Monday, July 29, 2013

Movie Review - RED 2

RED 2 (2013) -  The world's premier geriatric band of undercover specialists team up again to track down and neutralize a potential nuclear bomb.

Let's face it, what makes this movie and its predecessor so much fun has very little to do with the plot.  This is about the characters and some fun dialogue.  Frank Moses (Bruce Willis) is a retired CIA hit man who has finally found love with Sarah (Mary Louise Parker) and has retired to a quiet suburb.  The problem is that Sarah got a taste of his former life in the first movie.  And she LIKES it.  So when ex-partner and professional paranoid Marvin (John Malkovich) turns back up she's ready to go even if Frank isn't.  Turns out a CIA project that was supposed to be finished years ago (closed out by one of the few mistakes Frank's team ever made) has re-surfaced.  In true movie fashion the evil suits in the Intelligence community decide to cover it all up by killing everyone involved.  Like Frank and Marvin.  The delightfully psychotic assassin Victoria (Helen Mirren) is given the contract to take them out.  Along the way we meet the genius behind the threat (and the focus of the mistake years ago) Dr. Edward Bailey (Anthony Hopkins, who plays him to the very edge.  Hopkins flips from comic absent minded professor to Hannibal Lecter between breaths.  Really astounding work to make it all fit together).  Add in Russian agent and Franks former flame Katya (Catherine Zeta-Jones.  Hate the bangs but for her I'd forgive almost anything) and you have some serious fun ready to go.

The dialogue crackles at the same tempo as the action.  And the movie is laugh out loud funny from beginning to end.  Here's a clue how much fun these movies are.  My family saw the first one together and when the sequel came out we drove 3 hours so we could watch it together as well.

Rating -**** Recommended

Friday, July 26, 2013

Cover of the Rolling Stone, Emmy Shift and Quality Journalism

 "The View From the Phlipside" is a media commentary program airing on WRFA-LP, Jamestown NY.  It can be heard Tuesday through Friday just after 8 AM and 5 PM.  The following are scripts which may not exactly match the aired version of the program.  Mostly because the host may suddenly choose to add or subtract words at a moments notice.  WRFA-LP is not responsible for any such silliness or the opinions expressed.  You can listen to a live stream of WRFA or find a podcast of this program at wrfalp.com.  Copyright 2013 by Jay Phillippi.  All Rights Reserved.  You like what you see?  Drop me a line and we can talk.

Program scripts from week of July 23 2013


My name is Jay Phillippi and I've spent my life in and around the media.  TV, radio, the movies and more.  I love them, and I hate them and I always have an opinion.  Call this the View from the Phlipside. 

Quality Journalism                                                                                               

There are some stories that pop up quickly and then die out just as quickly.  Given the production schedule for these commentaries sometimes I see something that looks interesting but it becomes a non-issue before I can get a commentary up and running.

The recent story associated with the crash of the Asiana Airlines plane in San Francisco looked to be one of those.  Following the crash a Bay area TV station announced that it had the names of the four pilots of the plane in the accident.  What they then read off were four racially insensitive names that any 10 year old would have recognized as a joke.  Turns out the “source” for the names was a summer intern at a federal bureau that was part of the post crash investigation.  It was a great launching point to talk again about the importance of quality journalism.  But when the federal agency apologized and I assume dropped the intern and the television station apologized the story was running out of time.  Even the actual pilots  threatened to sue but then changed their minds.  Pretty much story over.  Yes, the TV news station should fire a few people as well for unprofessional levels of stupid but hey.  I was prepared to take a pass on the story.

Until Monday.

Mrs. Phlipside and I were having dinner at a local downtown landmark restaurant when I overheard a conversation at the next table that made me want to weep and rage.  And it gave new life to the story.  The folks were discussing those stupid names and were insistent that “Those are the REAL names.  I heard about it on the news”.  The conversation went down hill from there.

