Thursday, November 21, 2013

Zooooommmbbbiiessss!, Media Boycotts and Commercials on Parade



 "The View From the Phlipside" is a media commentary program airing on WRFA-LP, Jamestown NY.  It can be heard Monday through Friday just after 8 AM and 5 PM.  The following are scripts which may not exactly match the aired version of the program.  Mostly because the host may suddenly choose to add or subtract words at a moments notice.  WRFA-LP is not responsible for any such silliness or the opinions expressed.  You can listen to a live stream of WRFA or find a podcast of this program at wrfalp.com.  Copyright 2013 by Jay Phillippi.  All Rights Reserved.  You like what you see?  Drop me a line and we can talk.

Program scripts from week of November 10, 2013

(Somehow these got skipped.  Correcting that now!)

My name is Jay Phillippi and I've spent my life in and around the media.  TV, radio, the movies and more.  I love them, and I hate them and I always have an opinion.  Call this the View from the Phlipside. 

Commercials on Parade                                                                                       

Feels like I haven’t gone all fan boy on TV commercials for a while.  And at the moment there are several out there that I really like.  In case you haven’t grasped it yet, I like well made commercials.  

There are a couple of alcoholic beverage commercials that recently caught my eye.  Alcohol is a product that can’t actually advertise on it’s primary benefit.  They can not even wander into the neighborhood of “use our product and we will make you feel goooooooooood”.  So it inevitably becomes about other things.  For example, and this is not an ad campaign that I much like it just strikes me as odd, the folks at Coors are currently running a campaign that centers on the fact that their beer is really cold.  That’s it, just that it’s cold.  OK.  Meanwhile Budweiser is spending lots of time putting a human face on their corporate beer empire by introducing us to the regional brew masters.

Neither of these are the ads that caught my eye.  There are two tequila companies that have chosen almost the exact same approach.  To the point that I didn’t realize they were for two different products.  1800 brand has been going with a single spokesman for a while but they were going for a snarky, pseudo cool thing.  Now they’ve flipped that and gone with Ray Liotta who basically just challenges the manhood of anyone not drinking tequila.  Matching that are the folks at Jose Cuervo with Keifer Sutherland challenging the world to “Have A Story”.  Suddenly tequila is a sophisticated yet macho part of life.  With, of course, no hint of what else may come with a sample or three.

The other ad that has really jumped out at me is the T-Mobile “Jeremy” campaign.  Seems that Jeremy is an young adult son travelling in Europe.  Problem is that Jeremy insists on using data as if he were in the United States and the bill on his parent’s plan is getting enormous.  We learn all this through videos from Jeremy’s parents as they try to get their sons attention.  What really grabs me is that the spots take a fairly nerdy concept (overseas data use) and turn it into something that we can all understand and a situation that makes perfect sense.   That’s really advertising writing at it’s best.

Like a good TV series I can hardly wait to find out what’s next.


Media Boycotts                                                                                                    

I’ve maintained from the beginning with this commentary that I wasn’t going to get into movie reviews and the like.  Too many other people out there doing it.  I’d rather try and offer a starting point for the discussion about the media and its impact on our lives.

Having said that I will begin by saying this commentary begins with me going to see a movie.  I saw “Ender’s Game” based on the book of the same name by Orson Scott Card.  I thought it did an OK job of translating the book, which is a favorite, to the screen.  That’s the end of the movie review.

There’s a lot of noise about boycotting the movie because of some really outrageous comments starting with a threat to overthrow the Federal government if Marriage Equality becomes the law of the land to claiming that President Obama is creating a private army to insure that Michelle Obama is the next President of the United States.  There are plenty of people that come down on both sides of those issues.  Personally I think he’s nuts on these subjects.

But here’s the problem.  I also think Orson Scott Card is one of the best science fiction writers of the last 30 years.  “Ender’s Game” and its sequel “Speaker for the Dead” are in the top one percent for me.  

The question becomes are we really ready to start making media decisions based on the personal lives and opinions of the creators?  Are we ready to go all the way with that?

