind the curve (to make the 50,000 target you need to average over 1,600 words a day).  My best day was 2,800 but my worst was one day when I wrote nothing at all.  The good news is that I'm still just a couple really good writing days away from catching up.  But Week Two is always the worst.  So we'll see.


Call that the View From the Phlipside