THIS is why doing journalism right is so important.  This is why
verifying sources is important.  This is why it is more important to spend the extra minutes THINKING about what you report than being the first on the air or in print.  Did no one in that newsroom read those names out loud?  Do none of them have an 8 year old boy in their lives?  As I review the story for this commentary I saw that the TV station didn’t even accept responsibility.  They blamed the federal agency for mis-informing them.

Turns out even the shortest story in the news might be more important than we think.


Emmy Shift                                                                                                              

Don’t know if you noticed it but the earth moved a little on it’s orbit just a little bit last week.  There’s a new TV awards contender in town and you may not ever see it on your TV.  At least not so far.

For the Broadway stage there are the Tony’s, for movies the Oscars, for music the Grammys and for television the Emmy.  Administered by three separate organizations (The Academy of Television Arts and Sciences, the NATIONAL Academy of Television Arts and Sciences and the INTERNATIONAL Academy of Television Arts and Sciences) the Grammys probably are the most diverse awards, um, program in the world.  There’s the Primetime and Daytime versions plus versions for news, sports, business and finance, engineering and technology plus regional and international versions.  It’s all pretty complicated.

The other art forms (theater, movies and music) have relatively compact fields of competition.  At least they are less affected by the vehicle carrying the programming.  In 1988 suddenly the Emmy’s were faced with the reality that cable TV programming needed to be recognized.  Today cable TV dominates the awards.  In 2006 the Emmys opened their arms to programming aimed at “computers, mobile phones, iPods, PDAs, and similar devices.”   But it was the Daytime Emmys so no one was particularly concerned.  Two years later it was programming that aired on the Internet that was given a place at the table.

Wait, aren’t these TV awards?

Well now the great change has really taken place.  It’s one thing to say your shows can be considered.  It’s something else to actually snag a nomination.
Enter the game changer.  Netflix, which began life as a movie rental company, picked up 9 nominations for it’s smash show “House of Cards” including nods in Best Program and Best Lead Male and Female.  They grabbed a few others for two other programs as well.

So what do we mean when we talk about television from this moment forward?  What does this say about how we watch whatever it is we’re going to call TV from now on?  As much as anything else these award nominations are an indication of the paradigm shift in TV.

And that would be an entirely new house of cards for the industry.



Cover of the Rolling Stone                                                                                                          

The latest storm on the media horizon has to do with the cover of the Rolling Stone.  Not the 1973 Top 10 novelty hit song by Dr. Hook and the Medicine Show but the actual cover of Rolling Stone magazine.

The current issue shows the photo of alleged Boston Marathon bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev.  The picture, which at least one report I’ve seen says is what the kids call a “selfie” or a self shot, shows a fairly normal looking young man with long curly brown hair.  That shot has set plenty of people off including the folks at Wal-Mart, CVS, Rite-Aid and 7-Eleven who have announced they won’t sell this issue.  Given that I don’t want corporate suits deciding what I can and can’t buy I think that’s a pretty stupid response.  But as we say different topic for a different day.

So what’s all the furor about?  Obviously the psychic wounds of the bombing are still quite sensitive for some and I respect that.  At the same time I don’t get why the outrage has reached the level it has.  Let’s look at the history.

This isn’t the first alleged mass murderer that Rolling Stone has featured on the cover.  Charles Manson has that dubious honor.  It’s not even that no other publication has ever done this before.  An August 1966 issue of Time magazine featured Charles Whitman.  For those who don’t remember that name Whitman was known as the Texas Tower sniper.  He climbed the tower in the center of the University of Texas and killed or wounded 49 people that day.  The picture on the cover was of smiling, All American young man with a puppy dog at his side.

The headline on the Rolling Stone cover reads “The Bomber - How a Popular, Promising Student Was Failed By His Family, Fell Into Radical Islam and Became A Monster”.  That’s why this is the right photo to go with the story.  Because it’s about how a seemingly normal, successful and yes, rather good looking young man, can descend so deep into the darkness.  It is the disparity of the appearance and the act that make us so uncomfortable.  It is exactly the kind of in-your-face approach that Rolling Stone has specialized in for decades.