What would that mean?  Well, Ernest Hemingway was a drunk and pretty clearly a sexist.  Shall we stop reading the works of T.S. Eliot and Roald Dahl for the anti-semitism?  And of course that means we stop listening to the operas of Richard Wagner.  I’m not much of an opera fan but I’m told his stuff really rocks.  And along the way we should probably stop buying Ford vehicles because Henry Ford was an anti-semite too.

Is the dividing line that all those other people are dead?  I have many friends in the LGBT community and their supporters.  I would never argue with their right NOT to support an author like Orson Scott Card.  I’m just wondering where the line actually gets drawn.  And why.

Day of the Doctor                                                                                                                   

So I have to ask.  What’s with all the zombies right now?  I know it’s not really a new thing any more but it seems like every time I turn around there’s another zombie TV series, movie or book out there.  Sundance Channel just debuted the American version of the French hit “The Returned” which offers a different view of the undead than the hugely successful “The Walking Dead” on AMC.  It’s clear that zombies have turned the corner on popular culture warm fuzzies.  Like vampires before them we’re seeing more zombies that just want to live their lives.  Add in fun books like local author Lia Habel’s “Dearly, Departed” and zombies are a whole new thing.

Zombies aren’t new and it’s not their first change in PR image either.  Go back before the ‘60s and zombies are almost always shown with some connection with Voodoo.  These re-animated corpses got all the creepiness they needed out of being, well, re-animated dead people.  They were the slaves of the person who performed the rituals to bring them back.  Prior to the late ‘60s and that’s the kind of zombie you’ll see.  Check out the undead working for Bela Lugosi in 1932’s “White Zombie”.

All that changes, of course, in 1968.  You’ve been waiting for me to get here, right?  George Romero’s “Night of the Living Dead” brings us the zombies we know today.  Shuffling, decaying monsters who want braaaaaaaaaaainnss!  Since then we’ve pretty much dropped the old school zombie.  That is until this new batch of warm, cuddly undead.

So what’s with all the zombies?  The learned folk out there who study this kind of thing seem to have come up with a logical sounding explanation.  in the 1950s when the world was a scary and unpredictable place the movies were suddenly filled with aliens from outer space.  Technology was beginning to suddenly take over more and more of our lives.  People found that scary and the movies reflected those feelings.  Today we live in an age when it seems like there are a lot of people out there who don’t like us, where there are a lot of “things” being done by science that might be doing strange things to our bodies that we don’t understand.  In a time like that what better manifestation of our inner fears than an enemy that can not be reasoned with, who desires nothing more than our grim and frightening death?

So maybe this whole thing of making zombies a little more living friendly is a sign that we’re moving out of that phase of our culture again.  Why not?  Klaatu and Gort from “The Day the Earth Stood Still” morphed into “My Favorite Martian” in only a decade.


Call that the View From the Phlipside

Monday, November 18, 2013

Movie Review - Kiss Kiss Bang Bang

Kiss Kiss Bang Bang (2005) - A thief stumbles into an acting audition and from there stumbles into a murder mystery.

I need to be honest about this.  I remember the following about this movie:

  1. What is mentioned in the first line of this review.
  2. That the chemistry between stars Robert Downey Jr. and Val Kilmer is great.
  3. That I laughed.
That's it.  I watched this movie about a month ago and remember NOTHING about it.  Except that I liked it.  Liked it a lot as I remember.  Until I looked at some research I had forgotten that Kilmer's character is called "Gay Perry".  I have never had a movie that I enjoyed leave such a small mark in my memory.

So what does that say about it?  Probably that there's not much of a story here (high concept?).  But the interaction between the cast is worth enough to watch.

I feel like I should rate it higher.  But I don't remember why.

Rating - *** Worth A Look

Monday, November 11, 2013

Movie Review - Advise and Consent

Advise and Consent (1962) - The nomination for Secretary of State faces an intense investigation in the Senate that raises an issue that may not only ruin the candidates chances but might take down the President as well.  Their opponents will stop at nothing, even blackmail to get their way.

I'll start by noting that Henry Fonda is on my short list of "I'll watch anything he's in" actors.  He had great taste in accepting roles and was even able to take unimpressive scripts and turn them into something worth watching.  Now add Otto Preminger as director and all star cast (Walter Pidgeon, Gene Tierney, Charles Laughton, Peter Lawford, Burgess Meredith and Betty White) and you're off and running to a fine movie.

Given the gridlock that we have seen over Presidential appointments for a while now the movie feels very contemporary. If you think the level of arrogance, ideological posturing and political maneuvering we see today is somehow new this movie may come as a great surprise.  The issue at the time was still Communism and the evil of "appeasement".  Interesting that the phrase "Don't Tread On Me" which is much in vogue today comes up here as well.  America's long standing anti-intellectual streak is on display as well.

Along the way you get some quality performances from the great cast.  Not a lot of action but really good stuff.  Add in the Communist story line and the fact that both Meredith and Geer were blacklisted by the House Un-American Activities Committee in the '50s.  The movie is based on the novel of the same name by Allen Drury.  Drury had been a journalist on Capitol Hill during the '50s and the characters are reportedly based on actual people (including John F. Kennedy, Eugene McCarthy and others).  Much of the action is based on actual events including the blackmail attempt.  It makes the movie even more compelling.

This is a powerful political thriller and well worth the time to watch.

Rating - **** Recommended


Sunday, November 10, 2013

NaNoWriMo Update, Oxford Commas and Double Spaces, and The Christmas Music Rant



 "The View From the Phlipside" is a media commentary program airing on WRFA-LP, Jamestown NY.  It can be heard Monday through Friday just after 8 AM and 5 PM.  The following are scripts which may not exactly match the aired version of the program.  Mostly because the host may suddenly choose to add or subtract words at a moments notice.  WRFA-LP is not responsible for any such silliness or the opinions expressed.  You can listen to a live stream of WRFA or find a podcast of this program at wrfalp.com.  Copyright 2013 by Jay Phillippi.  All Rights Reserved.  You like what you see?  Drop me a line and we can talk.

Program scripts from week of November 3, 2013


My name is Jay Phillippi and I've spent my life in and around the media.  TV, radio, the movies and more.  I love them, and I hate them and I always have an opinion.  Call this the View from the Phlipside. 

Christmas Music Rant                                                                                        

Every year I have a private little rant about Christmas music.  It goes back to the days when I was the Music Director at a certain radio station across town.  Normally this rant takes place, like clockwork, right around Thanksgiving.  

But not this year.  Oh no, I’m going public with it and I’m going public with it right now.  While I was driving in Buffalo this weekend I heard a promo for a radio station that announced they were going all Christmas music beginning November first right through Christmas.  (I am not mentioning their call letters because I don’t want you to encourage them by listening to this abomination)

Remember I said that this silliness usually begins on Thanksgiving weekend.  Well these folks decided to get started on HALLOWEEN weekend!  And that’s just too much for me to bear.

Back when I was Music Director I refused to play Christmas music before December 1.  Let me tell you I got some very angry phone calls and more than a few glares from some of the air staff.  I didn’t apologize for it at the time and I make no apologies for it today.  It’s stupid.  It’s vile.  It’s abominable.  It trivializes both Thanksgiving and Christmas and is an utter sell out to everything wrong with the “holiday season” by giving into the complete commercialization of Christmas.

First, that offends me as a person of faith.  Different story for a different day.  Second, it offends me as a radio person.  It’s stupid, lazy programming.  The reality is that there are only about 37 Christmas songs all told.  There are 100 versions of each one.  Out of all those versions there might be 20 that you want to hear over and over.  For a couple weeks tops.  Instead you are going to hear every awful, idiotic, low rent version of “Blue Christmas” because they have 24 hours a day to fill.  Pop stars singing awful, maudlin arrangements of songs that more often than not are even less musically complex and compelling than the pop drivel they normally record.

Don’t get me wrong.  I love Christmas.  I love Christmas music.  Part of what makes the holidays special is that they’re, well, special.  As the saying goes “Christmas comes but once a year”.  Seems like we’re headed towards Christmas all year long.