I’m not saying you have to like the cover.  I’m certainly not saying you should buy the issue although I may.  I am saying that from a story-telling/journalism point of view I believe that there’s a very legitimate argument for that photo to be on the cover of the Rolling Stone.


Call that the View From the Phlipside

Thursday, July 25, 2013

Music Review - Burrow by Max Garcia Conover

Burrow - Max Garcia Conover (Clip Records)

This is the debut album for a young man with local roots in my backyard.  Max is an amazingly talented guitar player/singer/songwriter who isn't going to fit into a nice neat pigeon hole.

I got the chance to hear Conover play live at the Hometown Album Release Party at Southern Tier Brewery earlier in July.  He replicated the thoughtful lyric/straightforward music combination that I'd heard listening online.

The music on the album goes it's own way and that may be why I love it so much.  "Burrow" opens with an acoustic cut "Teem" that is quiet and compelling.   That's a unusual choice but Conover is not your usual performer.  There are two instrumentals on this album ("Fog Over Treeline" is the other, which runs a whopping 59 seconds).  Exactly one song runs longer than three minutes ("The Wedding Line") and all the songs offer lyrics that you can mull on for quite a while.  You can look at them as being obscure or you can find in them the kind of depth rarely found in the popular hits of today (or any day).  As an example I'm not sure I understand the opening lyrics of  "For Blackwater Woods" but they speak to me:
I seek the storm where frost hits the high reeds me leaping from shore.  I sing for the sweat and if my knees can carry moon shine for me yet.  I seek the storm you need shelter me not I don't aspire to the warmth
Like poetry the lyrics speak to the emotion as much as the intellect.  Rather than simply telling a story directly it carries you into the story challenging you to find your own way.

The show in July was nice but Max needs to work on developing a more commanding stage presence.  He did note that he had only been a "professional touring musician" for less than a month at that point.  The venue offers a challenge to one guy and a guitar.  That means that have a solid on stage presence is all the more vital.  Otherwise he can just slide into background music.

And he deserves much, much better than that.  Thoughtful, complex singer/songwriters aren't everyone's cup of tea.  But for those who love a little depth I think they'll like this one.

Rating - *** Worth A Listen

Friday, July 19, 2013

The Perils of Pop Stardom, E-book readers Part 2, Your Kids Might Be Rednecks



 "The View From the Phlipside" is a media commentary program airing on WRFA-LP, Jamestown NY.  It can be heard Tuesday through Friday just after 8 AM and 5 PM.  The following are scripts which may not exactly match the aired version of the program.  Mostly because the host may suddenly choose to add or subtract words at a moments notice.  WRFA-LP is not responsible for any such silliness or the opinions expressed.  You can listen to a live stream of WRFA or find a podcast of this program at wrfalp.com.  Copyright 2013 by Jay Phillippi.  All Rights Reserved.  You like what you see?  Drop me a line and we can talk.



Program scripts from week of July 8, 2013


My name is Jay Phillippi and I've spent my life in and around the media.  TV, radio, the movies and more.  I love them, and I hate them and I always have an opinion.  Call this the View from the Phlipside. 

Your Kids Might Be Rednecks                                                                              

Being a parent these days means that you are faced with a seemingly endless list of potential pitfalls for your children.  As someone one who works with teens I know it seems that every week there’s some new fad or trend that I need to pass along to parents so they know.  But this one may come as a surprise.  You may want to check but it’s possible that your kids are becoming or have become rednecks.

The first thing we’ll need to do is deal with the whole concept of redneck.  People tend to fall into two groups when it comes to the term  - those for whom it is a negative and those for whom it is a badge of honor. In media terms today redneck can be defined as a culture or a way of looking at culture that is based in a more rural or working class point of view.  In a day and age when we are predominantly an urban culture dominated by technology there is a growing popularity of what seems like a simpler way of life.