That’s just stupid and wrong.  And this is my line in the sand.

Oxford Commas and Double Spaces                                                                   

I need to acknowledge up front this week that I’m going to offend some people.  Not many, mind you.  But some people take what I’m about to discuss very seriously.  And I think it’s utter rubbish.  But it gets a fair amount of discussion around the Interwebs.

You will probably not be surprised to find out that I have a lot of friends who are into words and writing.  Birds of a feather and stuff like that.  Some of these people take the whole language thing quite seriously.  By and large they are people of good humor who can discuss the issues of today’s commentary jokingly.  OK, mostly jokingly.

The center of this great debate are two.  They are the Oxford comma and double spaces following periods.  Yes, I’m serious.  People argue about these things.

I am also aware that more than a few of you have no idea what I’m talking about.  So let’s review.

First, the Oxford comma.  Also known as the serial comma, this is the punctuation which you may insert at the end of a list of items and just before the word “and”.  So you would say “item 1 comma, item 2 comma and item 3.  Except that many of us would omit the comma before the “and”.  Which is perfectly acceptable.  Unless you are a fan of the Oxford comma at which point you enter into long debates about its use.  I will note that there are times when that comma makes a difference in clarity.  At those points it should definitely be used.

The other argument I see my word loving friends having these days (yes, the people need to get lives.  What can I say?) is about the number of spaces following a period at the end of a sentence.  Back in the day when I was learning to type (on an actual typewriter, children!  Can you imagine!) we were taught to use two.  Today the conventional wisdom is that one is sufficient.  The argument seems to center on the difference between proportional and monospaced type fonts.  What does that mean?  Do you really care?  I didn’t think so.  And I doubt you much care about how many spaces are placed after the period.  I do it automatically, without thinking because I’ve been doing it that way for decades.  If for some reason it absolutely must be changed it’s simple with the “Find and Replace” function available on any word processor.

These are things that word nerds argue about.  Pity us and please, go live your lives.  Maybe we’ll follow.

NaNoWriMo Update                                                                                                                   

Week One was not a great week but it wasn't a total disaster.  My total word count for the first week was just over 8,000 words.  That was several thousand behind the curve (to make the 50,000 target you need to average over 1,600 words a day).  My best day was 2,800 but my worst was one day when I wrote nothing at all.  The good news is that I'm still just a couple really good writing days away from catching up.  But Week Two is always the worst.  So we'll see.


Call that the View From the Phlipside

Monday, November 4, 2013

Why Write Reviews?

The primary function of this blog is to support and promote my radio program of the same name.  A radio program where I virtually NEVER review books, movies, music, et cetera.  So why write reviews here?

There are two primary reasons:

  • The first is purely functional.  I had originally tried publishing the scripts individually to fill out the posting schedule.  It felt artificial to me and was something of a pain in the butt.  So the reviews are added content for the blog.  Unromantic, I know.
  • The second is because I love exploring media.  I watch a lot of movies and read a lot of books plus deal with all kinds of other media along the way.  It seemed like an interesting way to share with my readers and perhaps point them towards things they had never seen or read.
You'll note that I rarely if ever do reviews of current movies or music.  There are plenty of people out there doing that (like this guy - Stewart Smith)  so I didn't feel the need to compete.  But what about this, there are thousands of movies still available going back to the 1920s.  If you're looking for a good movie to watch how likely are you to explore titles you know little or nothing about?  My goal is to point people towards movies that are worth viewing but that may not be as well known to them.  Movie fans no doubt look at my reviews and say "Well everybody knows that movie".  I'm pretty sure they're wrong.  So I'm trying to offer a service for those other movies.

Yes I still review more current ones.  In part that's because these are movies that I want to see.  Coming up shortly is my review of "Argo" the Academy Award winning movie from just last year.  Never got to see it in the theaters.  So I offer up my review for it.  Maybe you're in the same boat and would like an opinion that's not caught up in the promotional furor.  Other movies coming up include "Kiss Kiss Bang Bang" (which will be the oddest review I've ever penned) and "Advise and Consent" an amazingly current movie given that it came out in 1962.

I do offer reviews of books that are coming out soon.  I stumbled onto a partnership that allows me to do that and it's kind of fun.  But I'm really more focused on the other books, the older books I read.  Along the way maybe I can help you find something that you might never have tried otherwise.  I was caught short by how much I enjoyed Dumas' "The Three Musketeers" from 1844 and James Hilton's "Goodbye Mr. Chips" from 1934.  These may be titles that you might never consider but with me leading the way and doing some filtering you might (and dare I say, you should!).

There is a certain egotism inherent in setting yourself up as a critic.  Why should you listen to what I say?  Good question.  I can only offer that I love the media that I review as general categories and I want people to succeed.  Long ago I gave up on trying to make people think I'm clever.  You'll either like my point of view or not.  Although I would note that for years one of my go to movie critics was someone with whom I virtually always disagreed.  He was consistent and therefore an excellent bell weather for me.  

I hope that I can offer something worth reading for you as well.

Besides I have fun doing it.

Saturday, November 2, 2013

The Writer Prepares

One must make sure that the scene is set to tempt the muse.  NaNoWriMo 2013 is underway!


(For those who are wondering it is the Marquis white from 21 Brix Winery just up the road.  The numbers are a challenge and a reminder.  You can figure those out for yourselves)

Friday, November 1, 2013

Mea Culpa, NaNoWriMo13, and War of the Worlds



 "The View From the Phlipside" is a media commentary program airing on WRFA-LP, Jamestown NY.  It can be heard Monday through Friday just after 8 AM and 5 PM.  The following are scripts which may not exactly match the aired version of the program.  Mostly because the host may suddenly choose to add or subtract words at a moments notice.  WRFA-LP is not responsible for any such silliness or the opinions expressed.  You can listen to a live stream of WRFA or find a podcast of this program at wrfalp.com.  Copyright 2013 by Jay Phillippi.  All Rights Reserved.  You like what you see?  Drop me a line and we can talk.

Program scripts from week of October 28, 2013


My name is Jay Phillippi and I've spent my life in and around the media.  TV, radio, the movies and more.  I love them, and I hate them and I always have an opinion.  Call this the View from the Phlipside. 

NaNoWriMo13                                                                                        

Much to my surprise I note that I have not talked about National Novel Writing Month, known as NaNoWriMo, in almost three years.  With November knocking on the door, that is the month in question, I thought this would be a great time to mention it again.

If the name rings no bells for you let me review.  NaNoWriMo is an annual opportunity to live the dream.  The dream of writing your own novel.  The goal is 50,000 words in 30 days.  The core idea is to worry less (in fact, not at all) about the quality of your writing.  The goal is to get you to create a habit of writing, to try something you’ve never tried before.  Or even better to help you finish what you have tried and failed at before.  Last year 341,375 people started the challenge, 178,211 completed the challenge.  The great thing is that you don’t have to do it alone.  There are online forums where you can compare notes, ask for help, look for or offer encouragement and find a shoulder to cry on when you hit one of the tough spots.  Many regions of the country even have write-ins, opportunities for folks taking the challenge to get together, hang out and write.  It is one of the more amazing events I’ve ever done.

And yes, I’ve done it.  In 2009, at my daughter’s urging, I gave it a shot.  My certificate from the Office of Letters and Light proclaiming that I had achieved the 50,000 word target in the month hangs proudly near my desk.  The goal had been to do it again the following year but my stroke intervened.  I’ve never managed to get it together again since then.

However, once again at the urging of my daughter, no let’s be honest, at the outright command of my daughter, now a Masters of Fine Arts Candidate in Creative Writing at Carlow University, I am trying it again this year.

It’s really NOT about whether or not you are the next Ernest Hemingway, Anne Rice or Dan Brown.  It’s about pushing yourself to try something new.  It’s about finding a new way to express your creativity.  NaNoWriMo says of itself that it is about “...Valuing enthusiasm, determination, and a deadline...”. 