Don’t believe me?  Take a look at the current trend of popular TV shows starting with “Duck Dynasty”.  The show has amassed some huge ratings about a group of folks who proudly proclaim themselves and their lifestyle as “redneck”.  Then check out shows like “Swamp People”, “Buck Wild”.  Add in shows that are aimed at a much more blue collar lifestyle like “Deadliest Catch” and “Ice Road Truckers”.  Once you get thinking about it there is a HUGE number of shows like this all over cable these days.  If you’ve noticed an increase in the amount of plaid and denim being worn by pop culture figures you’ve already seen the effect it is having on society.  The interesting thing is that these shows model some interesting intersections like National Geographic Channel’s “Rocket City Rednecks” a show about a group of redneck scientists bringing some down home inventiveness to some real world problems and advanced engineering challenges.

What’s really funny is that we’ve been through this before.  Head back to the mid-60’s.  “The Andy Griffith Show”, “Gomer Pyle, USMC”, “The Beverly Hillbillies”, and the syndicated hit of “Hee Haw”.  You could probably add in the westerns of that same time period into the mix as well.

Given that redneck culture TV tends to support concept like family and hard work maybe it’s not the worst thing that could be influencing our kids.


Future of e-books Part 2                                                                                        

Last week I commented on the future of the e-book reader based on the less than thrilling sales numbers of Barnes and Noble’s Nook.  I wondered if the window for that particular technology might be closing sooner than we might have expected.  I wrote and recorded that program on Monday night.  On Tuesday morning the CEO of Barnes and Noble resigned without warning.

I would love to say those two events were connected in ANY way but my momma raised me to not tell lies.  We’re still not sure why William Lynch Jr resigned only 3 years into his tenure.  What we do know is that Barnes and Noble, a company that is still primarily a brick and mortar bookstore company, now has another problem on their plate.  In addition to chasing Amazon, Google and many others are moving into the competition for digital books.

If Barnes and Noble is going to survive they have to make the right decisions in the next 12 months.  Make the wrong ones right now and they will probably never recover.  What you do in a moment like this is pretty obvious just not necessarily easy.  You build on your strengths, you find what the audience wants and you give it to them.  

So if I’m being asked where to focus here’s what I tell them.  You’re a bookstore.  Book lovers love book stores.  But it’s not the vast impersonal big box book store that lights our fire.  It’s the one where we can feel like part of the culture, where the staff are knowledgable and helpful.  Don’t think Target think the Apple Store.  Think about creating a bookworm version of the Genius bar.  Book lovers want to come in and relax and love books.  Unless you come in the middle of the day it’s tough finding a seat in the reading areas at the Buffalo Barnes and Noble.  

The next step is so obvious that I’m astounded I need to say it.  But it’s time to drop some big bucks on getting the word out about who you are and what you offer.  The Nook e-reader is generally highly regarded but when was the last time you saw an ad for one?

There is a future for B&N.  Whether it’s a successful merger of brick and mortar with digital or bankruptcy will rest on the decisions they make in the wake of last week’s CEO exit.

I’m pretty confident in that prediction too.


Perils of Pop Stardom                                                                                                                   


There is nothing harder in this world to overcome in popular culture, no obstacle more challenging to surmount in a career than to be a teenage pop star.  The highway of fame is littered with folks who simply never found the way to make the transition from cute child star to adult working professional.

Note I don’t even talk about making the transition from star to star.  Making the transition from teen star to just having a career as an adult is incredibly hard.

Why is that?  I think there’s a lot of reasons.  First of all you have that shift from “cute” to something else.  There’s the fact that your audience is growing up, same as you.  You can’t keep doing the stuff you did when you were 14 aimed at a 14 year old audience once you pass about 17.  It just gets creepy.  The same problem happens to the pop star themselves.  Who are they really?  Any teenager wants to shed their younger persona while at the same time you have the distorted reality of being, well, a pop star.  It’s hard enough to be a teen in a regular life.  Imagine one with everything from more money than you’ve ever seen before to people who have quite simply lost their minds about you.  How do you find your way to an adult persona in the middle of all that foolishness?