So what about you?  Are you up for a challenge?  Have you ever thought that you might have an idea for a book in you?  There is still time to get ready.  Who knows you may start November as an auto mechanic, a store clerk, a middle school English teacher or a talking head on the radio.  But you could end it as a novelist.

(It's not too late to start!  Check out NaNoWriMo.org)

War of the Worlds                                                                                                 

75 years ago this week an event took place that dramatically changed my life.  Now that’s several decades before I was even born but the lingering legend of it thrilled me, inspired me and as much as anything brought me to where I am today.

October 30th, 1938 the radio series “The Mercury Theater on the Air” offered up a dramatization of H.G. Wells novel “The War of the Worlds”.  The production was the work of a then up and coming star Orson Welles.  He had made his mark already as a stage director and his career in films was still in front of him.  This was the event that made him a star.

That Halloween broadcast, with its use of fictional news reports “breaking into” the programming, was a sensation.  It’s hard for some to remember what radio was like in those days.  Where we watch TV or the Internet for amusement these days radio held the stage then.  But there was no way to know what exactly you were listening to as you scanned up or down the dial.  Since “Mercury Theater” ran commercial free there were no breaks in the action which probably added to the confusion between fact and fancy.

Beyond the fascinating work in the original broadcast (I own a copy of it and have listened to it multiple times) it was the stories of panic associated with it that first drew my attention.  For any art form to create that kind of reaction was thrilling to me.  Today we know that much of the legend around the panic is exactly that, legend.  While many people did call the radio stations, the police and the newspapers, very few barricaded themselves into the house or ran panic stricken into the streets.  Psychologists have noted that the world was in a stressful place that week, with fear of the war in Europe spreading to our country.

For me the radio broadcast of “War of the Worlds” remains a touchstone for all that media can be when it puts some effort into it.  “Mercury Theater on the Air” was a relatively small player in the media world at the time.  It was Welle’s attention to detail, careful planning of when certain events appeared in the broadcast and his commitment to making it as realistic as possible that took just another radio drama on an October evening to the status of legend.

I still believe the media can be that good.  Take the time this week and spend an hour with a classic.  75 years ago we were shown just how incredible imagination can be.



Mea Culpa                                                                                                                         

This week I need to offer a confession.  A mea culpa to try and make up for contributing to some stupidity earlier in my career.  It would be easy to make excuses but in the end what I can try to do it is make a change.

Do you remember the story from 1994 about the woman who spilled coffee on herself then sued the fast food restaurant that sold it to her and was awarded 2.9 million dollars?  Most of us do because it was a big story back then.  People were outraged and media folk like me had a field day with it.  There was much mocking of a person dumb enough to put hot coffee between their legs while driving and much outrage over the “ridiculous” amount of money this foolish person received.  It made us feel all smug and righteous and clever.

There’s only one problem.  Most of what I just told you isn’t true.

Stella Liebeck, the 79 year old woman at the center of this story, wasn’t driving the car.  She was a passenger and the car was parked at the time.  The coffee was between her knees because the car didn’t have a flat place to put it while she put in her cream and sugar.  When the top popped off the coffee splashed on her causing the burns.  The injuries put her in the hospital for 8 days, required skin grafts and two years of treatment.  She tried to settle out of court for medical costs, was refused and went to court.  The initial judgement from the jury (which actually reduced their award because they noted that Mrs. Liebeck did bear some responsibility for the event) was 2.8 million.  The judge reduced that to just over 600 thousand and the final settlement was reportedly below 500 thousand dollars.

That’s a different story, isn’t it?
What happened was that the story got edited down and edited down for space till the version most of us saw had only the minimal details.  Sadly the rest was filled in by people trying to fluff out the story.  In an age when more journalism seems to be aimed at reducing the footprint of the stories we see it strikes me as a cautionary tale.

Too often I see folks passing along stories that can quickly be shown to be incomplete or outright fabrications.  Our laziness in this regard allows falsehood to masquerade in the clothing of truth.  That’s something none of us should support.

Stella Liebeck deserved for the true story to be told.  It’s taken me 20 years but now I’ve done it.


Call that the View From the Phlipside