What brings all of this to mind is watching the recent derailments in Justin Bieber’s career.  Think about this - Justin Bieber didn’t hit the Top 10 in the U.S. till 2010.  So in just three years we’ve gone from teeny bopper heart throb to having the largest janitor’s union in the country mad at him when he used a floor bucket as his own personal bathroom.  There have been other dopey moments along the way, like suggesting that Holocaust icon Anne Frank might have been a “belieber” if she’d lived today.  You just don’t go there.  The “Beebs” is 19 years old and that puts him right on the bullseye of this challenge.  A 20 year old still targeting a tweener audience just won’t work.  Meanwhile defining your “adulthood” through clubbing, obscenity and poor potty habits isn’t going to win you a lot of even young adult listeners.  To them you still carry the taint of teeny bopper stardom.

What should he do?  Well get his mom to stop defending him in print wouldn’t hurt.  No one will take you seriously if your mom is still telling everyone what a nice boy you are.  Oh and maybe he should talk to his stylist.  Every time I see a current photo of him I think it’s Vanilla Ice.

Surely that can’t be what they’re going for.


Call that the View From the Phlipside

Monday, July 15, 2013

Movie Review - The Barbarian Invasions

The Barbarian Invasions (2003) Remy is a dying man.  In his final days his estranged son Sebastian tries to make those days more comfortable.  Old friends and lovers will come together to try and ease his passage.   Along the way the divisions between generations of Quebecois are explored as well.  Left wing parents and their capitalist children clash over the past, religion and virtually anything else.  Meanwhile the older generation ponders life and mortality.

The result is a fascinating comedy/drama that took home the 2004 Oscar for  "Best Foreign Language Film". Turns out it is the second movie of a loose trilogy by director Denys Arcand.  The first movie came 17 years before "The Decline of the American Empire" and was followed three years later by "Days of Darkness".

Think of this as "The Big Chill" 30 years later with a Gallic flair.  The plot is unsurprising but that's fine because this is a movie about character.  Of the dying reprobate Remy.  His materialist son and cynical if still loving ex-wife.  His son's finacee who doesn't believe in romantic love.  The mistresses. The friends.  The heroin addicted daughter of one of the mistresses.  The daughter who is only with them in videos because she is sailing the Pacific (one of those very short videos may have been the most shattering scene in the whole movie for me).  They are rich and nuanced and human.   They are also imperfect.  Their imperfections drew them together and in large part the story is about celebrating those imperfections.  Together they create a fabulous movie.  It's a stunning achievement.

Rating - ***** Own It

Monday, July 1, 2013

Movie Review - The Stunt Man

The Stunt Man (1980) -  Want a visual definition of "star power"?  This movie is it.  Any part of this movie in which Peter O'Toole is not on screen is mediocre at best.  Bad '70s TV at its worst.  But when O'Toole is on screen it is something else entirely.

A fugitive from justice (Steve Railsback) falls into the middle of a movie shoot.  He may or may not have had something to do with the death of a stunt man on the shoot.  The director (O'Toole) takes an irrational shine to him and covers for him.  As a cover they make the fugitive the dead stunt man as they try to wrap the shoot.  In the final three days the fugitive, the director and the leading lady (Barbara Hershey) share their mutual insanity.  The story is a bit of a mess and you really don't need to worry about it.  It got Oscar nominations for both the director and the script which befuddles me.  It also earned one for O'Toole.  How is it this man has never won an Oscar?  But that's beside the point.

You watch this movie for Peter O'Toole.

Everyone around him wanders around in a fog.  The dialogue is weak, the characters are flat and the plot is predictable.  But O'Toole leaps off the screen.  When he leaves you wish he were back again.  His first scene (glaring at Railsback through the window of a hovering helicopter) is brief and completely without dialogue.  But it perfectly establishes the character to come.

Star power is turning a second rate clunker of a movie into something watchable and memorable.  Just by being on the screen.

Rating - *** Worth A Look